The Effects of Strategic Supplier Selection on Buyer Competitive Performance in Matched Domains: Does Supplier Integration Mediate the Relationships?

This research examines whether the strategic selection of suppliers based on supplier new product development capability, supplier quality capability and supplier cost capability directly and/or indirectly enhances the buyer's competitive performance capabilities in the matched domains of buyer product innovation, buyer quality and buyer competitive pricing, respectively. The resource-based view of the firm is used to frame the direct effects of strategic supplier selection as the capability of a buyer to select a supplier with resources and expertise in a specified domain should enhance the buyer's performance capability in the “matched” domain (but not necessarily buyer performance in “unmatched” domains). Two supplier integration mechanisms — supplier partnerships and supplier development — are modeled as potential mediators, implying indirect paths. The research hypotheses focus on both direct and indirect effects for each of the matched domains, but do not posit relationships across different domains. For example, supplier selection for new product development capability should impact buyer product innovation (matched domains), but should not necessarily impact buyer quality capability (unmatched domains). The direct effects of strategic supplier selection on buyer performance are supported in each matched domain; however, the indirect effects through supplier integration are not significant for the matched domains. The results identify strategic supplier selection as a promising source of competitive advantage in the resource-based view sense. In contrast, supplier development and supplier partnership do not provide performance benefits in a given domain above those arising from strategic supplier selection in the same domain; i.e., it is the nature of the resources selected that is key to competitive advantage.

[1]  D. Teece,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES AND STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1997 .

[2]  C. Monge,et al.  Determining the importance of the supplier selection process in manufacturing: a case study , 2004 .

[3]  B. Muthén,et al.  How to Use a Monte Carlo Study to Decide on Sample Size and Determine Power , 2002 .

[4]  George A. Marcoulides,et al.  Product development practices and performance: A structural equation modeling-based multi-group analysis , 2006 .

[5]  T. S. Ragu-Nathan,et al.  Exploring work system practices for time-based manufacturers: their impact on competitive capabilities , 2000 .

[6]  N. Sanders,et al.  MODELING THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN FIRM IT CAPABILITY, COLLABORATION, AND PERFORMANCE , 2005 .

[7]  Harbir Singh,et al.  Learning and protection of proprietary assets in strategic alliances: building relational capital , 2000 .

[8]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .

[9]  Mark A. Vonderembse,et al.  Concurrent engineering and its consequences , 2001 .

[10]  Michael A. Hitt.  Relevance of Strategic Management Theory and Research for Supply Chain Management , 2011 .

[11]  R. Handfield,et al.  Supplier integration into new product development: coordinating product, process and supply chain design , 2005 .

[12]  Augustine A. Lado,et al.  Inter‐organizational communication as a relational competency: Antecedents and performance outcomes in collaborative buyer–supplier relationships , 2008 .

[13]  Rosanna Garcia,et al.  The Effects of Environmental Turbulence on New Product Development Strategy Planning , 2003 .

[14]  I. Chen,et al.  Strategic buyer-supplier relationships, information technology and external logistics integration , 2007 .

[15]  Phillip L. Carter,et al.  SUPPLIER INNOVATIVENESS AND THE ROLE OF INTERORGANIZATIONAL LEARNING IN ENHANCING MANUFACTURER CAPABILITIES , 2008 .

[16]  R. Narasimhan,et al.  An Empirical Investigation of the Contribution of Strategic Sourcing to Manufacturing Flexibilities and Performance , 1999 .

[17]  M. Hitt,et al.  Partner Selection in Emerging and Developed Market Contexts: Resource-Based and Organizational Learning Perspectives , 2000 .

[18]  Daniel R. Krause,et al.  Toward a measure of competitive priorities for purchasing , 2001 .

[19]  Xenophon Koufteros,et al.  Internal and External Integration for Product Development: The Contingency Effects of Uncertainty, Equivocality, and Platform Strategy , 2005, Decis. Sci..

[20]  Terry S. Overton,et al.  Estimating Nonresponse Bias in Mail Surveys , 1977 .

[21]  S. Vickery,et al.  The effects of internal versus external integration practices on time-based performance and overall firm performance , 2004 .

[22]  Paul D. Cousins,et al.  A Conceptual Model for Managing Long-term Inter-organisational Relationships , 2002 .

[23]  Thomas V. Scannell,et al.  UPSTREAM SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT AND COMPETITIVE PERFORMANCE IN THE AUTOMOTIVE SUPPLY INDUSTRY , 2000 .

