Computer Algebra Challenges in Nanotechnology: Accurate Modeling of Nanoscale Electro-optic Devices Using Finite Elements Method

The simulation of silicon-based light-emitting and photodetectors nanodevices using computer algebra became a challenge. These devices couple the hyperbolic equations of electromagnetic radiation, the parabolic equations of heat conduction, the elliptic equations describing electric potential, and the eigenvalue equations of quantum mechanics—with the nonlinear drift–diffusion equations of the semiconductor physics. These complex equations must be solved by using generally mixed Dirichlet–Neumann boundary conditions in three-dimensional geometries. Comsol Multiphysics modeling software is employed integrated with MATLAB–SIMULINK and Zemax. The physical equations are discretized on a mesh using the Galerkin finite element method (FEM) and to a lesser extent the method of finite volumes. The equations can be implemented in a variety of forms such as directly as a partial differential equation, or as a variational integral, the so-called weak form. Boundary conditions may also be imposed directly or using variational constraint and reaction forces. Both choices have implication for convergence and physicality of the solution. The mesh is assembled from triangular or quadrilateral elements in two-dimensions, and hexahedral or prismatic elements in three dimensions, using a variety of algorithms. Solution is achieved using direct or iterative linear solvers and nonlinear solvers. The former are based on conjugate gradients, the latter generally on Newton–Raphson iterations. The general framework of FEM discretization, meshing and solver algorithms will be presented together with techniques for dealing with challenges such as multiple time scales, shocks and nonconvergence; these include load ramping, segregated iterations, and adaptive meshing.

[1]  Avraham Chelly,et al.  Usage and Limitation of Standard Mobility Models for TCAD Simulation of Nanoscaled FD-SOI MOSFETs , 2015 .

[2]  Avraham Chelly,et al.  Electro-optical study of nanoscale Al-Si-truncated conical photodetector with subwavelength aperture , 2017 .

[3]  Avraham Chelly,et al.  Comparative study of NSB and UTB SOI MOSFETs characteristics by extraction of series resistance , 2014 .

[4]  R. Courant Variational methods for the solution of problems of equilibrium and vibrations , 1943 .

[5]  Avraham Chelly,et al.  Electrical control simulation of near infrared emission in SOI-MOSFET quantum well devices , 2017 .

[6]  Neha Gupta,et al.  TCAD RF performance investigation of Transparent Gate Recessed Channel MOSFET , 2016, Microelectron. J..

[7]  Motoichi Ohtsu Progress in Nano-Electro-Optics V: Nanophotonic Fabrications, Devices, Systems, and Their Theoretical Bases (Springer Series in Optical Sciences) , 2006 .

[8]  Wan Ishak Wan Ismail,et al.  Implementation of Galerkin's Method and Modal Analysis for Unforced Vibration Response of a Tractor Suspension Model , 2014 .

[9]  Anomalous Kink Effect in Low-Dimensional Gate-Recessed Fully Depleted SOI MOSFET at Low Temperature , 2015 .

[10]  Matityahu Karelits,et al.  Nanoscale silicon truncated conical photodetector at subwavelength aperture for NSOM applications , 2017, 2017 International Conference on Optical MEMS and Nanophotonics (OMN).

[11]  Zeev Zalevsky,et al.  Study of the Photo- and Thermoactivation Mechanisms in Nanoscale SOI Modulator , 2017, J. Sensors.

[12]  Yaakov Mandelbaum,et al.  Probing of quantum energy levels in nanoscale body SOI-MOSFET: Experimental and simulation results , 2018, Journal of Applied Physics.

[13]  Avraham Chelly,et al.  Modeling and simulations of MOSQWell transistor future building block for optical communication , 2016, 2016 IEEE International Conference on the Science of Electrical Engineering (ICSEE).

[14]  N. Nikolov,et al.  Thermo-Stimulation of Charges by Peltier Element for Trap Analysis in Polymer Layers , 2011 .

[15]  G. Strang,et al.  An Analysis of the Finite Element Method , 1974 .