Pertinence generation in radiological diagnosis: Spreading activation and the nature of expertise

An empirical study of human expert reasoning processes is presented. Its purpose is to test a model of how a human expert's cognitive system learns to detect, and does detect, pertinent data and hypotheses. This process is called pertinence generation. The model is based on the phenomenon of spreading activation within semantic networks. Twenty-two radiologists were asked to produce diagnoses from two very difficult X-ray films. As the model predicted, pertinence increased with experience and with semantic network integration. However, the experts whose daily work involved explicit reasoning were able, in addition, to go beyond and to generate more pertinence. The results suggest that two qualitatively different kinds of expertise, basic and super, should be distinguished. A reinterpretation of the results of Lesgold et al. (1988) is proposed, suggesting that apparent nonmonotonicities in performance are not representative of common radiological expertise acquisition but result from the inclusion of basic and super expertise on the same curve.

[1]  Hubert L. Dreyfus,et al.  Mind over Machine: The Power of Human Intuition and Expertise in the Era of the Computer , 1987, IEEE Expert.

[2]  L R Brooks,et al.  The correlation of feature identification and category judgments in diagnostic radiology , 1992, Memory & cognition.

[3]  R. Glaser,et al.  Expertise in a complex skill: Diagnosing x-ray pictures. , 1988 .

[4]  Randall W. Engle,et al.  Working-memory capacity as long-term memory activation: An individual-differences approach. , 1993 .

[5]  Noble Harter,et al.  Studies in the physiology and psychology of the telegraphic language , 1897 .

[6]  Georges Bordage,et al.  Propositional Versus Structural Semantic Analysis of Medical Diagnostic Thinking , 1992, Cogn. Sci..

[7]  Hans Gruber,et al.  Expertise and hierarchical knowledge representation in chess , 1992 .

[8]  Allen Newell,et al.  Human Problem Solving. , 1973 .

[9]  Michelene T. H. Chi,et al.  An Interactive Model of Strategic Processing , 1986 .

[10]  H L Kundel,et al.  Comparison scans while reading chest images. Taught, but not practiced. , 1984, Investigative radiology.

[11]  M. Denis.  Image et cognition , 1989 .

[12]  Kevin S. Berbaum,et al.  Satisfaction of search in diagnostic radiology. , 1989 .

[13]  R. Frick,et al.  Implicit Learning and Concept Learning , 1995, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[14]  E. Weber,et al.  Determinants of diagnostic hypothesis generation: effects of information, base rates, and experience. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[15]  J. Smedslund.  THE CONCEPT OF CORRELATION IN ADULTS , 1963 .

[16]  D. Medin,et al.  Problem structure and the use of base-rate information from experience. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[17]  Walter Schneider,et al.  Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending and a general theory. , 1977 .

[18]  Mitchell Rabinowitz.  Semantic and Strategic Processing: Independent Roles in Determining Memory Performance , 1991 .

[19]  H L Kundel,et al.  A visual concept shapes image perception. , 1983, Radiology.

[20]  H. Simon,et al.  The mind's eye in chess. , 1973 .

[21]  H L Kundel,et al.  Mechanism of satisfaction of search: eye position recordings in the reading of chest radiographs. , 1995, Radiology.

[22]  Clifford R. Mynatt,et al.  The influence of feedback and diagnostic data on pseudodiagnosticity , 1981 .

[23]  K. A. Ericsson,et al.  Toward a general theory of expertise : prospects and limits , 1991 .

[24]  L Hasher,et al.  Automatic processing of fundamental information: the case of frequency of occurrence. , 1984, The American psychologist.

[25]  R. Light.  Measures of response agreement for qualitative data: Some generalizations and alternatives. , 1971 .

[26]  H L Kundel,et al.  The influence of prior knowledge on visual search strategies during the viewing of chest radiographs. , 1969, Radiology.

[27]  J. Shanteau.  How much information does an expert use? Is it relevant? , 1992 .

[28]  A. Tversky,et al.  On the psychology of prediction , 1973 .

[29]  H. Simon,et al.  Perception in chess , 1973 .

[30]  L. Shulman,et al.  Medical Problem Solving: An Analysis of Clinical Reasoning , 1978 .

[31]  Vimla L. Patel,et al.  Knowledge Based Solution Strategies in Medical Reasoning , 1986, Cogn. Sci..

[32]  K. A. Ericsson,et al.  Long-term working memory. , 1995, Psychological review.

[33]  J. J. Geraghty,et al.  The Influence of Clinical History on Visual Search with Single and Multiple Abnormalities , 1993, Investigative radiology.

[34]  W. Chase,et al.  Visual information processing. , 1974 .

[35]  V. Patel,et al.  Domain Knowledge and Hypothesis Genenation in Diagnostic Reasoning , 1990, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[36]  J. Anderson,et al.  Automaticity and the ACT* theory. , 1992, The American journal of psychology.

[37]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Parallel distributed processing: explorations in the microstructure of cognition, vol. 1: foundations , 1986 .

[38]  D. Balota,et al.  Summation of activation: evidence from multiple primes that converge and diverge within semantic memory. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[39]  M. Rabinowitz,et al.  Conceptual Knowledge Processing: An Oxymoron? , 1990 .

[40]  D. Balota,et al.  Depth of Automatic Spreading Activation: Mediated Priming Effects in Pronunciation but Not in Lexical Decision , 1986 .

[41]  V R Neufeld,et al.  The clinical reasoning of randomly selected physicians in general medical practice. , 1982, Clinical and investigative medicine. Medecine clinique et experimentale.

[42]  Vimla L. Patel,et al.  The general and specific nature of medical expertise: A critical look. , 1991 .

[43]  P. Slovic,et al.  An analysis-of-variance model for the assessment of configural cue utilization in clinical judgment. , 1968, Psychological bulletin.

[44]  Robert J. Sternberg,et al.  On being an expert: a cost-benefit analysis , 1992 .

[45]  O. G. Selfridge,et al.  Pandemonium: a paradigm for learning , 1988 .

[46]  John R. Anderson.  The Architecture of Cognition , 1983 .

[47]  H P Boshuizen,et al.  The influence of medical expertise, case typicality, and illness script component on case processing and disease probability estimates , 1996, Memory & cognition.

[48]  Allan Collins,et al.  A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing , 1975 .

[49]  K. Holyoak.  Symbolic connectionism: Toward third-generation theories of expertise. , 1991 .

[50]  Jens Rasmussen,et al.  The reflective expert and the prenovice: Notes on skill-, rule- and knowledge-based performance in the setting of instruction and training , 1989 .

[51]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  Spreading activation versus compound cue accounts of priming: mediated priming revisited. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[52]  Robert J. Crutcher,et al.  The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. , 1993 .

[53]  Franz Emanuel Weinert,et al.  Interactions Among Aptitudes, Strategies, and Knowledge in Cognitive Performance , 1990 .