There is a significant motivation to implement an unconditionally stable scheme in the pseudodynamic test method. As more complex experiments with many degrees of freedom are tested, explicit time integration methods limit the size of time step on the basis of the highest natural frequency of the system. This is true even though the response of the structure may be dominated by a few lower frequency modes. The limit on step size is undesirable because it physically increases the duration of a test, but more importantly, because the number of steps to completion increases and error propagation problems increase with the number of steps in a test. In addition, incremental displacements within each step become smaller, introducing the potential for problems associated with stress relaxation. An unconditionally stable algorithm allows the time step to be selected to give accurate response in the modes of interest without regard for higher mode characteristics.
[1]
T. Hughes,et al.
Collocation, dissipation and [overshoot] for time integration schemes in structural dynamics
,
1978
.
[2]
Pui-Shum B. Shing,et al.
Implicit time integration for pseudodynamic tests: Convergence and energy dissipation
,
1991
.
[3]
Pui-Shum B. Shing,et al.
Implicit time integration for pseudodynamic tests
,
1991
.
[4]
Thomas J. R. Hughes,et al.
Improved numerical dissipation for time integration algorithms in structural dynamics
,
1977
.
[5]
Ralf Peek,et al.
Error Analysis for Pseudodynamic Test Method. I: Analysis
,
1990
.
[6]
Stephen A. Mahin,et al.
Elimination of spurious higher-mode response in pseudodynamic tests
,
1987
.
[7]
T. Manivannan,et al.
On the accuracy of an implicit algorithm for pseudodynamic tests
,
1990
.