LaRiMo - A simple and efficient GIS-based approach for large-scale morphological assessment of large European rivers.

Large rivers cover and function over large spatial extents. Accordingly, the detailed assessment of their morphology is complex. Here, a methodology is presented to assess large rivers' morphology (LaRiMo) based on free datasets of geographic information systems. This approach could help to achieve a comparable, transboundary assessment of large river morphology to support the implementation of the European Water Framework Directive. The analyses are based on seven parameters describing processes and characteristics related to large river morphology. These parameters are evaluated for and compared between the rivers Danube, Elbe and Loire. A significantly higher amount of gravel and sand bars within the river bed strongly supported the overall higher morphological status of the Loire. A PCA highlighted that the parameters Wetlands, Active Riparian Zones and Free Flowing Sections similarly described a good morphological situation. In contrast, Canal, Dams and Impervious Surface indicated bad morphological conditions. Finally, the approach was successfully validated with data from a detailed, field-based morphological assessment for the Danube. LaRiMo represents an efficient and cost-effective approach to assess large river morphology across large extents. This method provides comparable results across countries and regions.

[1]  Andrew R.G. Large,et al.  Using Google Earth, A Virtual‐Globe Imaging Platform, for Ecosystem Services‐Based River Assessment , 2015 .

[2]  U. Uehlinger,et al.  Rivers of Europe , 2009 .

[3]  Adrian Stanica,et al.  Challenges of river basin management: Current status of, and prospects for, the River Danube from a river engineering perspective. , 2016, The Science of the total environment.

[4]  Anne Lyche Solheim,et al.  Managing aquatic ecosystems and water resources under multiple stress--an introduction to the MARS project. , 2015, The Science of the total environment.

[5]  A. Arthington,et al.  Basic Principles and Ecological Consequences of Altered Flow Regimes for Aquatic Biodiversity , 2002, Environmental management.

[6]  G. Urbanič,et al.  Is it time to eliminate field surveys from hydromorphological assessments of rivers?—Comparison between a field survey and a remote sensing approach , 2018 .

[7]  J. Olden,et al.  Process-Based Principles for Restoring River Ecosystems , 2010 .

[8]  Daniele Tonina,et al.  Comparison of hydromorphological assessment methods: Application to the Boise River, USA , 2013 .

[9]  Sovan Lek,et al.  Fish zonation and indicator species for the evaluation of the ecological status of rivers: example of the Loire basin (France) , 2007 .

[10]  S. Schmutz,et al.  Spatio‐temporal habitat dynamics in a changing Danube River landscape 1812—2006 , 2011 .

[11]  Thomas Euler,et al.  Assessment of the structural quality of streams in Germany—basic description and current status , 2014, Environmental Monitoring and Assessment.

[12]  M. Rinaldi,et al.  A review of assessment methods for river hydromorphology , 2015, Environmental Earth Sciences.

[13]  J. Stanford,et al.  Ecological connectivity in alluvial river ecosystems and its disruption by flow regulation , 1995 .

[14]  Nigel Holmes,et al.  Benchmarking habitat quality: observations using River Habitat Survey on near‐natural streams and rivers in northern and western Europe , 2010 .

[15]  K. McDonald,et al.  Remote sensing analysis of physical complexity of North Pacific Rim rivers to assist wild salmon conservation , 2010 .

[16]  Monica Rivas Casado,et al.  Towards a Transferable UAV-Based Framework for River Hydromorphological Characterization , 2017, Sensors.

[17]  Scott J. Goetz,et al.  REMOTE SENSING OF RIPARIAN BUFFERS: PAST PROGRESS AND FUTURE PROSPECTS 1 , 2006 .

[18]  N. Panin,et al.  Danube River Sediment Input and its Interaction with the North-western Black Sea , 2002 .

[19]  P. Ashworth,et al.  How do big rivers come to be different , 2012 .

[20]  Bodis Katalin,et al.  Developing a pan-European Data Base of Drainage Newtorks and Catchment Boundaries from a 100 Meter DEM , 2007 .

[21]  C. Frissell,et al.  A hierarchical framework for stream habitat classification: Viewing streams in a watershed context , 1986 .

[22]  M. Dvorak,et al.  Comparative analysis of selected hydromorphological assessment methods , 2010, Environmental monitoring and assessment.

[23]  R. Naiman,et al.  The Ecology of Interfaces: Riparian Zones , 1997 .

[24]  Á. Borja,et al.  The European Water Framework Directive at the age of 10: a critical review of the achievements with recommendations for the future. , 2010, The Science of the total environment.

[25]  K. Tockner,et al.  Multiple stressors in coupled river–floodplain ecosystems , 2010 .

[26]  A. Large,et al.  ‘Natural’ rivers, ‘hydromorphological quality’ and river restoration: a challenging new agenda for applied fluvial geomorphology , 2006 .

[27]  S. Schmutz,et al.  Importance of multi-dimensional morphodynamics for habitat evolution: Danube River 1715–2006 , 2014 .

[28]  R. Grabowski,et al.  The use of remote sensing to characterise hydromorphological properties of European rivers , 2015, Aquatic Sciences.

[29]  F. Comiti,et al.  Characterising physical habitats and fluvial hydromorphology: A new system for the survey and classification of river geomorphic units , 2017 .

[30]  C. Nilsson,et al.  Alterations of Riparian Ecosystems Caused by River Regulation , 2000 .

[31]  J. Matschullat,et al.  Hydromorphological assessment within the EU-Water Framework Directive—trans-boundary cooperation and application to different water basins , 2008, Hydrobiologia.

[32]  Gernot Ramminger,et al.  Europe's Green Arteries - A Continental Dataset of Riparian Zones , 2016, Remote. Sens..

[33]  Tim D. Fletcher,et al.  Stream restoration in urban catchments through redesigning stormwater systems: looking to the catchment to save the stream , 2005, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[34]  T. Bernhardsen.  Geographic Information Systems: An Introduction , 1999 .

[35]  P. Raška,et al.  Effects of Damming on Long‐Term Development of Fluvial Islands, Elbe River (N Czechia) , 2017 .

[36]  M. Chadwick.  Stream Ecology: Structure and Function of Running Waters , 2008 .

[37]  R. Meentemeyer,et al.  Effects of dam operation and land use on stream channel morphology and riparian vegetation , 2006 .

[38]  Sebastian Birk,et al.  Intercalibration of aquatic ecological assessment methods in the European Union: Lessons learned and way forward , 2014 .

[39]  Stream Ecology: Structure and Function of Running Waters , 1994 .

[40]  Martin Kernan,et al.  Assessing the ecological status in the context of the European Water Framework Directive: where do we go now? , 2014, The Science of the total environment.