Geostatistical Simulation of Regionalized Pore-Size Distributions Using Min/Max Autocorrelation Factors

In many fields of the Earth Sciences, one is interested in the distribution of particle or void sizes within samples. Like many other geological attributes, size distributions exhibit spatial variability, and it is convenient to view them within a geostatistical framework, as regionalized functions or curves. Since they rarely conform to simple parametric models, size distributions are best characterized using their raw spectrum as determined experimentally in the form of a series of abundance measures corresponding to a series of discrete size classes. However, the number of classes may be large and the class abundances may be highly cross-correlated. In order to model the spatial variations of discretized size distributions using current geostatistical simulation methods, it is necessary to reduce the number of variables considered and to render them uncorrelated among one another. This is achieved using a principal components-based approach known as Min/Max Autocorrelation Factors (MAF). For a two-structure linear model of coregionalization, the approach has the attractive feature of producing orthogonal factors ranked in order of increasing spatial correlation. Factors consisting largely of noise and exhibiting pure nugget–effect correlation structures are isolated in the lower rankings, and these need not be simulated. The factors to be simulated are those capturing most of the spatial correlation in the data, and they are isolated in the highest rankings. Following a review of MAF theory, the approach is applied to the modeling of pore-size distributions in partially welded tuff. Results of the case study confirm the usefulness of the MAF approach for the simulation of large numbers of coregionalized variables.

[1]  W. C. Krumbein,et al.  Size frequency distributions of sediments , 1934 .

[2]  J. E. Klovan The Use of Factor Analysis in Determining Depositional Environments from Grain-Size Distributions , 1966 .

[3]  H. Bader,et al.  The hyperbolic distribution of particle sizes , 1970 .

[4]  P. Mather Study of factors influencing variation in size characteristics of fluvioglacial sediments , 1972 .

[5]  R. Reyment,et al.  Statistics and Data Analysis in Geology. , 1988 .

[6]  N. Wardlaw,et al.  Mercury Capillary Pressure Curves and the Intepretation of Pore Structure and Capillary Behaviour in Reservoir Rocks , 1976 .

[7]  F. N. David,et al.  Geological Factor Analysis , 1976 .

[8]  L. E. Borgman,et al.  A Case Study: Multivariate Properties of Bentonite in Northeastern Wyoming , 1976 .

[9]  C. Banfield Geological Factor Analysis (Methods in Geomathematics 1) , 1977 .

[10]  O. Barndorff-Nielsen,et al.  The pattern of natural size distributions , 1980 .

[11]  William A. Pirkle,et al.  The Yulee heavy mineral sand deposits of northeastern Florida , 1984 .

[12]  F. Agterberg,et al.  Statistical analysis of granite pore size distribution data, Lac du Bonnet batholith, eastern Manitoba , 1984 .

[13]  A. A. Manieh Oolite liberation of oolitic iron ore, Wadi Fatima, Saudi Arabia , 1984 .

[14]  W. Full,et al.  Optimal Configuration and Information Content of Sets of Frequency Distributions , 1984 .

[15]  W. Yim Liberation studies on tin-bearing sands off north Cornwall, U.K. , 1984 .

[16]  P. Switzer,et al.  A transformation for ordering multispectral data in terms of image quality with implications for noise removal , 1988 .

[17]  F. Agterberg,et al.  Spatial and multivariate analysis of geochemical data from metavolcanic rocks in the Ben Nevis area, Ontario , 1988 .

[18]  Pierre Petitgas,et al.  Overview of Methods for Coregionalization Analysis , 1989 .

[19]  P. Chavez,et al.  Extracting spectral contrast in landsat thematic mapper image data using selective principal component analysis , 1989 .

[20]  D. Evans,et al.  Unsaturated fractured rock characterization methods and data sets at the Apache Leap Tuff Site , 1990 .

[21]  A. G. Journel,et al.  Indicator principal component kriging , 1991 .

[22]  R. Dwivedi,et al.  Principal component analysis of LANDSAT MSS data for delineation of terrain features , 1992 .

[23]  Clayton V. Deutsch,et al.  GSLIB: Geostatistical Software Library and User's Guide , 1993 .

[24]  Sampling of Orebodies with a Highly Dispersed Mineralization , 1993 .

[25]  P. Goovaerts Spatial orthogonality of the principal components computed from coregionalized variables , 1993 .

[26]  M. Voltz,et al.  Geostatistical Interpolation of Curves: A Case Study in Soil Science , 1993 .

[27]  Todd C. Rasmussen,et al.  PERMEABILITY OF APACHE LEAP TUFF : BOREHOLE AND CORE MEASUREMENTS USING WATER AND AIR , 1993 .

[28]  Zekâi Şen,et al.  Determination of Hydraulic Conductivity from Complete Grain‐Size Distribution Curves , 1993 .

[29]  A. Desbarats,et al.  Upscaling Capillary Pressure‐Saturation Curves in Heterogeneous Porous Media , 1995 .

[30]  J. J. Attard,et al.  Pore-size data in petrophysics: a perspective on the measurement of pore geometry , 1997, Geological Society, London, Special Publications.

[31]  E. Perfect,et al.  Fractal models for the fragmentation of rocks and soils: a review , 1997 .

[32]  A. Tercan Importance of Orthogonalization Algorithm in Modeling Conditional Distributions by Orthogonal Transformed Indicator Methods , 1999 .