What Users Actually Do in a Social Tagging System

Social tagging systems have established themselves as an important part in today’s Web and have attracted the interest of our research community in a variety of investigations. Henceforth, several aspects of social tagging systems have been discussed and assumptions have emerged on which our community builds their work. Yet, testing such assumptions has been difficult due to the absence of suitable usage data in the past. In this work, we thoroughly investigate and evaluate four aspects about tagging systems, covering social interaction, retrieval of posted resources, the importance of the three different types of entities, users, resources, and tags, as well as connections between these entities’ popularity in posted and in requested content. For that purpose, we examine live server log data gathered from the real-world, public social tagging system BibSonomy. Our empirical results paint a mixed picture about the four aspects. Although typical assumptions hold to a certain extent for some, other aspects need to be reflected in a very critical light. Our observations have implications for the understanding of social tagging systems and the way they are used on the Web. We make the dataset used in this work available to other researchers.

[1]  Paul Thomas,et al.  Using Interaction Data to Explain Difficulty Navigating Online , 2014, TWEB.

[2]  Djoerd Hiemstra,et al.  Analysis of Search and Browsing Behavior of Young Users on the Web , 2014, TWEB.

[3]  Yong-Yeol Ahn,et al.  Analyzing the Video Popularity Characteristics of Large-Scale User Generated Content Systems , 2009, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking.

[4]  Jenny Fry,et al.  Measuring researchers’ use of scholarly information through social bookmarking data: A case study of BibSonomy , 2012, J. Inf. Sci..

[5]  Andreas Hotho,et al.  Information Retrieval in Folksonomies: Search and Ranking , 2006, ESWC.

[6]  Valentin Robu,et al.  The complex dynamics of collaborative tagging , 2007, WWW '07.

[7]  Andreas Hotho,et al.  On Publication Usage in a Social Bookmarking System , 2015, WebSci.

[8]  Giorgio Maria Di Nunzio,et al.  Web log analysis: a review of a decade of studies about information acquisition, inspection and interpretation of user interaction , 2011, Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery.

[9]  Christopher H. Brooks,et al.  Improved annotation of the blogosphere via autotagging and hierarchical clustering , 2006, WWW '06.

[10]  Stefano Mossa,et al.  Truncation of power law behavior in "scale-free" network models due to information filtering. , 2002, Physical review letters.

[11]  Mike Thelwall,et al.  Mendeley readership altmetrics for medical articles: An analysis of 45 fields , 2016, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[12]  David Nicholas,et al.  Scholarly journal usage: the results of deep log analysis , 2005, J. Documentation.

[13]  Mor Naaman,et al.  HT06, tagging paper, taxonomy, Flickr, academic article, to read , 2006, HYPERTEXT '06.

[14]  Andreas Hotho,et al.  Of course we share! Testing Assumptions about Social Tagging Systems , 2014, ArXiv.

[15]  Jennifer Trant,et al.  Studying Social Tagging and Folksonomy: A Review and Framework , 2009, J. Digit. Inf..

[16]  Markus Strohmaier,et al.  Why do Users Tag? Detecting Users' Motivation for Tagging in Social Tagging Systems , 2010, ICWSM.

[17]  Andreas Hotho,et al.  How social is social tagging? , 2014, WWW '14 Companion.

[18]  D. Millen,et al.  Using Social Tagging to Improve Social Navigation , 2022 .

[19]  Andreas Hotho,et al.  Informationelle Selbstbestimmung im Web 2.0 - Chancen und Risiken sozialer Verschlagwortungssysteme , 2013, Xpert.press.

[20]  Maria Gäde,et al.  Is tagging multilingual?: a case study with BibSonomy , 2011, JCDL '11.

[21]  Virgílio A. F. Almeida,et al.  Characterizing user behavior in online social networks , 2009, IMC '09.

[22]  Dominik Benz,et al.  The social bookmark and publication management system bibsonomy , 2010, The VLDB Journal.

[23]  A.P.J. van den Bosch,et al.  Recommender Systems for Social Bookmarking , 2005 .

[24]  Christian Wolff,et al.  Personal Information Management vs. Resource Sharing: Towards a Model of Information Behaviour in Social Tagging Systems , 2009, ICWSM 2009.

[25]  Vittorio Loreto,et al.  Network properties of folksonomies , 2007, AI Commun..

[26]  Meng Yang,et al.  Social bookmarking and exploratory search , 2007, ECSCW.

[27]  Peter M. Todd,et al.  Analysis of Music Tagging and Listening Patterns: Do Tags Really Function as Retrieval Aids? , 2015, SBP.

[28]  Laurie E. Damianos,et al.  Exploring the Adoption, Utility, and Social Influences of Social Bookmarking in a Corporate Environment , 2007, 2007 40th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'07).

[29]  Gerd Stumme,et al.  The Role of Cores in Recommender Benchmarking for Social Bookmarking Systems , 2016, ACM Trans. Intell. Syst. Technol..

[30]  Mark E. J. Newman,et al.  Power-Law Distributions in Empirical Data , 2007, SIAM Rev..

[31]  Andreas Hotho,et al.  The anti-social tagger: detecting spam in social bookmarking systems , 2008, AIRWeb '08.

[32]  Lars Schmidt-Thieme,et al.  Learning optimal ranking with tensor factorization for tag recommendation , 2009, KDD.

[33]  Arkaitz Zubiaga,et al.  Tags vs shelves: from social tagging to social classification , 2011, HT '11.

[34]  Fabio Crestani,et al.  A statistical comparison of tag and query logs , 2009, SIGIR.

[35]  Bernardo A. Huberman,et al.  Usage patterns of collaborative tagging systems , 2006, J. Inf. Sci..

[36]  Andreas Hotho,et al.  Tag recommendations in social bookmarking systems , 2008, AI Commun..

[37]  DoerfelStephan,et al.  What Users Actually Do in a Social Tagging System , 2016 .

[38]  Ben Y. Zhao,et al.  Understanding latent interactions in online social networks , 2010, IMC '10.

[39]  Harith Alani,et al.  The CKC Challenge: Exploring Tools for Collaborative Knowledge Construction , 2008, IEEE Intelligent Systems.

[40]  Mor Naaman,et al.  Why we tag: motivations for annotation in mobile and online media , 2007, CHI.

[41]  Adam Mathes,et al.  Folksonomies-Cooperative Classification and Communication Through Shared Metadata , 2004 .

[42]  Michael Cardew-Hall,et al.  The folksonomy tag cloud: when is it useful? , 2008, J. Inf. Sci..

[43]  David Weinberger,et al.  Tagging and Why it Matters , 2005 .

[44]  Paul P. Maglio,et al.  Categorization in the wild , 2008, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[45]  Mark H. Chignell,et al.  Information archiving with bookmarks: personal Web space construction and organization , 1998, CHI.

[46]  Christos Faloutsos,et al.  Patterns in Interactive Tagging Networks , 2015, ICWSM.

[47]  Anja Feldmann,et al.  Understanding online social network usage from a network perspective , 2009, IMC '09.

[48]  Wai-Tat Fu,et al.  Semantic imitation in social tagging , 2010, TCHI.

[49]  Mary Beth Rosson,et al.  Exploring Out-of-turn Interactions with Websites , 2009, J. Digit. Inf..

[50]  Dominik Benz,et al.  Community Assessment Using Evidence Networks , 2010, MSM/MUSE.