Investigation of viewing and answering approaches of questionnaire in detecting abnormalities in intra-oral dental radiographs

One of medical images problems are low image quality due to various factors such as acquisition process, radiographer skill, low contrast images and viewing condition. Thus the implementation of contrast enhancement algorithms (CEAs) to visually improve the image quality is an acceptable practice in diagnosing medical images. Since medical image diagnosis involves various diseases, the improvement of image quality become complex and the involvement of medical experts in evaluating the images become vital. However, to get a medical officer to participate in image quality evaluation for research purposes is challenging. One of the factors is their busy work scheduling. Thus this work conducts experiments to investigate the most effective approach relating to questionnaire answering and viewing approaches by dentists in evaluating the images. Medical images used are original and enhanced of intra-oral dental radiographs. The investigation is on the effect of how questionnaire answering and viewing condition approach give effect on dentists’ evaluation in term of detecting the abnormalities. The parameters of investigation are; supervised twin-view approach, unsupervised random approach and supervised random approach. The supervised approach is where the dentist answers the questionnaire with an assistant at the predefined time of two hours. The unsupervised approach is when the dentist answer the questionnaire at his/her own predefined time in three month duration. The viewing condition approach compare between twin-view versus random approach. Twin view method is about the arrangement of the images side by side between original and enhanced images. Random approach is where the images are arranged randomly. Results show that random approach of supervised method able to champion the investigation. © 2014 The Authors. Published by Global Illuminators Publishing. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) Peer-review under responsibility of the Scientific & Review committee of ICMRP-2014.

[1]  K. Kamburoğlu,et al.  Interpretation of chemically created periapical lesions using 2 different dental cone-beam computerized tomography units, an intraoral digital sensor, and conventional film. , 2009, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics.

[2]  E Alpöz,et al.  Perception of anatomical structures in digitally filtered and conventional panoramic radiographs: a clinical evaluation. , 2010, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[3]  M. N. Taib,et al.  The effect of sharp contrast-limited adaptive histogram equalization (SCLAHE) on Intra-oral dental radiograph images , 2010, 2010 IEEE EMBS Conference on Biomedical Engineering and Sciences (IECBES).

[4]  K. Patil,et al.  A Subjective Assessment of Perceived Clarity of Indirect Digital Images and Processed Digital Images with Conventional Intra-oral Periapical Radiographs. , 2013, Journal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR.

[5]  Durr-e- Sabih,et al.  Image perception and interpretation of abnormalities; can we believe our eyes? Can we do something about it? , 2010, Insights into imaging.

[6]  Julio Cezar de Melo Castilho,et al.  INFLUENCE OF IMAGE FILTERS ON THE REPRODUCIBILITY OF MEASUREMENTS OF ALVEOLAR BONE LOSS , 2006, Journal of applied oral science : revista FOB.

[7]  Siti Arpah Ahmad,et al.  ANALYSIS OF COMPOUND ENHANCEMENT ALGORITHMS(CEA) BASED ON ADAPTIVE HISTOGRAM EQUALIZATION (AHE) ON INTRA-ORAL DENTAL RADIOGRAPHS IMAGES , 2011 .

[8]  A. Bovik,et al.  A universal image quality index , 2002, IEEE Signal Processing Letters.

[9]  M. Akbari,et al.  Comparing the Performance of Image Enhancement Methods to Detect Microcalcification Clusters in Digital Mammography , 2012, Iranian journal of cancer prevention.

[10]  T Sund,et al.  Sliding window adaptive histogram equalization of intraoral radiographs: effect on image quality. , 2006, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[11]  Sanjay S. Gharde,et al.  REVIEW OF VARIOUS IMAGE CONTRAST ENHANCEMENTTECHNIQUES , 2013 .

[12]  R. Willers,et al.  Subjective image quality of digitally filtered radiographs acquired by the Dürr Vistascan system compared with conventional radiographs. , 2006, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics.

[13]  Mojdeh Mehdizadeh,et al.  Study of effect of Adaptive Histogram Equalization on image quality in digital preapical image in pre apex area. , 2009 .

[14]  E A Krupinski,et al.  Perception research in medical imaging. , 2005, The British journal of radiology.

[15]  I. Tsalafoutas,et al.  Exploring the useful exposure range limits of three intraoral image receptors for various tube potential, tube current and exposure time settings , 2011 .

[16]  W. Han,et al.  Image enhancement of digital periapical radiographs according to diagnostic tasks , 2014, Imaging science in dentistry.