Initial Public Offering Investor Valuations: An Examination of Top Management Team Prestige and Environmental Uncertainty

Relying on one of the more notable entrepreneurial settings, an initial public offering (IPO), this article extends prior work on top management team (TMT) characteristics. We examine whether or not prestigious TMTs at the time of an IPO enhance organizational legitimacy and thereby provide a signal to potential investors. Because an IPO represents an entrepreneurial context characterized by high levels of uncertainty, we also consider the impact of environmental uncertainty on the TMT prestige/investor valuation relationship. We find that both an element of TMT prestige and environmental uncertainty influence investor valuations. However, we also find that the influence of prestige does not assuage investors when analyzing IPOs in different environmental conditions.

[1]  M. Spence.  Job Market Signaling , 1973 .

[2]  W. Powell,et al.  The iron cage revisited institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields , 1983 .

[3]  Barbara W. Keats,et al.  A Causal Model of Linkages Among Environmental Dimensions, Macro Organizational Characteristics, and Performance , 1988 .

[4]  Edward J. Zajac,et al.  Managerial Incentives, Monitoring, and Risk Bearing: A Study of Executive Compensation, Ownership, and Board Structure in Initial Public Offerings , 1994 .

[5]  Dan R. Dalton,et al.  Wealth and the effects of founder management among IPO‐stage new ventures , 2001 .

[6]  Sten Jönsson.  Institutions and Organizations , 1997 .

[7]  Gregory G. Dess,et al.  Industry Effects and Strategic Management Research , 1990 .

[8]  Timothy G. Pollock,et al.  Media Legitimation Effects in the Market for Initial Public Offerings , 2003 .

[9]  Masoud Yasai-Ardekani,et al.  Effects of Environmental Scarcity and Munificence on the Relationship of Context to Organizational Structure , 1989 .

[10]  Joel Podolny.  A Status-Based Model of Market Competition , 1993, American Journal of Sociology.

[11]  Frances J. Milliken.  Three Types of Perceived Uncertainty About the Environment: State, Effect, and Response Uncertainty , 1987 .

[12]  Joseph Berger,et al.  STATUS ORGANIZING PROCESSES , 1980 .

[13]  W. Mikkelson,et al.  Ownership and operating performance of companies that go public , 1997 .

[14]  M. Zimmerman,et al.  Beyond Survival: Achieving New Venture Growth by Building Legitimacy , 2002 .

[15]  J. Child.  Organizational Structure, Environment and Performance: The Role of Strategic Choice , 1972 .

[16]  M. Wiersema,et al.  Top management team turnover as an adaptation mechanism: The role of the environment , 1993 .

[17]  Gregory G. Dess,et al.  Dimensions of Organizational Task Environments. , 1984 .

[18]  Brian K. Boyd,et al.  Corporate linkages and organizational environment: A test of the resource dependence model , 1990 .

[19]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  Organizational Growth: Linking Founding Team, Strategy, Environment, and Growth among U.S. Semiconductor Ventures, 1978-1988. , 1990 .

[20]  J. Ritter.  The Long-Run Performance of Initial Public Offerings , 1991 .

[21]  William L. Megginson,et al.  Venture Capitalist Certification in Initial Public Offerings , 1991 .

[22]  Howard E. Aldrich.  Organizations and Environments , 1979 .

[23]  Benjamin M. Oviatt,et al.  How New Ventures Exploit Trade-Offs Among International Risk Factors: Lessons For The Accelerated Internationization Of The 21St Century , 2000 .

[24]  Marc J. Dollinger,et al.  Interorganizational and Collective Strategies in Small Firms: Environmental Effects and Performance , 1992 .

[25]  Henry L. Tosi,et al.  On the Measurement of the Environment: An Assessment of the Lawrence and Lorsch Environmental Uncertainty Subscale , 1973 .

[26]  Teresa Nelson,et al.  The persistence of founder influence: management, ownership, and performance effects at initial public offering , 2003 .

[27]  Ashutosh Kumar Singh,et al.  Underwriter Reputation, Initial Returns, and the Long‐Run Performance of IPO Stocks , 1998 .

[28]  W. Scott,et al.  A Multidimensional Model of Organizational Legitimacy: Hospital Survival in Changing Institutional Environments , 1998 .

