Late patch test reaction to Disperse Orange 1 not related to active sensitization

One of the most important adverse consequences of patch testing is active sensitization, when subjects previously not allergic become sensitized to one or more of the test chemicals by the test procedure. The allergic test reaction then shows up about 10 or more days (late reaction) after the test application. Sometimes, however, late reactions are seen without active sensitization being present, as some allergens are known to give late reactions in the absence of active sensitization. Here, we describe a female patient shown to be allergic to Disperse Orange 1 from previous patch testing, who was only positive at patch test readings on D7 on the first test occasion and on D14 when patch tested repeatedly.

[1]  B. Gruvberger,et al.  Patch testing with a textile dye mix in a baseline series in two countries. , 2011, Acta dermato-venereologica.

[2]  R. Stahlmann,et al.  Investigation of the sensitising and cross-sensitising potential of textile dyes and β-lactam antibiotics using a biphasic mice local lymph node assay , 2009, Archives of Toxicology.

[3]  E. Zimerson,et al.  Screening for acrylate/methacrylate allergy in the baseline series: our experience in Sweden and Singapore , 2008, Contact dermatitis.

[4]  D. Gawkrodger,et al.  Late patch test reactions: delayed immune response appears to be more common than active sensitization , 2008, Contact dermatitis.

[5]  B. Gruvberger,et al.  Chemical investigations of disperse dyes in patch test preparations , 2008, Contact dermatitis.

[6]  A. Goossens,et al.  Late reactions to para‐phenylenediamine are not always an indication of active sensitization: an example , 2008, Contact dermatitis.

[7]  E. Zimerson,et al.  How to optimize patch testing with diphenylmethane diisocyanate , 2007, Contact dermatitis.

[8]  K. Alanko,et al.  Late reactions in patch tests: a 4‐year review from a clinic of occupational dermatology , 2007, Contact dermatitis.

[9]  K. Andersen,et al.  Retrospective evaluation of the consequence of alleged patch test sensitization , 2006, Contact dermatitis.

[10]  J. Geier,et al.  Late reactions to the patch‐test preparations para‐phenylenediamine and epoxy resin: a prospective multicentre investigation of the German Contact Dermatitis Research Group , 2006, The British journal of dermatology.

[11]  M. Bruze,et al.  Late patch-test reactions to budesonide need not be a sign of sensitization induced by the test procedure. , 2003, American journal of contact dermatitis : official journal of the American Contact Dermatitis Society.

[12]  A. Goossens,et al.  Thoughts on sensitizers in a standard patch test series , 1999, Contact dermatitis.

[13]  M. Bruze,et al.  Individual variation in nickel patch test reactivity. , 1999, American journal of contact dermatitis : official journal of the American Contact Dermatitis Society.

[14]  H. Möller,et al.  The development and course of test reactions to gold sodium thiosulfate , 1995, Contact dermatitis.

[15]  M. Bruze Simultaneous patch test sensitization to 4 chemically unrelated compounds in a standard test series , 1984, Contact dermatitis.