Deconstruction of the Ras switching cycle through saturation mutagenesis

Ras proteins are highly conserved signaling molecules that exhibit regulated, nucleotide-dependent switching between active and inactive states. The high conservation of Ras requires mechanistic explanation, especially given the general mutational tolerance of proteins. Here, we use deep mutational scanning, biochemical analysis and molecular simulations to understand constraints on Ras sequence. Ras exhibits global sensitivity to mutation when regulated by a GTPase activating protein and a nucleotide exchange factor. Removing the regulators shifts the distribution of mutational effects to be largely neutral, and reveals hotspots of activating mutations in residues that restrain Ras dynamics and promote the inactive state. Evolutionary analysis, combined with structural and mutational data, argue that Ras has co-evolved with its regulators in the vertebrate lineage. Overall, our results show that sequence conservation in Ras depends strongly on the biochemical network in which it operates, providing a framework for understanding the origin of global selection pressures on proteins. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.27810.001

[1]  J. Kendrew,et al.  The Species Specificity of Myoglobin , 1954, Nature.

[2]  M. Perutz,et al.  Structure of Hæmoglobin: A Three-Dimensional Fourier Synthesis at 5.5-Å. Resolution, Obtained by X-Ray Analysis , 1960, Nature.

[3]  R F Doolittle,et al.  Protein Evolution , 1968, Nature.

[4]  A. Lesk,et al.  How different amino acid sequences determine similar protein structures: the structure and evolutionary dynamics of the globins. , 1980, Journal of molecular biology.

[5]  M. Wigler,et al.  Cloning and characterization of the high-affinity cAMP phosphodiesterase of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 1986, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[6]  W. Lim,et al.  Alternative packing arrangements in the hydrophobic core of lambda repressor. , 1989, Nature.

[7]  W. Lim,et al.  Alternative packing arrangements in the hydrophobic core of λrepresser , 1989, Nature.

[8]  W. Kabsch,et al.  Refined crystal structure of the triphosphate conformation of H‐ras p21 at 1.35 A resolution: implications for the mechanism of GTP hydrolysis. , 1990, The EMBO journal.

[9]  S H Kim,et al.  Molecular switch for signal transduction: structural differences between active and inactive forms of protooncogenic ras proteins. , 1992, Science.

[10]  Frank McCormick,et al.  The GTPase superfamily: conserved structure and molecular mechanism , 1991, Nature.

[11]  J. Corrie,et al.  Direct, real-time measurement of rapid inorganic phosphate release using a novel fluorescent probe and its application to actomyosin subfragment 1 ATPase. , 1994, Biochemistry.

[12]  X. F. Zhang,et al.  Critical binding and regulatory interactions between Ras and Raf occur through a small, stable N-terminal domain of Raf and specific Ras effector residues , 1994, Molecular and cellular biology.

[13]  A. Wittinghofer,et al.  How Ras-related proteins talk to their effectors. , 1996, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[14]  W. Kabsch,et al.  The Ras-RasGAP complex: structural basis for GTPase activation and its loss in oncogenic Ras mutants. , 1997, Science.

[15]  J. Keith Joung,et al.  Activation of prokaryotic transcription through arbitrary protein–protein contacts , 1997, Nature.

[16]  John Kuriyan,et al.  The structural basis of the activation of Ras by Sos , 1998, Nature.

[17]  Michael W. Mahoney,et al.  A five-site model for liquid water and the reproduction of the density anomaly by rigid, nonpolarizable potential functions , 2000 .

[18]  J. Joung,et al.  A bacterial two-hybrid selection system for studying protein-DNA and protein-protein interactions. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[19]  W. V. van Gunsteren,et al.  A fast SHAKE algorithm to solve distance constraint equations for small molecules in molecular dynamics simulations , 2001 .

[20]  I R Vetter,et al.  Dynamic properties of the Ras switch I region and its importance for binding to effectors , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[21]  I. Vetter,et al.  The Guanine Nucleotide-Binding Switch in Three Dimensions , 2001, Science.

[22]  Markus G. Rudolph,et al.  Thermodynamics of Ras/Effector and Cdc42/Effector Interactions Probed by Isothermal Titration Calorimetry* , 2001, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[23]  J. Kuriyan,et al.  Multiple BCR-ABL kinase domain mutations confer polyclonal resistance to the tyrosine kinase inhibitor imatinib (STI571) in chronic phase and blast crisis chronic myeloid leukemia. , 2002, Cancer cell.

[24]  Andre Hoelz,et al.  Structural Evidence for Feedback Activation by Ras·GTP of the Ras-Specific Nucleotide Exchange Factor SOS , 2003, Cell.

[25]  G. Daley,et al.  Mechanisms of Autoinhibition and STI-571/Imatinib Resistance Revealed by Mutagenesis of BCR-ABL , 2003, Cell.

