Dynamic deformations and the M6.7, Northridge, California earthquake

Abstract A method of estimating the complete time-varying dynamic formation field from commonly available three-component single station seismic data has been developed and applied to study the relationship between dynamic deformation and ground failures and structural damage using observations from the 1994 Northridge, California earthquake. Estimates from throughout the epicentral region indicate that the horizontal strains exceed the vertical ones by more than a factor of two. The largest strains (exceeding ∼100 pstrain) correlate with regions of greatest ground failure. There is a poor correlation between structural damage and peak strain amplitudes. The smallest strains,∼35 pstrain, are estimated in regions of no damage or ground failure. Estimates in the two regions with most severe and well mapped permanent deformation, Potrero Canyon and the Granada-Mission Hills regions, exhibit the largest strains; peak horizontal strains estimates in these regions equal ∼1351 and ∼229 μstrain respectively. Of note, the dynamic principal strain axes have strikers consistent with the permanent failure features suggesting that, while gravity, sub-surface materials, and hydrologic conditions undoubtedly played fundamental roles in determining where and what types of failures occurred, the dynamic deformation field may have been favorably sized and oriented to initiate failure processes. These results support other studies that conclude that the permanent deformation resulted from ground shaking, rather than from static strains associated with primary or secondary faulting. They also suggest that such an analysis, either using data or theoretical calculations, may enable observations of paleo-ground failure to be used as quantitative constraints on the size and geometry of previous earthquakes.

[1]  Charles A. Langston,et al.  The February 9, 1971 San Fernando earthquake: A study of source finiteness in teleseismic body waves , 1978, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[2]  David Carver,et al.  Urban seismology—Northridge aftershocks recorded by multi-scale arrays of portable digital seismographs , 1996 .

[3]  L. M. Baker,et al.  Transient stresses at Parkfield, California, produced by the M 7.4 Landers earthquake of June 28, 1992: Observations from the UPSAR dense seismograph array , 1995 .

[4]  Paul M. Davis,et al.  Localized Amplification of Seismic Waves and Correlation with Damae due to the Northridge Earthquake: Evidence for Focusing in Santa Monica , 1996 .

[5]  Keiiti Aki,et al.  Strain, tilt, and rotation associated with strong ground motion in the vicinity of earthquake faults , 1982 .

[6]  Hiroo Kanamori,et al.  Source complexity of the 1994 Northridge earthquake and its relation to aftershock mechanisms , 1996, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[7]  Thomas H. Heaton,et al.  The slip history of the 1994 Northridge, California, earthquake determined from strong-motion, teleseismic, GPS, and leveling data , 1996, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[8]  Yuehua Zeng,et al.  A composite source model of the 1994 Northridge earthquake using genetic algorithms , 1996, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[9]  Jonathan P. Stewart,et al.  Incidents of ground failure from the 1994 Northridge earthquake , 1996 .

[10]  Mihailo D. Trifunac,et al.  Peak surface strains during strong earthquake motion , 1996 .

[11]  Mihailo D. Trifunac,et al.  Peak velocities and peak surface strains during Northridge, California, earthquake of 17 January 1994 , 1996 .

[12]  Jean-Pierre Bardet,et al.  Engineering observations on ground motion at the Van Norman Complex after the 1994 Northridge earthquake , 1996 .

[13]  Margaret Hellweg,et al.  Directional topographic site response at Tarzana observed in aftershocks of the 1994 Northridge, California, earthquake: Implications for mainshock motions , 1996, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[14]  R. P. Maley,et al.  Accelerograms recorded at USGS National Strong-Motion Network stations during the Ms=6.6 Northridge, California earthquake of January 17, 1994 , 1994 .

[15]  Jonathan D. Bray,et al.  Engineering implications of ground motions from the Northridge earthquake , 1996, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[16]  S. P. Jarpe,et al.  Ground-motion variability at the Highway 14 and I-5 interchange in the northern San Fernando Valley , 1996 .

[17]  Kojiro Irikura,et al.  Basin Structure Effects on Long-Period Strong Motions in the San Fernando Valley and the Los Angeles Basin from the 1994 Northridge Earthquake and an Aftershock , 1996 .

[18]  Douglas S. Dreger,et al.  Broadband modeling of local earthquakes , 1990 .

[19]  Paul Bodin,et al.  Dynamic deformations of shallow sediments in the Valley of Mexico, Part I: Three-dimensional strains and rotations recorded on a seismic array , 1997, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.