Synchrony and perturbation transmission in trophic metacommunities

In a world where natural habitats are ever more fragmented, the dynamics of meta-communities is essential to properly understand species responses to perturbations. If species’ populations fluctuate asynchronously, the risk of their simultaneous extinction is low, thus reducing the species’ regional extinction risk. We propose a metacommunity model consisting of two food chains connected by dispersal to study the transmission of small perturbations affecting populations in the vicinity of an equilibrium. We show that perturbing a species in one patch can lead to asynchrony between patches if the perturbed species is not the most affected by dispersal. Dispersal affects rare species the most, thus making biomass distribution critical to understand the response of trophic metacommunities to perturbations. We further partition the effect of each perturbation on species synchrony when several independent perturbations are applied. Our approach allows disentangling and predicting the responses of simple trophic metacommunities to perturbations, thus providing a theoretical foundation for future studies considering more complex spatial ecological systems.

[1]  M. Loreau,et al.  Stability trophic cascades in food chains , 2018, Royal Society Open Science.

[2]  K S McCann,et al.  The dynamics of spatially coupled food webs. , 2005, Ecology letters.

[3]  Karen C. Abbott A dispersal-induced paradox: synchrony and stability in stochastic metapopulations. , 2011, Ecology letters.

[4]  M. Loreau,et al.  Pyramids and cascades: a synthesis of food chain functioning and stability , 2018, bioRxiv.

[5]  M. E. Conners,et al.  PREY PREFERENCE BY A TOP PREDATOR AND THE STABILITY OF LINKED FOOD CHAINS , 2000 .

[6]  João Pedro Hespanha,et al.  Direct numerical solution of algebraic Lyapunov equations for large-scale systems using Quantized Tensor Trains , 2013, 52nd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[7]  M. Loreau,et al.  Density-dependent dispersal and relative dispersal affect the stability of predator-prey metacommunities. , 2010, Journal of theoretical biology.

[8]  A. Ives,et al.  Food web dynamics in correlated and autocorrelated environments. , 2003, Theoretical population biology.

[9]  M. Loreau,et al.  Resilience, reactivity and variability: A mathematical comparison of ecological stability measures. , 2015, Journal of theoretical biology.

[10]  M. Araújo,et al.  Spatial trophic cascades in communities connected by dispersal and foraging. , 2019, Ecology.

[11]  M. Loreau,et al.  Dispersal and metapopulation stability , 2015, PeerJ.

[12]  J. Fox,et al.  Environmental fluctuations can stabilize food web dynamics by increasing synchrony. , 2007, Ecology letters.

[13]  R. Didham,et al.  Landscape moderation of biodiversity patterns and processes ‐ eight hypotheses , 2012, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[14]  C. Hui,et al.  Density-dependent dispersal complicates spatial synchrony in tri-trophic food chains , 2015, Population Ecology.

[15]  K. L. Cottingham,et al.  Linking the green and brown worlds: the prevalence and effect of multichannel feeding in food webs , 2014 .

[16]  K. McCann,et al.  HSS revisited: multi-channel processes mediate trophic control across a productivity gradient. , 2015, Ecology letters.

[17]  Jonathan M. Chase,et al.  Metacommunity Ecology, Volume 59 , 2017 .

[18]  Neil Rooney,et al.  A landscape theory for food web architecture. , 2008, Ecology letters.

[19]  É. Thébault,et al.  Interactions between the green and brown food web determine ecosystem functioning , 2016 .

[20]  Justin N. Marleau,et al.  Nutrient flows between ecosystems can destabilize simple food chains. , 2010, Journal of theoretical biology.

[21]  M. Loreau,et al.  Subsidy hypothesis and strength of trophic cascades across ecosystems. , 2008, Ecology letters.

[22]  J. Ripa,et al.  The Coupling Between Grazing and Detritus Food Chains and the Strength of Trophic Cascades Across a Gradient of Nutrient Enrichment , 2008, Ecosystems.

