Computer-aided volumetry of pulmonary nodules exhibiting ground-glass opacity at MDCT.

OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to investigate the accuracy and reproducibility of results acquired with computer-aided volumetry software during MDCT of pulmonary nodules exhibiting ground-glass opacity. MATERIALS AND METHODS To evaluate the accuracy of computer-aided volumetry software, we performed thin-section helical CT of a chest phantom that included simulated 3-, 5-, 8-, 10-, and 12-mm-diameter ground-glass opacity nodules with attenuation of -800, -630, and -450 HU. Three radiologists measured the volume of the nodules and calculated the relative volume measurement error, which was defined as follows: (measured nodule volume minus assumed nodule volume / assumed nodule volume) x 100. Two radiologists performed two independent measurements of 59 nodules in humans. Intraobserver and interobserver agreement was evaluated with Bland-Altman methods. RESULTS The relative volume measurement error for simulated ground-glass opacity nodules measuring 3 mm ranged from 51.1% to 85.2% and for nodules measuring 5 mm or more in diameter ranged from -4.1% to 7.1%. In the clinical study, for intraobserver agreement, the 95% limits of agreement were -14.9% and -13.7% and -16.6% to 15.7% for observers A and B. For interobserver agreement, these values were -16.3% to 23.7% for nodules 8 mm in diameter or larger. CONCLUSION With computer-aided volumetry of ground-glass opacity nodules, the relative volume measurement error was small for nodules 5 mm in diameter or larger. Intraobserver and interobserver agreement was relatively high for nodules 8 mm in diameter or larger.

[1]  K. Yasumoto,et al.  Peripheral lung adenocarcinoma: correlation of thin-section CT findings with histologic prognostic factors and survival. , 2001, Radiology.

[2]  Mathias Prokop,et al.  Pulmonary nodules: Interscan variability of semiautomated volume measurements with multisection CT-- influence of inspiration level, nodule size, and segmentation performance. , 2007, Radiology.

[3]  Y. Yamashita,et al.  Volume-doubling time of pulmonary nodules with ground glass opacity at multidetector CT: Assessment with computer-aided three-dimensional volumetry. , 2011, Academic radiology.

[4]  名郷 直樹,et al.  加齢,閉経による骨量の変化について--Digital Image Processing Methodによる検討 , 1993 .

[5]  Takeshi Nakaura,et al.  Pulmonary nodules: estimation of malignancy at thin-section helical CT--effect of computer-aided diagnosis on performance of radiologists. , 2006, Radiology.

[6]  J. Goo,et al.  Focal interstitial fibrosis manifesting as nodular ground-glass opacity: thin-section CT findings , 2007, European Radiology.

[7]  Mordecai Schwartz.  A biomathematical approach to clinical tumor growth , 1961, Cancer.

[8]  Y. Yamashita,et al.  Differential diagnosis of ground-glass opacity nodules: CT number analysis by three-dimensional computerized quantification. , 2007, Chest.

[9]  Kyle J. Myers,et al.  Information-Theoretic Approach for Analyzing Bias and Variance in Lung Nodule Size Estimation With CT: A Phantom Study , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[10]  Masahiro Tsuboi,et al.  International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer/American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society International Multidisciplinary Classification of Lung Adenocarcinoma , 2011, Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer.

[11]  Simina C. Fluture,et al.  Small pulmonary nodules: reproducibility of three-dimensional volumetric measurement and estimation of time to follow-up CT. , 2004, Radiology.

[12]  M. L. R. D. Christenson,et al.  Inherent Variability of CT Lung Nodule Measurements In Vivo Using Semiautomated Volumetric Measurements , 2007 .

[13]  B. Ginneken,et al.  A comparison of six software packages for evaluation of solid lung nodules using semi-automated volumetry: What is the minimum increase in size to detect growth in repeated CT examinations , 2009, European Radiology.

[14]  Jin Mo Goo,et al.  Ground-glass nodules on chest CT as imaging biomarkers in the management of lung adenocarcinoma. , 2011, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[15]  Hironobu Ohmatsu,et al.  Progression of Focal Pure Ground-Glass Opacity Detected by Low-Dose Helical Computed Tomography Screening for Lung Cancer , 2004, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[16]  F. Detterbeck,et al.  Approach to the ground-glass nodule. , 2011, Clinics in chest medicine.

[17]  Sanjiv J. Shah,et al.  Autologous non-myeloablative haemopoietic stem-cell transplantation compared with pulse cyclophosphamide once per month for systemic sclerosis (ASSIST): an open-label, randomised phase 2 trial , 2011, The Lancet.

[18]  S Sone,et al.  Growth rate of small lung cancers detected on mass CT screening. , 2000, The British journal of radiology.

[19]  Kenji Eguchi,et al.  Focal ground-glass opacity detected by low-dose helical CT. , 2002, Chest.

[20]  K Kuriyama,et al.  Ground-glass opacity on thin-section CT: value in differentiating subtypes of adenocarcinoma of the lung. , 1999, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[21]  J M Bland,et al.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement , 1986 .

[22]  J. Goo,et al.  Volumetric measurement of synthetic lung nodules with multi-detector row CT: effect of various image reconstruction parameters and segmentation thresholds on measurement accuracy. , 2005, Radiology.

[23]  O. Miettinen,et al.  CT screening for lung cancer: frequency and significance of part-solid and nonsolid nodules. , 2002, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[24]  S. Armato,et al.  Lung cancers missed at low-dose helical CT screening in a general population: comparison of clinical, histopathologic, and imaging findings. , 2002, Radiology.

[25]  Anthony P. Reeves,et al.  Three-dimensional segmentation and growth-rate estimation of small pulmonary nodules in helical CT images , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[26]  H Nakata,et al.  Evolution of peripheral lung adenocarcinomas: CT findings correlated with histology and tumor doubling time. , 2000, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[27]  Marcos Salganicoff,et al.  Automated Volumetry of Solid Pulmonary Nodules in a Phantom: Accuracy Across Different CT Scanner Technologies , 2007, Investigative radiology.

[28]  W. Heindel,et al.  Volumetric measurements of pulmonary nodules at multi-row detector CT: in vivo reproducibility , 2003, European Radiology.

[29]  Binsheng Zhao,et al.  Small pulmonary nodules: volumetrically determined growth rates based on CT evaluation. , 2000, Radiology.

[30]  K. Marten,et al.  Inadequacy of manual measurements compared to automated CT volumetry in assessment of treatment response of pulmonary metastases using RECIST criteria , 2006, European Radiology.

[31]  Y. Shim,et al.  Persistent pulmonary nodular ground-glass opacity at thin-section CT: histopathologic comparisons. , 2007, Radiology.

[32]  Margrit Betke,et al.  Small pulmonary nodules: volume measurement at chest CT--phantom study. , 2003, Radiology.

[33]  Setsuo Hirohashi,et al.  Small adenocarcinoma of the lung. Histologic characteristics and prognosis , 1995 .

[34]  A. Aisen,et al.  Effect of varying CT section width on volumetric measurement of lung tumors and application of compensatory equations. , 2003, Radiology.

[35]  Ryutaro Kakinuma,et al.  Localized Pure Ground-Glass Opacity on High-Resolution CT: Histologic Characteristics , 2002, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[36]  J. Goo.  A Computer-Aided Diagnosis for Evaluating Lung Nodules on Chest CT: the Current Status and Perspective , 2011, Korean journal of radiology.

[37]  Marcos Salganicoff,et al.  Accuracy of automated volumetry of pulmonary nodules across different multislice CT scanners , 2007, European Radiology.