TMT Labeling for the Masses: A Robust and Cost-efficient, In-solution Labeling Approach*

Isobaric labeling using tandem mass tags (TMTs) is increasingly applied for deep-scale proteomic studies in a multitude of organisms and addressing diverse research questions. The cost of labeling reagents represents a substantial proportion of the total expenses for conducting such experiments. Here, Zecha et al. present an economically optimized TMT labeling approach that reduces the quantity of required labeling reagent by a factor of eight and reproducibly achieves complete labeling. Graphical Abstract Highlights TMT labeling protocol with excellent intra- and interlaboratory reproducibility. Complete in-solution labeling of peptides using 1/8 of recommended TMT quantities. Demonstration of utility for deep-scale (phospho)proteome analysis. Isobaric stable isotope labeling using, for example, tandem mass tags (TMTs) is increasingly being applied for large-scale proteomic studies. Experiments focusing on proteoform analysis in drug time course or perturbation studies or in large patient cohorts greatly benefit from the reproducible quantification of single peptides across samples. However, such studies often require labeling of hundreds of micrograms of peptides such that the cost for labeling reagents represents a major contribution to the overall cost of an experiment. Here, we describe and evaluate a robust and cost-effective protocol for TMT labeling that reduces the quantity of required labeling reagent by a factor of eight and achieves complete labeling. Under- and overlabeling of peptides derived from complex digests of tissues and cell lines were systematically evaluated using peptide quantities of between 12.5 and 800 μg and TMT-to-peptide ratios (wt/wt) ranging from 8:1 to 1:2 at different TMT and peptide concentrations. When reaction volumes were reduced to maintain TMT and peptide concentrations of at least 10 mm and 2 g/l, respectively, TMT-to-peptide ratios as low as 1:1 (wt/wt) resulted in labeling efficiencies of > 99% and excellent intra- and interlaboratory reproducibility. The utility of the optimized protocol was further demonstrated in a deep-scale proteome and phosphoproteome analysis of patient-derived xenograft tumor tissue benchmarked against the labeling procedure recommended by the TMT vendor. Finally, we discuss the impact of labeling reaction parameters for N-hydroxysuccinimide ester-based chemistry and provide guidance on adopting efficient labeling protocols for different peptide quantities.

[1]  Colin J. Daniel,et al.  Proteomics, Post-translational Modifications, and Integrative Analyses Reveal Molecular Heterogeneity within Medulloblastoma Subgroups. , 2018, Cancer cell.

[2]  Ronald J. Moore,et al.  Reproducible workflow for multiplexed deep-scale proteome and phosphoproteome analysis of tumor tissues by liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry , 2018, Nature Protocols.

[3]  Steven P Gygi,et al.  Streamlined Tandem Mass Tag (SL-TMT) Protocol: An Efficient Strategy for Quantitative (Phospho)proteome Profiling Using Tandem Mass Tag-Synchronous Precursor Selection-MS3. , 2018, Journal of proteome research.

[4]  S. Gygi,et al.  Filter-Based Protein Digestion (FPD): A Detergent-Free and Scaffold-Based Strategy for TMT Workflows. , 2018, Journal of proteome research.

[5]  B. Kuster,et al.  Peptide Level Turnover Measurements Enable the Study of Proteoform Dynamics * , 2018, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[6]  S. Gygi,et al.  Age-related neurodegenerative disease associated pathways identified in retinal and vitreous proteome from human glaucoma eyes , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[7]  Li Ding,et al.  Proteogenomic integration reveals therapeutic targets in breast cancer xenografts , 2017, Nature Communications.

[8]  Heiner Koch,et al.  Phosphoproteome Profiling Reveals Molecular Mechanisms of Growth-Factor-Mediated Kinase Inhibitor Resistance in EGFR-Overexpressing Cancer Cells. , 2016, Journal of proteome research.

[9]  L. McDonnell,et al.  Set of Novel Automated Quantitative Microproteomics Protocols for Small Sample Amounts and Its Application to Kidney Tissue Substructures. , 2016, Journal of proteome research.

[10]  Jüergen Cox,et al.  The MaxQuant computational platform for mass spectrometry-based shotgun proteomics , 2016, Nature Protocols.

[11]  Steven P Gygi,et al.  Quantitative mass spectrometry-based multiplexing compares the abundance of 5000 S. cerevisiae proteins across 10 carbon sources. , 2016, Journal of proteomics.

[12]  K. Kuhn,et al.  Low-pH Solid-Phase Amino Labeling of Complex Peptide Digests with TMTs Improves Peptide Identification Rates for Multiplexed Global Phosphopeptide Analysis. , 2015, Journal of proteome research.

[13]  Li Ding,et al.  Endocrine-therapy-resistant ESR1 variants revealed by genomic characterization of breast-cancer-derived xenografts. , 2013, Cell reports.

[14]  Bernhard Kuster,et al.  Quantitative mass spectrometry in proteomics: critical review update from 2007 to the present , 2012, Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry.

[15]  John E Wiktorowicz,et al.  Model studies on iTRAQ modification of peptides: sequence-dependent reaction specificity. , 2012, Journal of proteome research.

[16]  M. Mann,et al.  Andromeda: a peptide search engine integrated into the MaxQuant environment. , 2011, Journal of proteome research.

[17]  R. Zenobi,et al.  Chemical cross-linking with NHS esters: a systematic study on amino acid reactivities. , 2009, Journal of mass spectrometry : JMS.

[18]  J. V. Staros,et al.  Reactions of N-hydroxysulfosuccinimide active esters. , 2009, International journal of peptide and protein research.

[19]  C. Pace,et al.  A summary of the measured pK values of the ionizable groups in folded proteins , 2008, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[20]  F. Regnier,et al.  Primary amine coding as a path to comparative proteomics , 2006, Proteomics.

[21]  F. Regnier,et al.  Enhancement of amino acid detection and quantification by electrospray ionization mass spectrometry. , 2006, Analytical chemistry.

[22]  G. Kruppa,et al.  Strategy for selective chemical cross-linking of tyrosine and lysine residues , 2004, Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry.

[23]  Andrew H. Thompson,et al.  Tandem mass tags: a novel quantification strategy for comparative analysis of complex protein mixtures by MS/MS. , 2003, Analytical chemistry.

[24]  A. Kurosky,et al.  Elevated intrinsic reactivity of seryl hydroxyl groups within the linear peptide triads His-Xaa-Ser or Ser-Xaa-His. , 1993, Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications - BBRC.

[25]  A. Kurosky,et al.  The occurrence of O-acylation during biotinylation of gonadotropin-releasing hormone and analogs. Evidence for a reactive serine. , 1992, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[26]  B. Kuster,et al.  High pH Reversed-Phase Micro-Columns for Simple, Sensitive, and Efficient Fractionation of Proteome and (TMT labeled) Phosphoproteome Digests. , 2017, Methods in molecular biology.

[27]  W. Haas,et al.  Multiplexed Quantitative Proteomics for High-Throughput Comprehensive Proteome Comparisons of Human Cell Lines. , 2016, Methods in molecular biology.

[28]  N. W. Downer,et al.  Hydrogen exchange. , 1972, Annual review of biochemistry.