JCat: a novel tool to adapt codon usage of a target gene to its potential expression host

A novel method for the adaptation of target gene codon usage to most sequenced prokaryotes and selected eukaryotic gene expression hosts was developed to improve heterologous protein production. In contrast to existing tools, JCat (Java Codon Adaptation Tool) does not require the manual definition of highly expressed genes and is, therefore, a very rapid and easy method. Further options of JCat for codon adaptation include the avoidance of unwanted cleavage sites for restriction enzymes and Rho-independent transcription terminators. The output of JCat is both graphically and as Codon Adaptation Index (CAI) values given for the pasted sequence and the newly adapted sequence. Additionally, a list of genes in FASTA-format can be uploaded to calculate CAI values. In one example, all genes of the genome of Caenorhabditis elegans were adapted to Escherichia coli codon usage and further optimized to avoid commonly used restriction sites. In a second example, the Pseudomonas aeruginosa exbD gene codon usage was adapted to E.coli codon usage with parallel avoidance of the same restriction sites. For both, the degree of introduced changes was documented and evaluated. JCat is integrated into the PRODORIC database that hosts all required information on the various organisms to fulfill the requested calculations. JCat is freely accessible at .

[1]  F. Studier,et al.  Consecutive low-usage leucine codons block translation only when near the 5' end of a message in Escherichia coli. , 1995, Journal of molecular biology.

[2]  A. Fuglsang Codon optimizer: a freeware tool for codon optimization. , 2003, Protein Expression and Purification.

[3]  Edgar Wingender,et al.  PRODORIC: prokaryotic database of gene regulation , 2003, Nucleic Acids Res..

[4]  S. Salzberg,et al.  Prediction of transcription terminators in bacterial genomes. , 2000, Journal of molecular biology.

[5]  P. Sharp,et al.  The codon Adaptation Index--a measure of directional synonymous codon usage bias, and its potential applications. , 1987, Nucleic acids research.

[6]  T. Ikemura Codon usage and tRNA content in unicellular and multicellular organisms. , 1985, Molecular biology and evolution.

[7]  Richard J. Roberts,et al.  REBASE: restriction enzymes and methyltransferases , 2003, Nucleic Acids Res..

[8]  T. Oas,et al.  High-level misincorporation of lysine for arginine at AGA codons in a fusion protein expressed in Escherichia coli. , 1996, Journal of molecular biology.

[9]  S. Govindarajan,et al.  Codon bias and heterologous protein expression. , 2004, Trends in biotechnology.

[10]  S. Sligar,et al.  Human hemoglobin expression in Escherichia coli: importance of optimal codon usage. , 1992, Biochemistry.

[11]  U. Brinkmann,et al.  High-level expression of recombinant genes in Escherichia coli is dependent on the availability of the dnaY gene product. , 1989, Gene.

[12]  C. Kurland,et al.  Codon usage determines translation rate in Escherichia coli. , 1989, Journal of molecular biology.

[13]  E. Brody,et al.  Prediction of rho-independent Escherichia coli transcription terminators. A statistical analysis of their RNA stem-loop structures. , 1990 .

[14]  Alessandra Carbone,et al.  Codon adaptation index as a measure of dominating codon bias , 2003, Bioinform..

[15]  Wentao Gao,et al.  UpGene: Application of a Web‐Based DNA Codon Optimization Algorithm , 2008, Biotechnology progress.

[16]  M. Gouy,et al.  Codon usage in bacteria: correlation with gene expressivity. , 1982, Nucleic acids research.

[17]  T. Ikemura Correlation between the abundance of Escherichia coli transfer RNAs and the occurrence of the respective codons in its protein genes. , 1981, Journal of molecular biology.