Chemical Composition of Crop Biomass Impacts Its Decomposition

Abbreviations: AI, acid insoluble; AS, acid soluble; SOC, soil organic carbon; SOM, soil organic matter. Understanding the interaction between plant components and their subsequent decomposition provides insights on how plant quality differences may infl uence C sequestration within a given management system. Our hypothesis was that decomposition is a function of biochemical composition when all other variables are constant (e.g., particle size, temperature and moisture). Recognizing the challenges of reconciling laboratory and fi eld studies, this study examined the decomposition dynamics of fiselected crops with varying composition under controlled temperature and moisture regimes. Residue materials were partitioned into leaf, stem, and root organs to give a clearer indication of compositional control on decomposition. Plant quality varied among species (alfalfa [Medicago sativa L.], corn [Zea mays L.], cuphea [Cuphea viscosissima Jacq. ⋅ Cuphea lanceolata W.T. Aiton], soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] and switchgrass [Panicum virgatum L.]). A two-component litter decomposition model was used to describe decomposition observed during 498 d. Stepwise multivariate regression indicated initial N concentration, starch, total lignin, and acid-insoluble ash (AI ash) were the four best predictors (r 2 = 0.83) of the rate of active component decomposition (k a ); however, initial composition poorly predicted the rate of passive decomposition (k p ). The best four-component model (r 2 = 0.43) identifi ed by stepwise multiple regression for k p included AI ash, hemicellulose, N concentration, and C/N ratio. Rate constants are a function of the incubation period, thus making direct comparison among separate experiments diffi cult. Chemical recalcitrance appears to slow root decomposition; such chemical recalcitrance to decay may partially explain why roots have been found to contribute more C to the SOC pool than surface residues.

[1]  K. Giller,et al.  Driven by Nature: Plant Litter Quality and Decomposition , 1996 .

[2]  R. R. Allmaras,et al.  Long‐Term Corn Residue Effects , 2004 .

[3]  F. Chapin,et al.  Decomposition of litter produced under elevated CO2: Dependence on plant species and nutrient supply , 1997 .

[4]  D. Stott,et al.  Synthesis and Degradation of Natural and Synthetic Humic Material in Soils , 1990 .

[5]  J. Hedges,et al.  Characterization of lignin by gas capillary chromatography of cupric oxide oxidation products , 1982 .

[6]  C. Kessel,et al.  The nitrogen and non-nitrogen rotation benefits of pea to succeeding crops , 1996 .

[7]  M. Reichstein,et al.  Temperature dependence of organic matter decomposition: a critical review using literature data analyzed with different models , 1998, Biology and Fertility of Soils.

[8]  G. H. Wagner,et al.  Microbial Colonization and Decomposition of Corn, Wheat, and Soybean Residue , 1988 .

[9]  W. W. Nelson,et al.  Soybean and Corn Rooting in Southwestern Minnesota: II. Root Distributions and Related Water Inflow , 1975 .

[10]  P. Puget,et al.  Short‐Term Dynamics of Root‐ and Shoot‐Derived Carbon from a Leguminous Green Manure , 2001 .

[11]  R. Gesch,et al.  Water Use and Root Length Density of Cuphea spp. Influenced by Row Spacing and Sowing Date , 2004 .

[12]  R. Aerts Climate, leaf litter chemistry and leaf litter decomposition in terrestrial ecosystems : a triangular relationship , 1997 .

[13]  William J. Parton,et al.  The CENTURY model , 1996 .

[14]  Effects of burial, stem portion and cultivar on the decomposition of canola straw , 1999 .

[15]  Andrea Ricca,et al.  Carbon and nitrogen dynamics along the decay continuum: Plant litter to soil organic matter , 1989, Plant and Soil.

[16]  C. Douglas,et al.  CQESTR: A model to estimate carbon sequestration in agricultural soils , 2001 .

[17]  Jane M. F. Johnson,et al.  Estimating Source Carbon from Crop Residues, Roots and Rhizodeposits Using the National Grain-Yield Database , 2006 .

[18]  D. Coleman,et al.  Budgets for root-derived C and litter-derived C: comparison between conventional tillage and no tillage soils , 2001 .

