Two exposed amino acid residues confer thermostability on a cold shock protein

Thermophilic organisms produce proteins of exceptional stability. To understand protein thermostability at the molecular level we studied a pair of cold shock proteins, one of mesophilic and one of thermophilic origin, by systematic mutagenesis. Although the two proteins differ in sequence at 12 positions, two surface-exposed residues are responsible for the increase in stability of the thermophilic protein (by 15.8 kJ mol−1 at 70 °C). 11.5 kJ mol−1 originate from a predominantly electrostatic contribution of Arg 3 and 5.2 kJ mol−1 from hydrophobic interactions of Leu 66 at the carboxy terminus. The mesophilic protein could be converted to a highly thermostable form by changing the Glu residues at positions 3 and 66 to Arg and Leu, respectively. The variation of surface residues may thus provide a simple and powerful approach for increasing the thermostability of a protein.

[1]  J A McCammon,et al.  Molecular dynamics simulations of the hyperthermophilic protein sac7d from Sulfolobus acidocaldarius: contribution of salt bridges to thermostability. , 1999, Journal of molecular biology.

[2]  Hermann Schindelin,et al.  Universal nucleic acid-binding domain revealed by crystal structure of the B. subtilis major cold-shock protein , 1993, Nature.

[3]  G. Makhatadze,et al.  Engineering a thermostable protein via optimization of charge-charge interactions on the protein surface. , 1999, Biochemistry.

[4]  Mohamed A. Marahiel,et al.  Conservation of rapid two-state folding in mesophilic, thermophilic and hyperthermophilic cold shock proteins , 1998, Nature Structural Biology.

[5]  U Mueller,et al.  Thermal stability and atomic-resolution crystal structure of the Bacillus caldolyticus cold shock protein. , 2000, Journal of molecular biology.

[6]  S. Kawamura,et al.  Investigation of the Structural Basis for Thermostability of DNA-binding Protein HU from Bacillus stearothermophilus * , 1998, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[7]  K. S. Yip,et al.  Protein thermostability above 100°C: A key role for ionic interactions , 1998 .

[8]  A. Elcock The stability of salt bridges at high temperatures: implications for hyperthermophilic proteins. , 1998, Journal of molecular biology.

[9]  B. Tidor,et al.  Rational modification of protein stability by the mutation of charged surface residues. , 2000, Biochemistry.

[10]  A. Karshikoff,et al.  Proteins from thermophilic and mesophilic organisms essentially do not differ in packing. , 1998, Protein engineering.

[11]  G. Böhm,et al.  The stability of proteins in extreme environments. , 1998, Current opinion in structural biology.

[12]  S. L. Mayo,et al.  Computational protein design. , 1999, Structure.

[13]  R. Huber,et al.  Small structural changes account for the high thermostability of 1[4Fe-4S] ferredoxin from the hyperthermophilic bacterium Thermotoga maritima. , 1996, Structure.

[14]  M. Marahiel,et al.  Overproduction, crystallization, and preliminary X‐ray diffraction studies of the major cold shock protein from Bacillus subtilis, CspB , 1992, Proteins.

[15]  F. Arnold,et al.  Directed evolution of biocatalysts. , 1999, Current opinion in chemical biology.

[16]  G. Olsen,et al.  Thermal adaptation analyzed by comparison of protein sequences from mesophilic and extremely thermophilic Methanococcus species. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[17]  M. Marahiel,et al.  Characterization of cspB, a Bacillus subtilis inducible cold shock gene affecting cell viability at low temperatures , 1992, Journal of bacteriology.

[18]  D N Woolfson,et al.  Core-directed protein design. I. An experimental method for selecting stable proteins from combinatorial libraries. , 1999, Biochemistry.

[19]  C. Gualerzi,et al.  Massive presence of the Escherichia coli ‘majorcold‐shock protein’ CspA under non‐stress conditions , 1999, The EMBO journal.

[20]  M. Marahiel,et al.  A superfamily of proteins that contain the cold-shock domain. , 1998, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[21]  Kevin L. Shaw,et al.  Increasing protein stability by altering long‐range coulombic interactions , 1999, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[22]  P. Privalov,et al.  Energetics of protein structure. , 1995, Advances in protein chemistry.

[23]  Bruce Tidor,et al.  Electrostatic interactions in the GCN4 leucine zipper: Substantial contributions arise from intramolecular interactions enhanced on binding , 1999, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[24]  B Honig,et al.  Electrostatic contributions to the stability of hyperthermophilic proteins. , 1999, Journal of molecular biology.

[25]  J. Lebbink,et al.  Engineering activity and stability of Thermotoga maritima glutamate dehydrogenase. II: construction of a 16-residue ion-pair network at the subunit interface. , 1999, Journal of molecular biology.

[26]  J R Desjarlais,et al.  Side-chain and backbone flexibility in protein core design. , 1999, Journal of molecular biology.

[27]  U. Hahn,et al.  Stability and folding kinetics of ribonuclease T1 are strongly altered by the replacement of cis-proline 39 with alanine. , 1993, Journal of molecular biology.

[28]  J. Lebbink,et al.  Engineering activity and stability of Thermotoga maritima glutamate dehydrogenase. I. Introduction of a six-residue ion-pair network in the hinge region. , 1998, Journal of molecular biology.

[29]  A. Plückthun,et al.  Selecting proteins with improved stability by a phage-based method , 1998, Nature Biotechnology.

[30]  S. Knapp,et al.  Refined crystal structure of a superoxide dismutase from the hyperthermophilic archaeon Sulfolobus acidocaldarius at 2.2 A resolution. , 1999, Journal of molecular biology.