[29]  J. Pfeffer,et al.  Organizational Legitimacy , 1975 .

[30]  Gregory G. Dess,et al.  Divergence between Archival and Perceptual Measures of the Environment: Causes and Consequences , 1993 .

[31]  Ronald S. Burt,et al.  Interorganization Contagion in Corporate Philanthropy , 1991 .

[32]  R. Rumelt.  How much does industry matter , 1991 .

[33]  Cultures of success , 1998 .

[34]  Charles C. Snow,et al.  Organization-Environment: Concepts and Issues , 1974 .

[35]  Richard A. D'Aveni.  Top Managerial Prestige and Organizational Bankruptcy , 1990 .

[36]  J. Seeger,et al.  Entrepreneurial Teams in New Venture Creation: A Research Agenda , 1990 .

[37]  M. Mizruchi.  What Do Interlocks Do? An Analysis, Critique, and Assessment of Research on Interlocking Directorates , 1996 .

[38]  G. Milkovich,et al.  Relationships Among Risk, Incentive Pay, and Organizational Performance , 1998 .

[39]  Roni Michaely,et al.  Does the Choice of Auditor Convey Quality in an Initial Public Offering , 1995 .

[40]  R. Z. Norman,et al.  Status inconsistency in task situations: A test of four status processing principles. , 1992 .

[41]  H. P. Sims,et al.  Top Management Team Demography and Process: The Role of Social Integration and Communication , 1994 .

[42]  D. Hambrick,et al.  Upper Echelons: The Organization as a Reflection of Its Top Managers , 1984 .

[43]  Henry Mintzberg,et al.  The structuring of organizations : a synthesis of the research , 1980 .

[44]  K. Sutcliffe.  What Executives Notice: Accurate Perceptions in Top Management Teams , 1994 .

[45]  L. Donaldson.  Strategic Leadership: Top Executives and Their Effects on Organizations , 1997 .

[46]  C. Oliver.  Determinants of Interorganizational Relationships: Integration and Future Directions , 1990 .

[47]  N. K. Muir,et al.  Three Components of Perceived Environmental Uncertainty: An Exploratory Analysis of the Effects of Aggregation , 1991 .

[48]  Mason A. Carpenter,et al.  Top Management Teams, Global Strategic Posture, and the Moderating Role of Uncertainty , 2001 .

[49]  Roger G. Ibbotson,et al.  INITIAL PUBLIC OFFERINGS , 1988 .

[50]  S. Trevis Certo,et al.  Influencing Initial Public Offering Investors with Prestige: Signaling with Board Structures , 2003 .

[51]  G. Becker,et al.  Human Capital: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis with Special Reference to Education, Third Edition , 1993 .

[52]  Theresa M. Welbourne,et al.  Predicting the Performance of Initial Public Offerings: Should Human Resource Management be in the Equation? , 1996 .

[53]  M. Wiersema,et al.  Top Management Team Demography and Corporate Strategic Change , 1992 .

[54]  Richard A. D'Aveni,et al.  Top team deterioration as part of the downward spiral of large corporate bankruptcies , 1992 .

[55]  A. Rasheed,et al.  Rational decision‐making and firm performance: the moderating role of the environment , 1997 .

[56]  Robert J. Pearce,et al.  TOWARD UNDERSTANDING JOINT VENTURE PERFORMANCE AND SURVIVAL: A BARGAINING AND INFLUENCE APPROACH TO TRANSACTION COST THEORY , 1997 .

[57]  Pamela R. Haunschild,et al.  Modes of Interorganizational Imitation: The Effects of Outcome Salience and Uncertainty , 1997 .

[58]  Ranjay Gulati,et al.  Getting Off to a Good Start: The Effects of Upper Echelon Affiliations on Underwriter Prestige , 2003, Organ. Sci..

[59]  Howard E. Aldrich,et al.  Fools Rush in? The Institutional Context of Industry Creation , 1994 .

[60]  Jeffrey Pfeffer,et al.  The Effect of Uncertainty on the Use of Social Influence in Organizational Decision Making. , 1976 .

[61]  Jay R. Galbraith.  Designing Complex Organizations , 1973 .

