Patient experiences and willingness-to-pay for cardiac telerehabilitation during the first surge of the COVID-19 pandemic: single-centre experience

Abstract Background The first surge of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic led to a shutdown of all non-urgent medical services such as cardiac rehabilitation. Therefore, centres had to develop remote and innovative ways to deliver the core components of CR during this shutdown. This increase in usage of remote rehabilitation services provides a chance to assess patients' experiences and willingness-to-pay of remote CR sessions. Methods This was a prospective single-centre study. From 17 July 2020, to 19 August 2020, we conducted an anonymous survey about the patient experiences of the cardiac telerehabilitation services provided at Jessa Hospital Hasselt during the COVID-19 pandemic. A link to an electronic questionnaire was sent via email to 155 patients who were invited to participate in the cardiac telerehabilitation sessions during the closure of the rehabilitation centre due to COVID-19. Results Fifty-five patients (35% of all invited patients) did participate in remote CR and completed the questionnaire. The mean age of the respondents was 65.4 ± 10.5 years, 63% were male and 70% of the participants were retired. A total of 91% possessed a smartphone and all those patients used their smartphone regularly to send text messages. Ninety-four per cent of the participants were satisfied with the provided telerehabilitation sessions and 70% of the participants would be prepared to pay for these sessions like for centre-based CR sessions. Twenty per cent of patients would even prefer the telerehabilitation sessions above centre-based CR sessions. Conclusion Most patients believed that remote CR could be an option after the COVID-19 pandemic when it is combined with centre-based CR sessions. Patients are willing to pay the same amount for a telerehabilitation session as a centre-based CR session. This demonstrates that highly motivated patients are open to shift certain parts of CR from face-to-face interactions to digital interactions.

[1]  M. Kohzuki,et al.  Cost-Effectiveness of Cardiac Rehabilitation in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease: A Meta-Analysis , 2019, Cardiology research and practice.

[2]  P. Doherty,et al.  Does the timing of cardiac rehabilitation impact fitness outcomes? An observational analysis , 2016, Open Heart.

[3]  Goran Krstačić,et al.  ESC e-Cardiology Working Group Position Paper: Overcoming challenges in digital health implementation in cardiovascular medicine , 2019, European journal of preventive cardiology.

[4]  Katrin Jensen,et al.  The prognostic effect of cardiac rehabilitation in the era of acute revascularisation and statin therapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized and non-randomized studies – The Cardiac Rehabilitation Outcome Study (CROS) , 2016, European journal of preventive cardiology.

[5]  A. Cohen-Solal,et al.  Secondary prevention through comprehensive cardiovascular rehabilitation: From knowledge to implementation. 2020 update. A position paper from the Secondary Prevention and Rehabilitation Section of the European Association of Preventive Cardiology. , 2020, European journal of preventive cardiology.

[6]  G. Boysen,et al.  European Guidelines on Cardiovascular Disease Prevention , 2009, International journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society.

[7]  Ian Graham,et al.  EUROPEAN GUIDELINES ON CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE PREVENTION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE , 2005 .

[8]  A. Hoes,et al.  [Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice]. , 2005, Revue medicale de Liege.

[9]  Sally J. Singh,et al.  Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation for adults with heart failure. , 2019, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[10]  D. Alter,et al.  Delays in Referral and Enrolment Are Associated With Mitigated Benefits of Cardiac Rehabilitation After Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery , 2015, Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes.

[11]  R. Taylor,et al.  Home-based versus centre-based cardiac rehabilitation. , 2017, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[12]  Paul Dendale,et al.  A review of telerehabilitation for cardiac patients , 2015, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[13]  Paul Dendale,et al.  Use of cardiac telerehabilitation during COVID-19 pandemic in Belgium , 2020, Acta cardiologica.