[24]  J. Barney.  Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage , 1991 .

[25]  Karel Cool,et al.  Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage , 1989 .

[26]  Mark A. Vonderembse,et al.  The Impact of Supplier Selection Criteria and Supplier Involvement on Manufacturing Performance , 1999 .

[27]  S. S. Rao,et al.  SUPPLY MANAGEMENT, SUPPLY FLEXIBILITY AND PERFORMANCE OUTCOMES: AN EMPIRICAL INVESTIGATION OF MANUFACTURING FIRMS , 2010 .

[28]  R. Narasimhan,et al.  AN EMPIRICAL EXAMINATION OF THE UNDERLYING DIMENSIONS OF PURCHASING COMPETENCE , 2001 .

[29]  Richard R. Young,et al.  Supplier Assistance Within Supplier Development Initiatives , 2004 .

[30]  B. Kogut.  The network as knowledge : Generative rules and the emergence of structure , 2000 .

[31]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[32]  R. Narasimhan,et al.  Supplier integration—Finding an optimal configuration , 2006 .

[33]  S. Vickery,et al.  The effects of an integrative supply chain strategy on customer service and financial performance: an analysis of direct versus indirect relationships , 2003 .

[34]  D. Littler,et al.  Factors Affecting the Process of Collaborative Product Development: A Study of UK Manufacturers of Information and Communications Technology Products , 1995 .

[35]  Nathalie Fabbe-Costes,et al.  Supply Chain Integration and Performance - A Review of the Evidence , 2008 .

[36]  Thomas Y. Choi,et al.  An exploration of supplier selection practices across the supply chain , 1996 .

[37]  Jeffrey H. Dyer,et al.  The Relational View: Cooperative Strategy and Sources of Interorganizational Competitive Advantage , 1998 .

[38]  J. Barney.  Resource-based theories of competitive advantage: A ten-year retrospective on the resource-based view , 2001 .

[39]  Mari Sako,et al.  Supplier development at Honda, Nissan and Toyota: comparative case studies of organizational capability enhancement , 2004 .

[40]  W. Powell,et al.  Interorganizational Collaboration and the Locus of Innovation: Networks of Learning in Biotechnology. , 1996 .

[41]  Paul D. Cousins,et al.  Supply base rationalisation: myth or reality? , 1999 .

[42]  Cornelia Dröge,et al.  Collaborating for new product development: Selecting the partner with maximum potential to create value , 2006 .

[43]  B. Kogut.  The Stability of Joint Ventures: Reciprocity and Competitive Rivalry , 1989 .

[44]  David T. Wilson,et al.  Buyer-supplier relationships today , 1993 .

[45]  Daniel R. Krause,et al.  BUYER–SUPPLIER RELATIONSHIPS: DERIVED VALUE OVER TWO DECADES , 2008 .

[46]  Margaret A. Peteraf.  The cornerstones of competitive advantage: A resource‐based view , 1993 .

[47]  Mark Strom,et al.  Model of Co-Development Emerges , 2002 .

[48]  H. Bozdogan.  Model selection and Akaike's Information Criterion (AIC): The general theory and its analytical extensions , 1987 .

[49]  Sachin B. Modi,et al.  Supplier development: Improving supplier performance through knowledge transfer , 2007 .

[50]  P. Ring,et al.  Structuring cooperative relationships between organizations , 1992 .

[51]  P. Bentler,et al.  Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis : Conventional criteria versus new alternatives , 1999 .

[52]  Daniel R. Krause,et al.  Social capital configuration, legal bonds and performance in buyer–supplier relationships , 2011 .

[53]  B. Wernerfelt,et al.  A Resource-Based View of the Firm , 1984 .

[54]  Thomas H. Brush,et al.  Comparing the resource-based and relational views: Knowledge transfer and spillover in vertical alliances , 2008 .

[55]  Steven Nahmias,et al.  RATIONALIZATION OF THE SUPPLIER BASE IN THE PRESENCE OF YIELD UNCERTAINTY , 1997 .

[56]  Roger Calantone,et al.  A Structural Analysis of the Effectiveness of Buying Firms' Strategies to Improve Supplier Performance , 2000, Decis. Sci..

[57]  Mark A. Vonderembse,et al.  Integrated product development practices and competitive capabilities: the effects of uncertainty, equivocality, and platform strategy , 2002 .

[58]  J. Hunter,et al.  On the Assessment of Unidimensional Measurement: Internal and External Consistency, and Overall Consistency Criteria , 1987 .