[23]  Eric J. Pedersen,et al.  Nonhierarchical Dispersal Promotes Stability and Resilience in a Tritrophic Metacommunity , 2016, The American Naturalist.

[24]  L. Arnold Stochastic Differential Equations: Theory and Applications , 1992 .

[25]  Kevin McCann,et al.  Structural asymmetry and the stability of diverse food webs , 2006, Nature.

[26]  Michel Loreau,et al.  A mathematical synthesis of niche and neutral theories in community ecology. , 2011, Journal of theoretical biology.

[27]  Ellen I. Damschen,et al.  Habitat fragmentation and its lasting impact on Earth’s ecosystems , 2015, Science Advances.

[28]  Priyanga Amarasekare,et al.  Spatial Dynamics of Foodwebs , 2008 .

[29]  Andrew M. Liebhold,et al.  Spatial Synchrony in Population Dynamics , 2004 .

[30]  V. Jansen,et al.  Phase locking: another cause of synchronicity in predator-prey systems. , 1999, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[31]  Y. Vadeboncoeur,et al.  FISHES AS INTEGRATORS OF BENTHIC AND PELAGIC FOOD WEBS IN LAKES , 2002 .

[32]  Yuval R. Zelnik,et al.  The three regimes of spatial recovery , 2018, bioRxiv.

[33]  Shawn J. Leroux,et al.  Dynamics of Reciprocal Pulsed Subsidies in Local and Meta-Ecosystems , 2011, Ecosystems.

[34]  Jonathan M. Chase,et al.  Trophic cascades across ecosystems , 2005, Nature.

[35]  Jonathan M. Chase,et al.  The metacommunity concept: a framework for multi-scale community ecology , 2004 .

[36]  Katia Koelle,et al.  Dispersal‐induced desynchronization: from metapopulations to metacommunities , 2004 .

[37]  Michael W. McCoy,et al.  Predator shadows: complex life histories as generators of spatially patterned indirect interactions across ecosystems , 2009 .

[38]  Bernd Blasius,et al.  Complex dynamics and phase synchronization in spatially extended ecological systems , 1999, Nature.

[39]  S. Diehl,et al.  Simple rules describe bottom-up and top-down control in food webs with alternative energy pathways. , 2012, Ecology letters.

[40]  M. Llope,et al.  Predator transitory spillover induces trophic cascades in ecological sinks , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[41]  K. McCann,et al.  Effects of Multi-chain Omnivory on the Strength of Trophic Control in Lakes , 2005, Ecosystems.

[42]  J. L. Gittleman,et al.  Predicting extinction risk in declining species , 2000, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[43]  Serhiy Morozov,et al.  A Distributed, Architecture-Centric Approach to Computing Accurate Recommendations from Very Large and Sparse Datasets , 2011 .

[44]  M. Loreau,et al.  An a posteriori species clustering for quantifying the effects of species interactions on ecosystem functioning , 2017 .

[45]  M. Loreau,et al.  The inherent multidimensionality of temporal variability: how common and rare species shape stability patterns. , 2019, Ecology letters.

[46]  A. Hastings,et al.  Weak trophic interactions and the balance of nature , 1998, Nature.

[47]  M. C. Diaw,et al.  Summary for policymakers of the regional assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services for Africa of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services , 2018 .

[48]  Robert D Holt,et al.  Spatial Heterogeneity, Indirect Interactions, and the Coexistence of Prey Species , 1984, The American Naturalist.

[49]  M. Bradford,et al.  Nitrogen recycling in coupled green and brown food webs: Weak effects of herbivory and detritivory when nitrogen passes through soil , 2018, Journal of Ecology.

[50]  George R. Price,et al.  Selection and Covariance , 1970, Nature.

[51]  Dominique Gravel,et al.  The Paradox of Enrichment in Metaecosystems , 2014, The American Naturalist.

[52]  J. Fox,et al.  Phase-locking and environmental fluctuations generate synchrony in a predator–prey community , 2009, Nature.

[53]  Michel Loreau,et al.  Partitioning selection and complementarity in biodiversity experiments , 2001, Nature.