Investigation into the effect that probe immobilisation method type has on the analytical signal of an EIS DNA biosensor.

The analytical performance of an enhanced surface area electrolyte insulator semiconductor (EIS) device was investigated for DNA sensor development. The work endeavored to advance EIS performance by monitoring the effect of DNA probe layers have on the impedimetric signal during target hybridisation detection. Two universally employed covalent chemistries, direct and spacer-mediated attachment of amino modified probe molecules to amino-functionalised surfaces were investigated. Relative areal densities of immobilised probe were measured on planar and enhanced surface area substrates using epi-fluorescence microscopy. The reproducibility of the each immobilisation method was seen to have a direct effect on the reproducibility of the impedimetric signal. The sensitivity and selectivity was seen to be dependent on the type of immobilisation method. Real time, impedimetric detection of target DNA hybridisation concentrations as low as 25 and 1 nM were possible. The impact that probe concentration had on the impedimetric signal for selective and non-selective interactions was also investigated.

[1]  R. Georgiadis,et al.  The effect of surface probe density on DNA hybridization. , 2001, Nucleic acids research.

[2]  Sara Tombelli,et al.  Quartz crystal microbalance (QCM) affinity biosensor for genetically modified organisms (GMOs) detection. , 2003, Biosensors & bioelectronics.

[3]  P. Sorger,et al.  Electronic detection of DNA by its intrinsic molecular charge , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[4]  A. Heller,et al.  Enzyme-amplified amperometric sandwich test for RNA and DNA. , 2002, Analytical chemistry.

[5]  G. Redmond,et al.  Formation and characterization of DNA microarrays at silicon nitride substrates. , 2005, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[6]  Joseph Wang,et al.  Metal nanoparticle-based electrochemical stripping potentiometric detection of DNA hybridization. , 2001, Analytical chemistry.

[7]  Microporous silicon and biosensor development: structural analysis, electrical characterisation and biocapacity evaluation. , 2005, Biosensors & bioelectronics.

[8]  John Alderman,et al.  A DNA diagnostic biosensor: development, characterisation and performance , 2000 .

[9]  M F Lawrence,et al.  Impedance-based detection of DNA sequences using a silicon transducer with PNA as the probe layer. , 2004, Nucleic acids research.

[10]  Ulrich J. Krull,et al.  Practical physical aspects of interfacial nucleic acid oligomer hybridisation for biosensor design , 2002 .

[11]  Ulrich J. Krull,et al.  Direct selective detection of genomic DNA from coliform using a fiber optic biosensor , 2002 .

[12]  P. Piunno,et al.  Influences of non-selective interactions of nucleic acids on response rates of nucleic acid fiber optic biosensors , 2001, Fresenius' journal of analytical chemistry.

[13]  A Mathewson,et al.  Dual polarisation interferometry characterisation of DNA immobilisation and hybridisation detection on a silanised support. , 2006, Biosensors & bioelectronics.

[14]  W. Liao,et al.  Achieving differentiation of single-base mutations through hairpin oligonucleotide and electric potential control. , 2003, Biosensors & bioelectronics.

[15]  Joseph Wang SURVEY AND SUMMARY From DNA biosensors to gene chips , 2000 .

[16]  E. Souteyrand,et al.  DIRECT DETECTION OF THE HYBRIDIZATION OF SYNTHETIC HOMO-OLIGOMER DNA SEQUENCES BY FIELD EFFECT , 1997 .

[17]  F. Uslu,et al.  Labelfree fully electronic nucleic acid detection system based on a field-effect transistor device. , 2004, Biosensors & bioelectronics.

[18]  Maria Minunni,et al.  Surface plasmon resonance biosensor for genetically modified organisms detection , 2002 .

[19]  T. G. Drummond,et al.  Electrochemical DNA sensors , 2003, Nature Biotechnology.

[20]  G. Redmond,et al.  A versatile multi-platform biochip surface attachment chemistry , 2003 .

[21]  Nicole Jaffrezic-Renault,et al.  Direct immunosensing using differential electrochemical measurements of impedimetric variations , 1997 .

[22]  Eliane Souteyrand,et al.  Use of microtechnology for DNA chips implementation , 2000 .

[23]  I. Willner,et al.  Electronic transduction of DNA sensing processes on surfaces: amplification of DNA detection and analysis of single-base mismatches by tagged liposomes. , 2001, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[24]  Elizabeth M. Boon,et al.  Mutation detection by electrocatalysis at DNA-modified electrodes , 2000, Nature Biotechnology.

[25]  M F Lawrence,et al.  Immobilization of homooligonucleotide probe layers onto Si/SiO(2) substrates: characterization by electrochemical impedance measurements and radiolabelling. , 2002, Biosensors & bioelectronics.

[26]  H. Lang,et al.  Multiple label-free biodetection and quantitative DNA-binding assays on a nanomechanical cantilever array , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[27]  Xin Sheng Zhao,et al.  Monitoring DNA hybridization on alkyl modified silicon surface through capacitance measurement. , 2003, Biosensors & bioelectronics.