Accuracy and precision: A new view on kinematic assessment of solid-state hinges and compliant mechanisms

Compliant mechanisms are alternatives to conventional mechanisms which exploit elastic strain to produce desired deformations instead of using moveable parts. They are designed for a kinematic task (providing desired deformations) but do not possess a kinematics in the strict sense. This leads to difficulties while assessing the quality of a compliant mechanism’s design. The kinematics of a compliant mechanism can be seen as a fuzzy property. There is no unique kinematics, since every deformation need a particular force system to act; however, certain deformations are easier to obtain than others. A parallel can be made with measurement theory: the measured value of a quantity is not unique, but exists as statistic distribution of measures. A representative measure of this distribution can be chosen to evaluate how far the measures divert from a reference value. Based on this analogy, the concept of accuracy and precision of compliant systems are introduced and discussed in this paper. A quantitative determination of these qualities based on the eigenvalue analysis of the hinge’s stiffness is proposed. This new approach is capable of removing most of the ambiguities included in the state-of-the-art assessment criteria (usually based on the concepts of path deviation and parasitic motion).

[1]  Alexander Hasse Topology Optimization of Compliant Mechanisms Explicitly Considering Desired Kinematics and Stiffness Constraints , 2016 .

[2]  Nicolae Lobontiu,et al.  Design of Circular Cross-Section Corner-Filleted Flexure Hinges for Three-Dimensional Compliant Mechanisms , 2002 .

[3]  Wei Xu,et al.  Flexure hinges for piezoactuator displacement amplifiers: flexibility, accuracy, and stress considerations , 1996 .

[4]  Saša Zelenika,et al.  Optimized cross-spring pivot configurations with minimized parasitic shifts and stiffness variations investigated via nonlinear FEA , 2017 .

[5]  Alexander Hasse,et al.  Design of compliant mechanisms with selective compliance , 2009 .

[6]  Nicolae Lobontiu,et al.  Corner-Filleted Flexure Hinges , 2001 .

[7]  L. F. Campanile,et al.  Synthesis of flexible mechanisms for airfoil shape control: a modal procedure , 2004 .

[8]  Vincenzo Parenti-Castelli,et al.  Comparative evaluation of straight and curved beam flexures for selectively compliant mechanisms , 2013, 2013 IEEE/ASME International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics.

[9]  J. Paros How to design flexure hinges , 1965 .

[10]  Lena Zentner,et al.  General design equations for the rotational stiffness, maximal angular deflection and rotational precision of various notch flexure hinges , 2017 .

[11]  Yong Mo Moon,et al.  DESIGN OF LARGE-DISPLACEMENT COMPLIANT JOINTS , 2005 .

[12]  Stuart T. Smith,et al.  ELLIPTICAL FLEXURE HINGES , 1997 .

[13]  S. Du,et al.  A novel design of a high-performance flexure hinge with reverse parallel connection multiple-cross-springs. , 2020, The Review of scientific instruments.

[14]  Matt Cullin,et al.  Planar Compliances of Symmetric Notch Flexure Hinges: The Right Circularly Corner-Filleted Parabolic Design , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering.

[15]  Michael Goldfarb,et al.  A Well-Behaved Revolute Flexure Joint for Compliant Mechanism Design , 1999 .

[16]  Robert McIntyre Fowler,et al.  Flex-16: A Large-Displacement Monolithic Compliant Rotational Hinge , 2014 .

[17]  A Hasse,et al.  Modal synthesis of belt-rib structures , 2011 .