[19]  C. Madramootoo,et al.  Decomposition of grain-corn residues (Zea mays L.): A litterbag study under three tillage systems , 2002 .

[20]  S. Knapp,et al.  Cuphea: a new plant source of medium-chain fatty acids. , 1989, Critical reviews in food science and nutrition.

[21]  Robert L. Tate,et al.  Humic Substances in Soil and Crop Sciences: Selected Readings , 1991 .

[22]  Pete Smith The potential of US grazing lands to sequester carbon and mitigate the greenhouse effect , 2002 .

[23]  A. E. Thompson Cuphea — A Potential New Crop , 1984, HortScience.

[24]  R. Mulvaney Nitrogen-Inorganic Forms , 2018, SSSA Book Series.

[25]  B. Stewart,et al.  Assessment Methods for Soil Carbon , 2000 .

[26]  Jean L. Steiner,et al.  Decomposition and Nitrogen Dynamics of Crop Residues: Residue Quality and Water Effects , 1994 .

[27]  Mark A. Liebig,et al.  Biomass and carbon partitioning in switchgrass. , 2004 .

[28]  T. F. Morris,et al.  Long-term effects of tillage and corn stalk return on soil carbon dynamics , 2005 .

[29]  Jimmy R. Williams,et al.  Simulating soil C dynamics with EPIC: Model description and testing against long-term data , 2006 .

[30]  David S. Powlson,et al.  Evaluation of Soil Organic Matter Models , 1996 .

[31]  A. Moretto,et al.  Decomposition and nutrient dynamic of leaf litter and roots from palatable and unpalatable grasses in a semi-arid grassland , 2001 .

[32]  W. L. Nelson,et al.  Soil fertility and fertilizers , 1957 .

[33]  R. Follett,et al.  Organic Carbon Pools in Grazing Land Soils , 2000 .

[34]  J. Baldock,et al.  Decomposition dynamics of plant materials in relation to nitrogen availability and biochemistry determined by NMR and wet-chemical analysis , 2004 .

[35]  Jakob Magid,et al.  Decomposition of plant residues of different quality in soil-DAISY model calibration and simulation based on experimental data , 2003 .

[36]  C. Hays,et al.  Potential production and environmental effects of switchgrass and traditional crops under current and greenhouse-altered climate in the central United States: a simulation study , 2000 .

[37]  G. E. Lang,et al.  A Critique of the Analytical Methods Used in Examining Decomposition Data Obtained From Litter Bags , 1982 .

[38]  F. Ghidey,et al.  RESIDUE TYPE AND PLACEMENT EFFECTS ON DECOMPOSITION: FIELD STUDY AND MODEL EVALUATION , 1993 .

[39]  D. R. Linden,et al.  Corn-Residue Transformations into Root and Soil Carbon as Related to Nitrogen, Tillage, and Stover Management , 2004 .

[40]  I. Alexander,et al.  Plant Root Systems. Their Function and Interaction with the Soil. , 1978 .

[41]  S. Hansen,et al.  Simulation of nitrogen dynamics and biomass production in winter wheat using the Danish simulation model DAISY , 1991, Fertilizer research.

[42]  M. Klug,et al.  Characterization and differentiation of filamentous fungi based on Fatty Acid composition , 1996, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[43]  C. Cambardella,et al.  Carbon Dynamics of Surface Residue– and Root‐derived Organic Matter under Simulated No‐till , 2000 .

[44]  Jürgen K. Friedel,et al.  Review of mechanisms and quantification of priming effects. , 2000 .

[45]  A. Gorissen,et al.  Decomposition of leaf and root tissue of three perennial grass species grown at two levels of atmospheric CO2 and N supply , 2000, Plant and Soil.

[46]  J. Anderson,et al.  Plant litter quality and decomposition: an historical overview , 1997 .

[47]  Samuel L. Tisdale,et al.  Soil Fertility and Fertilizers , 1957 .

[48]  D. Reicosky,et al.  Long-Term Corn Residue Effects: Harvest Alternatives, Soil Carbon Turnover, and Root-Derived Carbon , 2004 .

[49]  D. Sparks,et al.  Methods of soil analysis. Part 3 - chemical methods. , 1996 .

[50]  Everard J. Edwards,et al.  Root production is determined by radiation flux in a temperate grassland community , 2004 .