Policy borrowing, policy learning: testing times in Australian schooling

This paper provides a contextualised and critical policy analysis of the Rudd government's national schooling agenda in Australia. The specific focus is on the introduction of national literacy and numeracy testing and the recent creation by the Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority of the website ‘My School’, which lists the results of these tests for all Australian schools, including school performance against averages and against the performance of 60 other socio-economically ‘like-schools’ across the nation. It is argued that we are seeing the emergence of a national system of schooling (including national curriculum) as part of the reconstitution of the nation in the face of globalization and related economisation of education policy. This is the case despite Australia's federal political structure with the States holding the ostensible Constitutional responsibility for schooling. The analysis locates these and associated developments (a national schooling policy ensemble) within considerations of new accountabilities, the restructured state, neo-liberalism, globalized education policy discourses and policy borrowing and learning. The analysis also suggests that, despite the Prime Minister's swingeing critique of neo-liberalism in the context of the global financial crisis and enhanced state intervention in the economy, this national schooling agenda (the government's so-called ‘education revolution’), is a hybrid mix of the neo-liberal with social democratic aspirations to do with social justice and schooling.

[1]  S. Ball,et al.  The Education Debate , 2021 .

[2]  A. Luke Documenting Reproduction and Inequality: Revisiting Jean Anyon’s “Social Class and School Knowledge” , 2010 .

[3]  Ian Menter,et al.  Children, their world, their education: final report and recommendations of the Cambridge Primary Review , 2009 .

[4]  F. Rizvi,et al.  Globalizing Education Policy , 2009 .

[5]  P. Taubman,et al.  Teaching by Numbers: Deconstructing the Discourse of Standards and Accountability in Education , 2009 .

[6]  J. Ozga Governing education through data in England: from regulation to self‐evaluation , 2009 .

[7]  Kevin Rudd The Global Financial Crisis , 2009 .

[8]  Larry Cuban,et al.  Hugging the Middle―How Teachers Teach in an Era of Testing and Accountability , 2009 .

[9]  I. Menter Teachers for the future: what have we got and what do we need? , 2009 .

[10]  John Hattie Visible Learning: A Synthesis of Over 800 Meta-Analyses Relating to Achievement , 2008 .

[11]  Wayne Au,et al.  Unequal by Design: High-Stakes Testing and the Standardization of Inequality , 2008 .

[12]  Gordon Stobart,et al.  Testing Times: The Uses and Abuses of Assessment , 2008 .

[13]  Brian Head,et al.  Three lenses of evidence-based policy , 2008 .

[14]  David Hursh High-Stakes Testing and the Decline of Teaching and Learning: The Real Crisis in Education. Critical Education Policy and Politics #1. , 2008 .

[15]  Kalervo N. Gulson,et al.  ‘Neoliberal spatial technologies’: on the practices of educational policy change , 2007 .

[16]  Pasi Sahlberg,et al.  Education policies for raising student learning: the Finnish approach , 2007 .

[17]  J. Janmaat,et al.  Education, equality and social cohesion: a comparative analysis , 2006 .

[18]  S. Ball Education Policy and Social Class: The Selected Works of Stephen J. Ball , 2005 .

[19]  Hannu Simola,et al.  The Finnish miracle of PISA: historical and sociological remarks on teaching and teacher education , 2005 .

[20]  P. Lipman High Stakes Education: Inequality, Globalization, and Urban School Reform , 2003 .

[21]  Anto´Nio No´Voa,et al.  Comparative Research in Education: a mode of governance or a historical journey? , 2003 .

[22]  Charles Taylor Modern Social Imaginaries , 2002 .

[23]  D. McCaffrey,et al.  Toward a Framework for Validating Gains under High-Stakes Conditions. CSE Technical Report. , 2001 .

[24]  Tony Townsend,et al.  Satan or Saviour? An Analysis of Two Decades of School Effectiveness Research , 2001 .

[25]  John Clarke,et al.  New Managerialism, New Welfare? , 2000 .

[26]  D. Phillips Learning from Elsewhere in Education: Some perennial problems revisited with reference to British interest in Germany , 2000 .

[27]  D. Gillborn,et al.  Rationing Education: Policy, Practice, Reform and Equity , 1999 .

[28]  A. Desrosières,et al.  The Politics of Large Numbers: A History of Statistical Reasoning , 1999 .

[29]  A. Lafond,et al.  Trust in Numbers , 1995 .

[30]  B. Lingard,et al.  Globalization and the rescaling of education politics and policy : implications for comparative education. , 2010 .

[31]  B. Lingard,et al.  Rescaling and reconstituting education policy: The knowledge economy and the scalar politics of global fields , 2009 .

[32]  G. Masters A Shared Challenge: Improving Literacy, Numeracy and Science Learning in Queensland Primary Schools , 2009 .

[33]  Linda Darling-Hammond,et al.  The Flat World and Education: How America's Commitment to Equity Will Determine Our Future , 2009 .

[34]  Thomas S. Popkewitz,et al.  The global politics of educational borrowing and lending , 2004 .

[35]  D. Chant,et al.  The Queensland School Reform Longitudinal Study , 2001 .

[36]  J. Gore,et al.  The Queensland School Reform Longitudinal Study: A Strategy for Shared Curriculum Leadership. Teachers' Manual , 2001 .

[37]  B. Lingard Federalism in schooling since the Karmel Report (1973),Schools in Australia: From modernist hope to postmodernist performativity , 2000 .

[38]  J. Clapp,et al.  Development as Freedom , 1999 .

[39]  Jean-François Lyotard,et al.  The Postmodern Condition , 1979 .