Can sinusoidal vernier acuity be predicted by contrast discrimination?

A test-pedestal approach, with a test grating superimposed on a masking pedestal, was used to compare sinusoidal grating vernier acuity and contrast discrimination thresholds. The goal is to develop a simple model for vernier acuity without assumptions about underlying mechanisms. In the contrast discrimination task, subjects were asked to detect contrast increments in the presence of a base pedestal. In the vernier task, a test grating shifted by 90 deg relative to the pedestal grating was added to one-half of the pedestal grating to produce a vernier offset. When expressed in the same contrast units and compared under optimal conditions, vernier and contrast discrimination thresholds agree well at spatial frequencies between 2 and 20 c/deg and at pedestal contrasts above 10 times detection threshold. Thus, under these conditions, contrast discrimination predicts grating vernier acuity. To account for the discrepancies between vernier thresholds and contrast just noticeable difference (JND) when conditions deviate from optimal, one needs to make assumptions about the underlying mechanisms.

[1]  J Nachmias,et al.  Letter: Grating contrast: discrimination may be better than detection. , 1974, Vision research.

[2]  Hugh R. Wilson,et al.  Responses of spatial mechanisms can explain hyperacuity , 1986, Vision Research.

[3]  J. M. FINDLAY.  Feature Detectors and Vernier Acuity , 1973, Nature.

[4]  S. F. Bowne.  Contrast discrimination cannot explain spatial frequency, orientation or temporal frequency discrimination , 1990, Vision Research.

[5]  R. Watt,et al.  Spatial filters and the localization of luminance changes in human vision , 1984, Vision Research.

[6]  D. Whitaker.  What part of a vernier stimulus determines performance? , 1993, Vision Research.

[7]  M. C. Lawden,et al.  An investigation of the ability of the human visual system to encode spatial phase relationships , 1983, Vision Research.

[8]  S. Klein,et al.  The Psychophysics of Detection. Review of Visual Pattern Analyzers, by N. V. S. Graham. , 1993 .

[9]  S. Klein,et al.  The role of local contrast in the visual deficits of humans with naturally occurring amblyopia , 1992, Neuroscience Letters.

[10]  J. Kulikowski,et al.  Effective contrast constancy and linearity of contrast sensation , 1976, Vision Research.

[11]  R. W. Klopfenstein,et al.  Spatial-Frequency Model for Hyperacuity , 1985 .

[12]  D. Regan,et al.  Postadaptation orientation discrimination. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[13]  D M Levi,et al.  Differences in vernier discrimination for grating between strabismic and anisometropic amblyopes. , 1982, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[14]  H. Wilson,et al.  Modified line-element theory for spatial-frequency and width discrimination. , 1984, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[15]  J. Robson,et al.  Application of fourier analysis to the visibility of gratings , 1968, The Journal of physiology.

[16]  S. Klein,et al.  Position sense of the peripheral retina. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[17]  M. Georgeson,et al.  Contrast constancy: deblurring in human vision by spatial frequency channels. , 1975, The Journal of physiology.

[18]  Journal of the Optical Society of America , 1950, Nature.

[19]  S. Klein,et al.  Spatial frequency channels in human vision as asymmetric (edge) mechanisms. , 1974, Vision research.

[20]  M J Morgan,et al.  Vernier acuity predicted from changes in the light distribution of the retinal image. , 1985, Spatial vision.

[21]  Bart Farell,et al.  Vernier acuity: Effects of chromatic content, blur and contrast , 1991, Vision Research.

[22]  S. Klein,et al.  Hyperacuity thresholds of 1 sec: theoretical predictions and empirical validation. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[23]  A Bradley,et al.  Contrast dependence and mechanisms of masking interactions among chromatic and luminance gratings. , 1988, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[24]  D. Levi,et al.  Orientation, masking, and vernier acuity for line targets , 1993, Vision Research.

[25]  S. Klein,et al.  Opponent-movement mechanisms in human vision. , 1984, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[26]  B. Skottun,et al.  Effects of contrast and spatial frequency on vernier acuity , 1987, Vision Research.

[27]  N. Graham.  Visual Pattern Analyzers , 1989 .

[28]  J. M. Foley,et al.  Contrast masking in human vision. , 1980, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[29]  G Stigmar,et al.  BLURRED VISUAL STIMULI , 1971 .

[30]  D G Pelli,et al.  Uncertainty explains many aspects of visual contrast detection and discrimination. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[31]  M. Banks,et al.  The effects of contrast, spatial scale, and orientation on foveal and peripheral phase discrimination , 1991, Vision Research.

[32]  W. Geisler,et al.  Ideal discriminators in spatial vision: two-point stimuli. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[33]  D. G. Green,et al.  Optical and retinal factors affecting visual resolution. , 1965, The Journal of physiology.

[34]  Stanley A. Klein.  Spatial vision models: problems and successes , 1994 .

[35]  D. P. Andrews,et al.  Acuities for spatial arrangement in line figures: human and ideal observers compared. , 1973, Vision research.

[36]  D. Field,et al.  Phase reversal discrimination , 1984, Vision Research.