Controversies of technology convergence within the European Union

Purpose – This paper aims to provide empirical evidence on technology convergence within economies of the European Union which is usable for determining the economic growth policy aimed at sustainable long‐run economic growth and the convergence of the development between EU‐member states.Design/methodology/approach – Two different empirical procedures are applied by estimating the technology convergence within the European Union on Eurostat data set. The first is framework developed by Dowrick and Nguyen. The second one is the authors' original contribution to the methodology which is based on the frontier production functions.Findings – Significant technology convergence is recognized between 15 old EU‐member states and eight new‐member states. However, the technology convergence has obviously not accelerated the convergence of gross domestic product per labor unit between exposed groups of economies. Technical inefficiency is recognized as the main source that impedes a spill‐over effect of technology ...

[1]  J. Brada,et al.  Technological progress and technical efficiency in Chinese industrial growth: A frontier production function approach , 1990 .

[2]  Dusan Lesjak,et al.  Transitioning the Slovene Economy: An Information Technology Perspective , 2001 .

[3]  Petter Gottschalk,et al.  Critical success factors from IT outsourcing theories: an empirical study , 2005, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[4]  S. Dowrick,et al.  OECD Comparative Economic Growth 1950-85: Catch-Up and Convergence , 1989 .

[5]  P. Vanhoudt.  Did the European unification induce economic growth? In search of scale effects and persistent changes , 1999 .

[6]  Teresa L. Ju,et al.  A strategic contingency model for technology alliance , 2005, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[7]  Mohan P. Rao.  A performance measurement system using a profit-linked multi-factor measurement model , 2006, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[8]  R. Mahadevan.  A frontier approach to measuring total factor productivity growth in Singapore's services sector , 2002 .

[9]  G. Renshaw.  Maths for Economics , 2005 .

[10]  Kaliappa Kalirajan,et al.  Frontier Production Functions and Technical Efficiency Measures , 1999 .

[11]  Kongkiti Phusavat,et al.  Productivity/performance measurement: Case application at the government pharmaceutical organization , 2006, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[12]  Antonia Ruiz Moreno,et al.  Strategic capabilities and their effects on performance: entrepreneurial, learning, innovator and problematic SMEs , 2006 .

[13]  Urmas Varblane,et al.  An Analysis of the Economic Convergence Process in the Transition Countries , 2005 .

[14]  J. Bekő.  The validity of the balance-of-payments-constrained growth model for a small economy in transition: the case of Slovenia , 2003 .

[15]  Shu-Chiung Lin,et al.  How R&D management practice affects innovation performance: An investigation of the high-tech industry in Taiwan , 2006, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[16]  Mejra Festić,et al.  Disinflation in Slovenia : Evidence from an Iterative Multisectoral Model , 2004 .

[17]  Nada Trunk Sirca,et al.  Lifelong learning: case study in higher education in Slovenia , 2005 .

[18]  Qiang Wang,et al.  The impact of information technology on the competitive advantage of logistics firms in China , 2006, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[19]  Egon Žižmond,et al.  Sectoral Reallocation of Labour as a Limit on Total Factor Productivity Growth in Slovenia , 2006 .

[20]  J. Madsen,et al.  Technology spillover through trade and TFP convergence: 135 years of evidence for the OECD countries , 2005 .

[21]  David J. Sumanth,et al.  Total Productivity Management , 1997 .

[22]  Jasminka Šohinger,et al.  Growth and Convergence in European Transition Economies : The Impact of Foreign Direct Investment , 2005 .

[23]  Kari Alho,et al.  Speed of Convergence and Relocation – New EU Member Countries Catching up with the Old. CEPS ENEPRI Working Papers No. 34, 1 April 2005 , 2005 .

[24]  Giovanni Urga,et al.  Convergence in Output in Transition Economies Central & Eastern Europe, 1970-1995 , 1997 .

[25]  Ivan Garcia-Bassets,et al.  Technological convergence throughout the eras: Part 3 – Biotechnology , 2008 .

[26]  Nazrul Islam,et al.  What have We Learnt from the Convergence Debate , 2003 .

[27]  Maks Tajnikar.  Transitional Adjustment of Large Companies in Slovenia and Economic Policy , 2001 .

[28]  F. J. Velázquez,et al.  An Assessment of Real Convergence of Less Developed EU Members: Lessons for the CEEC Candidates , 2001 .

[29]  Reggie Davidrajuh,et al.  Building a fuzzy logic based tool for e-readiness measurement , 2008, Electron. Gov. an Int. J..

[30]  David J. Sumanth.  Total Productivity Management (TPmgt) : A Systemic and Quantitative Approach to Compete in Quality, Price and Time , 1997 .

[31]  Andrew B. Bernard,et al.  Technology and Convergence , 1996 .

[32]  K. Kalirajan,et al.  FRONTIER PRODUCTION FUNCTION: THE STOCHASTIC COEFFICIENTS APPROACH , 2009 .

[33]  Roberto Mura,et al.  How to Measure the Unobservable: A Panel Technique for the Analysis of TFP Convergence , 2005 .

[34]  Patrick Lenain,et al.  Enhancing Income Convergence in Central Europe after EU Accession , 2004 .

[35]  Nuria González-Alvarez,et al.  Protection and internal transfer of technological competencies: The role of causal ambiguity , 2005, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[36]  Ismael Sanz,et al.  Consequences of enlargement for European Regional Policy: the spanish viewpoint , 2003 .