[26]  Richard Marais,et al.  The RAF proteins take centre stage , 2004, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[27]  Kevin Cowtan,et al.  research papers Acta Crystallographica Section D Biological , 2005 .

[28]  M. Stratton,et al.  The COSMIC (Catalogue of Somatic Mutations in Cancer) database and website , 2004, British Journal of Cancer.

[29]  Holger Sondermann,et al.  Structural Analysis of Autoinhibition in the Ras Activator Son of Sevenless , 2004, Cell.

[30]  Christina Kiel,et al.  Recognizing and defining true Ras binding domains I: biochemical analysis. , 2005, Journal of molecular biology.

[31]  S. Vishveshwara,et al.  A network representation of protein structures: implications for protein stability. , 2005, Biophysical journal.

[32]  Dan S. Tawfik,et al.  Robustness–epistasis link shapes the fitness landscape of a randomly drifting protein , 2006, Nature.

[33]  P. Evans,et al.  Scaling and assessment of data quality. , 2006, Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography.

[34]  Airlie J. McCoy,et al.  Solving structures of protein complexes by molecular replacement with Phaser , 2006, Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography.

[35]  S. Vishveshwara,et al.  A study of communication pathways in methionyl- tRNA synthetase by molecular dynamics simulations and structure network analysis , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[36]  J Andrew McCammon,et al.  Mapping the nucleotide and isoform-dependent structural and dynamical features of Ras proteins. , 2008, Structure.

[37]  O. Gascuel,et al.  An improved general amino acid replacement matrix. , 2008, Molecular biology and evolution.

[38]  Nancy F. Hansen,et al.  Accurate Whole Human Genome Sequencing using Reversible Terminator Chemistry , 2008, Nature.

[39]  J Andrew McCammon,et al.  A novel switch region regulates H‐ras membrane orientation and signal output , 2008, The EMBO journal.

[40]  Jodi Gureasko,et al.  Erratum: Membrane-dependent signal integration by the Ras activator Son of sevenless , 2008, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[41]  James Andrew McCammon,et al.  Ras Conformational Switching: Simulating Nucleotide-Dependent Conformational Transitions with Accelerated Molecular Dynamics , 2009, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[42]  Amy Young,et al.  Ras signaling and therapies. , 2009, Advances in cancer research.

[43]  Jayajit Das,et al.  Digital Signaling and Hysteresis Characterize Ras Activation in Lymphoid Cells , 2009, Cell.

[44]  J. Rabinowitz,et al.  Absolute Metabolite Concentrations and Implied Enzyme Active Site Occupancy in Escherichia coli , 2009, Nature chemical biology.

[45]  B. Golinelli‐Pimpaneau,et al.  Pseudo-merohedral twinning in monoclinic crystals of wild-type human brain neuroglobin. , 2009, Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography.

[46]  M. Ahmadian,et al.  In vitro GEF and GAP assays. , 2009, Current protocols in cell biology.

[47]  H. Kalbitzer,et al.  Improved Binding of Raf to Ras·GDP Is Correlated with Biological Activity* , 2009, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[48]  J. Melo,et al.  Selecting optimal second-line tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy for chronic myeloid leukemia patients after imatinib failure: does the BCR-ABL mutation status really matter? , 2009, Blood.

[49]  Barry S Taylor,et al.  Genomic and biological characterization of exon 4 KRAS mutations in human cancer. , 2010, Cancer research.

[50]  W. Kabsch XDS , 2010, Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography.

[51]  R. Dror,et al.  Improved side-chain torsion potentials for the Amber ff99SB protein force field , 2010, Proteins.

[52]  Dan S. Tawfik,et al.  Mutational effects and the evolution of new protein functions , 2010, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[53]  Randy J. Read,et al.  Acta Crystallographica Section D Biological , 2003 .

[54]  C. Mattos,et al.  Allosteric modulation of Ras positions Q61 for a direct role in catalysis , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[55]  N. Pannu,et al.  REFMAC5 for the refinement of macromolecular crystal structures , 2011, Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography.

[56]  Randy J. Read,et al.  Overview of the CCP4 suite and current developments , 2011, Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography.

[57]  C. Mattos,et al.  Shift in the equilibrium between on and off states of the allosteric switch in Ras-GppNHp affected by small molecules and bulk solvent composition. , 2012, Biochemistry.

[58]  F. J. Poelwijk,et al.  The spatial architecture of protein function and adaptation , 2012, Nature.

[59]  Adi Doron-Faigenboim,et al.  FastML: a web server for probabilistic reconstruction of ancestral sequences , 2012, Nucleic Acids Res..

[60]  Carla Mattos,et al.  A comprehensive survey of Ras mutations in cancer. , 2012, Cancer research.

