How Low Can We Go in Radiation Dose for the Data-Completion Scan on a Research Whole-Body Photon-Counting Computed Tomography System

Purpose A research photon-counting computed tomography (CT) system that consists of an energy-integrating detector (EID) and a photon-counting detector (PCD) was installed in our laboratory. The scanning fields of view of the EID and PCD at the isocenter are 500 and 275 mm, respectively. When objects are larger than the PCD scanning field of view, a data-completion scan (DCS) using the EID subsystem is needed to avoid truncation artifacts in PCD images. The goals of this work were to (1) find the impact of a DCS on noise of PCD images and (2) determine the lowest possible dose for a DCS such that truncation artifacts are negligible in PCD images. Methods First, 2 semianthropomorphic abdomen phantoms were scanned on the PCD subsystem. For each PCD scan, we acquired 1 DCS with the maximum effective mAs and 5 with lower effective mAs values. The PCD image reconstructed using the maximum effective mAs was considered as the reference image, and those using the lower effective mAs as the test images. The PCD image reconstructed without a DCS was considered the baseline image. Each PCD image was assessed in terms of noise and CT number uniformity; the results were compared among the baseline, test, and reference images. Finally, the impact of a DCS on PCD image quality was qualitatively assessed for other body regions using an anthropomorphic torso phantom. Results The DCS had a negligible impact on the noise magnitude in the PCD images. The PCD images with the minimum available dose (CTDIvol < 2 mGy) showed greatly enhanced CT number uniformity compared with the baseline images without noticeable truncation artifacts. Further increasing the effective mAs of a DCS did not yield noticeable improvement in CT number uniformity. Conclusions A DCS using the minimum available dose had negligible effect on image noise and was sufficient to maintain satisfactory CT number uniformity for the PCD scans.

[1]  W D McDavid,et al.  Extraction of information from CT scans at different energies. , 1979, Medical physics.

[2]  K. Bae,et al.  Efficient correction for CT image artifacts caused by objects extending outside the scan field of view. , 2000, Medical physics.

[3]  M. Glas,et al.  Principles of Computerized Tomographic Imaging , 2000 .

[4]  J. Hsieh,et al.  A novel reconstruction algorithm to extend the CT scan field-of-view. , 2004, Medical physics.

[5]  K. Stierstorfer,et al.  Weighted FBP--a simple approximate 3D FBP algorithm for multislice spiral CT with good dose usage for arbitrary pitch. , 2004, Physics in medicine and biology.

[6]  Adam Wunderlich,et al.  Image covariance and lesion detectability in direct fan-beam x-ray computed tomography , 2008, Physics in medicine and biology.

[7]  Daniel Kolditz,et al.  Volume-of-interest (VOI) imaging in C-arm flat-detector CT for high image quality at reduced dose. , 2010, Medical physics.

[8]  320-multidetector row whole-head dynamic subtracted CT angiography and whole-brain CT perfusion before and after carotid artery stenting: technical note. , 2010, European journal of radiology.

[9]  Edgar Kraft,et al.  A research prototype system for quantum-counting clinical CT , 2010, Medical Imaging.

[10]  Dan Wang,et al.  Comparison of the accuracy of subtraction CT angiography performed on 320-detector row volume CT with conventional CT angiography for diagnosis of intracranial aneurysms. , 2012, European journal of radiology.

[11]  Thilo Hannemann,et al.  First results from a hybrid prototype CT scanner for exploring benefits of quantum-counting in clinical CT , 2012, Medical Imaging.

[12]  K. Taguchi,et al.  Vision 20/20: Single photon counting x-ray detectors in medical imaging. , 2013, Medical physics.

[13]  Andreas Maier,et al.  Approximate truncation robust computed tomography—ATRACT , 2013, Physics in medicine and biology.

[14]  Karl Stierstorfer,et al.  Multi-energy performance of a research prototype CT scanner with small-pixel counting detector , 2013, Medical Imaging.

[15]  Karl Stierstorfer,et al.  Photon counting CT at elevated X-ray tube currents: contrast stability, image noise and multi-energy performance , 2014, Medical Imaging.

[16]  Rolf Behling.  Modern Diagnostic X-Ray Sources : Technology, Manufacturing, Reliability , 2015 .

[17]  M. Kachelriess,et al.  Performance of today's dual energy CT and future multi energy CT in virtual non-contrast imaging and in iodine quantification: A simulation study. , 2015, Medical physics.

[18]  X Duan,et al.  Initial results from a prototype whole-body photon-counting computed tomography system , 2015, Medical Imaging.

[19]  P. Shikhaliev,et al.  Dual energy CT with photon counting and dual source systems: comparative evaluation , 2015, Physics in medicine and biology.

[20]  E. Ritman,et al.  Human Imaging With Photon Counting–Based Computed Tomography at Clinical Dose Levels: Contrast-to-Noise Ratio and Cadaver Studies , 2016, Investigative radiology.

[21]  Baiyu Chen,et al.  Evaluation of conventional imaging performance in a research whole-body CT system with a photon-counting detector array , 2016, Physics in medicine and biology.

[22]  Jan S. Iwanczyk,et al.  Radiation Detectors for Medical Imaging , 2016, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[23]  S. Awadalla.  Solid-State Radiation Detectors : Technology and Applications , 2017 .