[59]  D. Mowery,et al.  Strategic alliances and interfirm knowledge transfer , 1996 .

[60]  M. Kotabe,et al.  Gaining from vertical partnerships : Knowledge transfer, relationship duration and supplier performance improvement in the U.S. and Japanese automotive industries , 2003 .

[61]  Thomas Y. Choi,et al.  Supply‐chain linkages and operational performance: A resource‐based‐view perspective , 2003 .

[62]  Mark S. Granovetter.  Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness , 1985, American Journal of Sociology.

[63]  Sabine Matook,et al.  Supplier development with benchmarking as part of a comprehensive supplier risk management framework , 2009 .

[64]  Richard A. D'Aveni,et al.  New Organizational Forms and Strategies for Managing in Hypercompetitive Environments , 1996 .

[65]  W. C. Benton,et al.  Power Influences in the Supply Chain , 2000 .

[66]  Augustine A. Lado,et al.  Strategic purchasing, supply management, and firm performance , 2004 .

[67]  Ram Narasimhan,et al.  Is Purchasing Really Strategic , 1996 .

[68]  R. Greenwood,et al.  Entrepreneurship and the Evolution of Angel Financial Networks , 2000 .

[69]  Nathalie Fabbe-Costes,et al.  Supply Chain Integration improves performance - The emperor’s new suit? , 2007 .

[70]  J. Barney.  Strategic Factor Markets: Expectations, Luck, and Business Strategy , 1986 .

[71]  Chekitan S. Dev,et al.  A Market-Based Approach for Partner Selection in Marketing Alliances , 1996 .

[72]  J. Barney,et al.  CAPABILITIES, BUSINESS PROCESSES, AND COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: CHOOSING THE DEPENDENT VARIABLE IN EMPIRICAL TESTS OF THE RESOURCE-BASED VIEW , 2004 .

[73]  Keith W. Glaister.  UK-Western European Strategic Alliances , 1996 .

[74]  Gary L. Ragatz,et al.  TIMING AND EXTENT OF SUPPLIER INTEGRATION IN NEW PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT: A CONTINGENCY APPROACH , 2008 .

[75]  R. Narasimhan,et al.  Managing beyond the factory walls: Effects of four types of strategic integration on manufacturing plant performance , 2007 .

[76]  Sameer Kumar,et al.  Managing supplier relationships , 2003 .

[77]  H. Akaike.  Factor analysis and AIC , 1987 .

[78]  B. Uzzi,et al.  The Sources and Consequences of Embeddedness for the Economic Performance of Organizations: The Network Effect , 1996 .

[79]  Cristóbal Sánchez-Rodríguez.  Effect of strategic purchasing on supplier development and performance: a structural model , 2009 .

[80]  Thomas Y. Choi,et al.  The Supply Base and Its Complexity: Implications For Transaction Costs, Risks, Responsiveness, and Innovation , 2006 .

[81]  K. Lai,et al.  “Black‐box” and “gray‐box” supplier integration in product development: Antecedents, consequences and the moderating role of firm size , 2007 .

[82]  Mark A. Vonderembse,et al.  Examining the Competitive Capabilities of Manufacturing Firms , 2002 .

[83]  G. Ahuja.  Collaboration Networks, Structural Holes, and Innovation: A Longitudinal Study , 1998 .

[84]  Christopher J. Hopwood,et al.  Moderation and Mediation in Structural Equation Modeling: Applications for Early Intervention Research , 2007 .

[85]  M. Naim,et al.  Supply chain integration using a maturity scale , 2008 .

[86]  S. Deshmukh,et al.  Vendor Selection Using Interpretive Structural Modelling (ISM) , 1994 .

[87]  P. Jonsson,et al.  Obstacles to supply chain integration of the performance management process in buyer-supplier dyads: The buyers' perspective , 2009 .

[88]  Carol Saunders,et al.  PLS: A Silver Bullet? , 2006 .

[89]  John N. Pearson,et al.  Strategically managed buyer–supplier relationships and performance outcomes , 1999 .

[90]  Daniel R. Krause,et al.  The relationships between supplier development, commitment, social capital accumulation and performance improvement , 2007 .

[91]  C. Saunders,et al.  Editor's comments: PLS: a silver bullet? , 2006 .

[92]  Gianni Lorenzoni,et al.  The leveraging of interfirm relationships as a distinctive organizational capability: a longitudinal study , 1999 .

[93]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  Resource-based View of Strategic Alliance Formation: Strategic and Social Effects in Entrepreneurial Firms , 1996 .