[62]  S. Chatterjee,et al.  Regression Analysis by Example (2nd ed.). , 1992 .

[63]  Toby E. Stuart,et al.  Interorganizational Endorsements and the Performance of Entrepreneurial Ventures , 1999 .

[64]  John W. Meyer,et al.  Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony , 1977, American Journal of Sociology.

[65]  Robert N. Stern,et al.  The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. , 1979 .

[66]  P. Lawrence,et al.  Organization and Environment: Managing Differentiation and Integration , 1967 .

[67]  Albert A. Cannella,et al.  Giving Money to Get Money: How CEO Stock Options and CEO Equity Enhance IPO Valuations , 2003 .

[68]  L. Festinger.  A Theory of Social Comparison Processes , 1954 .

[69]  Lowell W. Busenitz,et al.  New venture teams' assessment of learning assistance from venture capital firms , 1996 .

[70]  S. Jackson,et al.  Top management and innovations in banking: Does the composition of the top team make a difference? , 1989 .

[71]  Terri L. Moore,et al.  Regression Analysis by Example , 2001, Technometrics.

[72]  A. Stinchcombe.  Social Structure and Organizations , 2000, Political Organizations.

[73]  Oliver E. Williamson,et al.  A Dynamic Theory of Interfirm Behavior , 1965 .

[74]  Brian K. Boyd,et al.  CEO DUALITY AND FIRM PERFORMANCE: A CONTINGENCY MODEL , 1995 .

[75]  Bharat A. Jain,et al.  Does the Presence of Venture Capitalists Improve the Survival Profile of IPO Firms , 2000 .

[76]  Gary J. Castrogiovanni,et al.  Environmental Munihcence; A Theoretical Assessment , 1991 .

[77]  A. Hargadon.  Organizations in Action:Social Science Bases of Administrative Theory (Book) , 2003 .

[78]  Mark C. Suchman.  Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches , 1995 .

[79]  Allen C. Amason,et al.  Understanding the dynamics of new venture top management teams: cohesion, conflict, and new venture performance , 2002 .

[80]  Charles W. Hofer,et al.  Improving New Venture Performance: The Role of Strategy, Industry Structure, and the Entrepreneur , 1987 .

[81]  David L. Deeds,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES AND NEW PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT IN HIGH TECHNOLOGY VENTURES: AN EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS OF NEW BIOTECHNOLOGY FIRMS , 2000 .

[82]  Richard A. D'Aveni,et al.  Top Managerial Prestige, Power and Tender Offer Response: A Study of Elite Social Networks and Target Firm Cooperation during Takeovers , 1993 .

[83]  J. Ravetz.  Sociology of Science , 1972, Nature.

[84]  Gregory G. Dess,et al.  The Congruence Perspective of Organization Design: A Conceptual Model and Multivariate Research Approach , 1984 .

[85]  Mingfang Li,et al.  The moderating effect of environmental dynamism on the ownership and performance relationship , 1998 .

[86]  O. C. Herfindahl.  Concentration in the steel industry , 1950 .

[87]  P. Khandwalla.  Effect of Competition on the Structure of Top Management Control , 1973 .

[88]  Barry M. Staw,et al.  The scarcity-munificence component of organizational environments and the commission of illegal acts / 230 , 1975 .

[89]  John W. Meyer.  Institutional and technical sources of organizational structure explaining the structure of educational organizations , 1980 .

[90]  Allen C. Bluedorn.  Pilgrim’s Progress: Trends and Convergence in Research on Organizational Size and Environments , 1993 .

[91]  Steven Manaster,et al.  Initial Public Offerings and Underwriter Reputation , 1990 .

[92]  Mark P. Sharfman,et al.  Conceptualizing and Measuring the Organizational Environment: A Multidimensional Approach , 1991 .

[93]  Blake E. Ashforth,et al.  The Double-Edge of Organizational Legitimation , 1990 .

[94]  J. Goodstein.  Institutional Pressures and Strategic Responsiveness: Employer Involvement in Work-Family Issues , 1994 .

[95]  C. Prahalad,et al.  The dominant logic: A new linkage between diversity and performance , 1986 .

[96]  Paul A. Gompers,et al.  An analysis of compensation in the U.S. venture capital partnership 1 Helpful comments were provided , 1999 .