Variable input observer for nonstationary high-rate dynamic systems

Engineering systems experiencing events of amplitudes higher than 100 g n for a duration under 100 ms, here termed high-rate dynamics, can undergo rapid damaging effects. If the structural health of such systems could be accurately estimated in a timely manner, preventative measures could be employed to minimize adverse effects. For complex high-rate problems, adaptive observers have shown promise due to their capability to deal with nonstationary, noisy, and uncertain systems. However, adaptive observers have slow convergence rates, which impede their applicability to the high-rate problems. To improve on the convergence rate, we propose a variable input space concept for optimizing the use of data history of high-rate dynamics, with the objective to produce an optimal representation of the system of interest. Using the embedding theory, the algorithm sequentially selects and adapts a vector of inputs that preserves the essential dynamics of the high-rate system. In this paper, the variable input space is integrated in a wavelet neural network, which constitutes a variable input observer. The observer is simulated using experimental data from a high-rate system. Different input space adaptation methods are studied, and the performance is also compared against an optimized fixed input strategy. It is found that a smooth transition of the input space eliminates error spikes and yields faster convergence. The variable input observer is further studied in a hybrid model-/data-driven formulation, and results demonstrate significant improvement in performance gained from the added physical knowledge.

[1]  Qinghua Zhang,et al.  Wavelet networks , 1992, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks.

[2]  K. Khayati,et al.  Adaptive observer for a large class of nonlinear systems with exponential convergence of parameter estimation , 2013, 2013 International Conference on Control, Decision and Information Technologies (CoDIT).

[3]  Simon Laflamme,et al.  Introduction to State Estimation of High-Rate System Dynamics , 2018, Sensors.

[4]  Gang Liu,et al.  Damage assessment with state–space embedding strategy and singular value decomposition under stochastic excitation , 2014 .

[5]  Carlos Serrano-Cinca,et al.  Self-organizing neural networks for the analysis and representation of data: Some financial cases , 1993, Neural Computing & Applications.

[6]  H. Abarbanel,et al.  Determining embedding dimension for phase-space reconstruction using a geometrical construction. , 1992, Physical review. A, Atomic, molecular, and optical physics.

[7]  Jia-Shu Zhang,et al.  Predicting Chaotic Time Series Using Recurrent Neural Network , 2000 .

[8]  Wan Kyun Chung,et al.  Design and Performance Tuning of Sliding-Mode Controller for High-Speed and High-Accuracy Positioning Systems in Disturbance Observer Framework , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[9]  Robert Babu Input Selection for Nonlinear Regression Models , 2004 .

[10]  J. Stark,et al.  Recursive prediction of chaotic time series , 1993 .

[11]  Jerome J. Connor,et al.  Self-organizing input space for control of structures , 2012 .

[12]  Jean-Jacques E. Slotine,et al.  Space-frequency localized basis function networks for nonlinear system estimation and control , 1995, Neurocomputing.

[13]  Goutam Chakraborty,et al.  Robust Unknown Input Observer for Nonlinear Systems and Its Application to Fault Detection and Isolation , 2008 .

[14]  Charles R. Farrar,et al.  A review of nonlinear dynamics applications to structural health monitoring , 2008 .

[15]  Jerome J. Connor,et al.  Structural Motion Engineering , 2014 .

[16]  Simon Laflamme,et al.  Damage detection on mesosurfaces using distributed sensor network and spectral diffusion maps , 2016 .

[17]  Simon Laflamme,et al.  Robust Variable Input Observer for Structural Health Monitoring of Systems Experiencing Harsh Extreme Environments , 2017 .

[18]  Dingli Yu,et al.  Neural model input selection for a MIMO chemical process , 2000 .

[19]  Jarkko Tikka,et al.  Simultaneous input variable and basis function selection for RBF networks , 2009, Neurocomputing.

[20]  M. Moraud Wavelet Networks , 2018, Foundations of Wavelet Networks and Applications.

[21]  Fraser,et al.  Independent coordinates for strange attractors from mutual information. , 1986, Physical review. A, General physics.

[22]  F. Takens Detecting strange attractors in turbulence , 1981 .

[23]  Lionel Tarassenko,et al.  Guide to Neural Computing Applications , 1998 .

[24]  Frequency independent automatic input variable selection for Neural Networks for forecasting , 2010, The 2010 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN).

[25]  M. Morari,et al.  A discrete adaptive observer and identifier with arbitrarily fast rate of convergence , 1982 .

[26]  Kazuyuki Aihara,et al.  Modeling dynamics from only output data. , 2009, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[27]  Gregory M. Shaver,et al.  Input observer convergence and robustness: Application to compression ratio estimation , 2013 .

[28]  Kang Li,et al.  Neural input selection - A fast model-based approach , 2007, Neurocomputing.

[29]  Teuvo Kohonen,et al.  The self-organizing map , 1990 .

[30]  Simon Laflamme,et al.  Input space dependent controller for civil structures exposed to multi-hazard excitations , 2018, Engineering Structures.

[31]  Vitor Hugo Ferreira,et al.  Input space to neural network based load forecasters , 2008 .

[32]  Simon Laflamme,et al.  Real-Time Variable Multidelay Controller for Multihazard Mitigation , 2018 .

[33]  Eugénio C. Ferreira,et al.  A study on the convergence of observer-based kinetics estimators in stirred tank bioreactors , 1996 .

[34]  Yan Wang,et al.  Observer design for differentiable Lipschitz nonlinear systems with time-varying parameters , 2014, 53rd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[35]  Jacob Dodson,et al.  Study of input space for state estimation of high‐rate dynamics , 2018 .

[36]  Jerome J. Connor,et al.  Wavelet Network for Semi-Active Control , 2011 .

[37]  S. Laflamme,et al.  Variable input observer for structural health monitoring of high-rate systems , 2017 .

[38]  Neil Davey,et al.  Time Series Prediction and Neural Networks , 2001, J. Intell. Robotic Syst..

[39]  P. Rapp,et al.  Comparative study of embedding methods. , 2003, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[40]  Sheng Chen,et al.  Model selection approaches for non-linear system identification: a review , 2008, Int. J. Syst. Sci..

[41]  Holger R. Maier,et al.  Input determination for neural network models in water resources applications. Part 1—background and methodology , 2005 .

[42]  Witold Byrski,et al.  On-line fast identification method and exact state observer for adaptive control of continuous system , 2014, Proceeding of the 11th World Congress on Intelligent Control and Automation.

[43]  Michael D. Todd,et al.  A multivariate, attractor-based approach to structural health monitoring , 2005 .

[44]  Hyungmin Kim,et al.  An Implantable Wireless Neural Interface System for Simultaneous Recording and Stimulation of Peripheral Nerve with a Single Cuff Electrode , 2017, Sensors.