In vitro comparison of different carotid artery stents: a pixel-by-pixel analysis using CT angiography and contrast-enhanced MR angiography at 1.5 and 3 T

[1]  G. Schroth,et al.  The use of flat panel angioCT (DynaCT) for navigation through a deformed and fractured carotid stent , 2010, Neuroradiology.

[2]  T. Iwama,et al.  Follow-up study on in-stent thrombosis after carotid stenting using multidetector CT angiography , 2009, Neuroradiology.

[3]  I. Grunwald,et al.  Lesion load in unprotected carotid artery stenting , 2009, Neuroradiology.

[4]  W. Hacke,et al.  Results of the Stent-Protected Angioplasty versus Carotid Endarterectomy (SPACE) study to treat symptomatic stenoses at 2 years: a multinational, prospective, randomised trial , 2008, The Lancet Neurology.

[5]  C. Romanowski,et al.  Complications of cerebral angiography: a prospective analysis of 2,924 consecutive procedures , 2007, Neuroradiology.

[6]  M. Hartmann,et al.  3.0 Tesla contrast-enhanced MR angiography of carotid artery stents: in vitro measurements as compared with 1.5 Tesla. , 2006, Journal of neuroradiology. Journal de neuroradiologie.

[7]  C. Claussen,et al.  Evaluation of various image reconstruction parameters in lower extremity stents using multidetector-row CT angiography: initial findings , 2006, European Radiology.

[8]  Rainer Raupach,et al.  64-slice multidetector coronary CT angiography: in vitro evaluation of 68 different stents , 2006, European Radiology.

[9]  W. Heindel,et al.  3.0 T vs. 1.5 T MR angiography: In vitro comparison of intravascular stent artifacts , 2005, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[10]  O. Jansen,et al.  MRT bei Karotisstents: Einfluss von Stenteigenschaften und Geräteparametern auf die Darstellbarkeit des Karotislumens , 2005 .

[11]  M. Deli,et al.  [MRI of carotid stents: influence of stent properties and sequence parameters on visualization of the carotid artery lumen]. , 2005, RoFo : Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin.

[12]  W. Heindel,et al.  3.0 Tesla Magnetic Resonance Angiography of Endovascular Aortic Stent Grafts: Phantom Measurements in Comparison With 1.5 Tesla , 2004, Investigative radiology.

[13]  F. Schick,et al.  [Systematics of imaging artifacts in MRT caused by metallic vascular implants (stents)]. , 2003, RoFo : Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin.

[14]  M. Hartmann,et al.  Small-vessel stents for intracranial angioplasty: in vitro comparison of different stent designs and sizes by using CT angiography. , 2003, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[15]  C. Yen,et al.  Quantitative evaluation of susceptibility and shielding effects of nitinol, platinum, cobalt‐alloy, and stainless steel stents , 2003, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[16]  W. Heindel,et al.  Revealing in-stent stenoses of the iliac arteries: comparison of multidetector CT with MR angiography and digital radiographic angiography in a Phantom model. , 2002, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[17]  R. Günther,et al.  Artifact-Free In-Stent Lumen Visualization by Standard Magnetic Resonance Angiography Using a New Metallic Magnetic Resonance Imaging Stent , 2002, Circulation.

[18]  Max A Viergever,et al.  Improved lumen visualization in metallic vascular implants by reducing RF artifacts , 2002, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[19]  Andreas Anayiotos,et al.  Comparative MRI compatibility of 316 L stainless steel alloy and nickel-titanium alloy stents. , 2002, Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

[20]  M. Völk,et al.  Appearance of Vascular Stents in Computed Tomographic Angiography: In Vitro Examination of 14 Different Stent Types , 2001, Investigative radiology.

[21]  E. Spuentrup,et al.  Improved In-Stent Magnetic Resonance Angiography with High Flip Angle Excitation , 2001, Investigative radiology.

[22]  M. Viergever,et al.  MR imaging of vascular stents: effects of susceptibility, flow, and radiofrequency eddy currents. , 2001, Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR.

[23]  W. Nitz,et al.  Stent appearance at contrast-enhanced MR angiography: in vitro examination with 14 stents. , 2000, Radiology.

[24]  T Klemm,et al.  MR imaging in the presence of vascular stents: A systematic assessment of artifacts for various stent orientations, sequence types, and field strengths , 2000, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[25]  M. Koltzenburg,et al.  Silent embolism in diagnostic cerebral angiography and neurointerventional procedures: a prospective study , 1999, The Lancet.

[26]  Y. Amano,et al.  Metallic artifacts of coronary and iliac arteries stents in MR angiography and contrast-enhanced CT. , 1999, Clinical imaging.

[27]  A. Alexandrov,et al.  The clinical value of methods to measure carotid stenosis. , 1996, International angiology : a journal of the International Union of Angiology.

[28]  J. Schenck.  The role of magnetic susceptibility in magnetic resonance imaging: MRI magnetic compatibility of the first and second kinds. , 1996, Medical physics.

[29]  M. Prince.  Gadolinium-enhanced MR aortography. , 1990, Radiology.

[30]  M. Moerland,et al.  Simulation of susceptibility artifacts in 2D and 3D Fourier transform spin-echo and gradient-echo magnetic resonance imaging. , 1994, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[31]  D Saloner,et al.  Artifacts in maximum-intensity-projection display of MR angiograms. , 1990, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.