This paper takes the NATO SAS-050 Approach Space, a widely accepted model of command and control, and gives each of its primary axes a quantitative measure using social network analysis. This means that the actual point in the approach space adopted by real-life command and control organizations can be plotted along with the way in which that point varies over time and function. Part 1 of the paper presents the rationale behind this innovation and how it was subject to verification using theoretical data. Part 2 shows how the enhanced approach space was put to use in the context of a large scale military command post exercise. Agility is represented by the number of distinct areas in the approach space that the organization was able to occupy and there was a marked disparity between where the organization thought it should be and where it actually was, furthermore, agility varied across function. The humans in this particular scenario bestowed upon the organization the levels of agility that were observed, thus the findings are properly considered from a socio-technical perspective.
[1]
H. Leavitt.
Some effects of certain communication patterns on group performance.
,
1951,
Journal of abnormal psychology.
[2]
Frank Harary,et al.
Graph Theory
,
2016
.
[3]
M. Mitchell Waldrop,et al.
Complexity : the emerging science and the edge of order and chaos
,
1992
.
[4]
Neville A Stanton,et al.
Command and control in emergency services operations: a social network analysis
,
2006,
Ergonomics.
[5]
John Scott.
What is social network analysis
,
2010
.
[6]
Richard E. Hayes,et al.
Understanding Command and Control
,
2011
.
[7]
Alex Bavelas.
A Mathematical Model for Group Structures
,
1948
.