Research Training and Supervision Development

Research education, or training, as it is often termed, is attracting greater scrutiny as research itself is seen of greater importance in the global knowledge economy. In turn, concerns to improve the effectiveness and efficiency of research supervision are leading to the introduction and extension of programmes for supervisor development. This article presents a framework for an approach to supervisor development, based on the assumption that in order to discuss supervisor development it is important to understand what supervisors do and why. The article examines the nature of the educative process for research students in the current research environment. It articulates the generic processes supervisors need to engage in for effective supervision, if students are to develop in differing institutional, disciplinary and professional contexts the appropriate expertise and attributes for employment; and presents an outline of what might constitute a flexible professional development programme for supervisors in this context.

[1]  Margot Pearson,et al.  The Changing Environment for Doctoral Education in Australia: Implications for Quality Management, Improvement and Innovation. , 1999 .

[2]  Roderick M. Kramer,et al.  Divergent Realities and Convergent Disappointments in the Hierarchic Relation: Trust and the Intuitive Auditor at Work , 1996 .

[3]  D. Guile.  Beyond the Institution of Apprenticeship: towards a social theory of learning as the production of knowledge , 2002 .

[4]  Margot Pearson,et al.  Professionalising Ph.D. education to enhance the quality of the student experience , 1996 .

[5]  Jules B. Lapidus,et al.  Doctoral Education: Preparing for the Future. , 1997 .

[6]  Mike Pedler,et al.  A Manager's Guide to Self Development , 1986 .

[7]  Susan E. Newman,et al.  Cognitive Apprenticeship: Teaching the Craft of Reading, Writing, and Mathematics. Technical Report No. 403. , 1987 .

[8]  Achieving a PhD: Ten Students' Experience , 1994 .

[9]  Ronald Barnett,et al.  Higher Education: A Critical Business , 1997 .

[10]  S. Harris.  The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization, by Peter Senge, New York: Doubleday/Currency, 1990 , 1990 .

[11]  Margaret Kiley,et al.  Quality in postgraduate research: Making ends meet , 2000 .

[12]  R. Johnston.  The Changing Nature and Forms of Knowledge: A Review , 2010 .

[13]  Tony Becher,et al.  Academic Tribes and Territories: Intellectual Enquiry and the Cultures of Disciplines , 2001 .

[14]  R. Connell.  How to Supervise a Ph.D. , 1985 .

[15]  David Boud,et al.  Appreciating adults learning : from the learners' perspective , 1987 .

[16]  E. Holdaway.  Current Issues in Graduate Education. , 1996 .

[17]  A. Brew.  Conceptions of Research: A phenomenographic study , 2001 .

[18]  Flexible postgraduate research supervision in an open system , 2000 .

[19]  R. West,et al.  Learning for Life: Review of Higher Education Financing and Policy , 1998 .

[20]  Donald A. Schön,et al.  Theory in Practice: Increasing Professional Effectiveness , 1974 .

[21]  Paul Atkinson,et al.  Critical mass and doctoral research: Reflections on the Harris report , 1997 .

[22]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity , 1998 .

[23]  D. Pugh,et al.  How to Get a PhD: A Handbook for Students and Their Supervisors , 1994 .