[61]  B. Haas,et al.  Premetazoan genome evolution and the regulation of cell differentiation in the choanoflagellate Salpingoeca rosetta , 2013, Genome Biology.

[62]  Alfonso Valencia,et al.  The Ras protein superfamily: Evolutionary tree and role of conserved amino acids , 2012, Journal of Cell Biology.

[63]  E. L. Kovrigin,et al.  Characterization of the second ion-binding site in the G domain of H-Ras. , 2012, Biochemistry.

[64]  H. Dohlman,et al.  Differences in the Regulation of K-Ras and H-Ras Isoforms by Monoubiquitination* , 2013, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[65]  Saraswathi Vishveshwara,et al.  An automated approach to network features of protein structure ensembles , 2013, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[66]  H. Dohlman,et al.  Differences in the Regulation of KRas and HRas Isoforms by Monoubiquitination * , 2013 .

[67]  D. Richter,et al.  The genomic and cellular foundations of animal origins. , 2013, Annual review of genetics.

[68]  J. Kuriyan,et al.  Structural analysis of autoinhibition in the Ras-specific exchange factor RasGRP1 , 2013, eLife.

[69]  Kelly M. Thayer,et al.  Analyses of the effects of all ubiquitin point mutants on yeast growth rate. , 2013, Journal of molecular biology.

[70]  Piotr Sliz,et al.  Collaboration gets the most out of software , 2013, eLife.

[71]  Mitsuhiko Ikura,et al.  Integrated RAS signaling defined by parallel NMR detection of effectors and regulators. , 2014, Nature chemical biology.

[72]  S. Fields,et al.  Deep mutational scanning: a new style of protein science , 2014, Nature Methods.

[73]  R. Varadarajan,et al.  Residue specific contributions to stability and activity inferred from saturation mutagenesis and deep sequencing. , 2014, Current opinion in structural biology.

[74]  Benjamin P. Roscoe,et al.  Viewing Protein Fitness Landscapes Through a Next-Gen Lens , 2014, Genetics.

[75]  Alexandros Stamatakis,et al.  RAxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies , 2014, Bioinform..

[76]  Ameya A. Mashruwala,et al.  A universal cloning method based on yeast homologous recombination that is simple, efficient, and versatile. , 2014, Journal of Microbiological Methods.

[77]  Andrey A Lebedev,et al.  Space-group and origin ambiguity in macromolecular structures with pseudo-symmetry and its treatment with the program Zanuda. , 2014, Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography.

[78]  Jay T. Groves,et al.  Ras activation by SOS: Allosteric regulation by altered fluctuation dynamics , 2014, Science.

[79]  R. Nussinov,et al.  Allosteric effects of the oncogenic RasQ61L mutant on Raf-RBD. , 2015, Structure.

[80]  Ozlem Keskin,et al.  GTP-dependent K-Ras dimerization , 2015 .

[81]  Mitsuhiko Ikura,et al.  Oncogenic and RASopathy-associated K-RAS mutations relieve membrane-dependent occlusion of the effector-binding site , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[82]  T. Graeber,et al.  Tyrosine phosphorylation of RAS by ABL allosterically enhances effector binding , 2015, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[83]  R. Nussinov,et al.  'Latent drivers' expand the cancer mutational landscape. , 2015, Current opinion in structural biology.

[84]  Michael T. Laub,et al.  Pervasive degeneracy and epistasis in a protein-protein interface , 2015, Science.

[85]  Tandy J. Warnow,et al.  PASTA: Ultra-Large Multiple Sequence Alignment for Nucleotide and Amino-Acid Sequences , 2015, J. Comput. Biol..

[86]  R. Ranganathan,et al.  Evolvability as a Function of Purifying Selection in TEM-1 b-Lactamase Graphical Abstract Highlights , 2015 .

[87]  Robert D. Finn,et al.  The Pfam protein families database: towards a more sustainable future , 2015, Nucleic Acids Res..

[88]  R. Ranganathan,et al.  Origins of Allostery and Evolvability in Proteins: A Case Study , 2016, Cell.

[89]  Frank McCormick,et al.  K-Ras protein as a drug target , 2016, Journal of Molecular Medicine.

[90]  Saraswathi Vishveshwara,et al.  Protein Structure and Function: Looking through the Network of Side-Chain Interactions. , 2015, Current protein & peptide science.

[91]  C. Der,et al.  RAS isoforms and mutations in cancer at a glance , 2016, Journal of Cell Science.

[92]  Ruth Nussinov,et al.  The Structural Basis of Oncogenic Mutations G12, G13 and Q61 in Small GTPase K-Ras4B , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[93]  Carla Mattos,et al.  The small GTPases K-Ras, N-Ras, and H-Ras have distinct biochemical properties determined by allosteric effects , 2017, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.