The Cognitive and Neural Development of Face Recognition in Humans

Conventional wisdom has long held that face recognition develops very slowly throughout infancy, childhood, and adolescence, with perceptual experience as the primary engine of this development. However, striking new findings from just the last few years have overturned much of this traditional view by demonstrating genetic influences on the face recognition system as well as impressive face discrimination abilities present in newborns and in monkeys who were reared without ever seeing a face. Nevertheless, experience does play a role, for example in narrowing the range of facial subtypes for which discrimination is possible and perhaps also increasing discrimination abilities within that range. Here we first describe the cognitive and neural characteristics of the adult system for face recognition, and then we chart the development of this system over infancy and childhood. This review identifies a fascinating new puzzle to be targeted in future research: all qualitative aspects of adult face recognition measured behaviorally are present very early in development (by 4 yrs of age; all that have been tested are also present in infancy) – yet fMRI and ERP evidence shows very late maturity of face-selective neural responses (with the fusiform face area increasing substantially in volume between age 7 and adulthood).

[1]  C. C. Goren,et al.  Visual following and pattern discrimination of face-like stimuli by newborn infants. , 1975, Pediatrics.

[2]  S. Carey,et al.  From piecemeal to configurational representation of faces. , 1977, Science.

[3]  H. Ellis,et al.  Identification of Familiar and Unfamiliar Faces from Internal and External Features: Some Implications for Theories of Face Recognition , 1979, Perception.

[4]  S. Carey,et al.  Development of face recognition: A maturational component? , 1980 .

[5]  R. Desimone,et al.  Stimulus-selective properties of inferior temporal neurons in the macaque , 1984, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[6]  V. Bruce,et al.  The Effects of Distinctiveness in Recognising and Classifying Faces , 1986, Perception.

[7]  A. Young,et al.  Configurational Information in Face Perception , 1987, Perception.

[8]  A. Baddeley,et al.  Face recognition, pose and ecological validity. , 1987 .

[9]  A. J. Mistlin,et al.  Specialized face processing and hemispheric asymmetry in man and monkey: Evidence from single unit and reaction time studies , 1988, Behavioural Brain Research.

[10]  T. Valentine The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A: Human Experimental Psychology a Unified Account of the Effects of Distinctiveness, Inversion, and Race in Face Recognition , 2022 .

[11]  Mark H. Johnson,et al.  Newborns' preferential tracking of face-like stimuli and its subsequent decline , 1991, Cognition.

[12]  Mark H. Johnson,et al.  CONSPEC and CONLERN: a two-process theory of infant face recognition. , 1991, Psychological review.

[13]  M. Farah,et al.  Parts and Wholes in Face Recognition , 1993, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[14]  C. Gross,et al.  Response properties of neurons in temporal cortical visual areas of infant monkeys. , 1993, Journal of neurophysiology.

[15]  G. Rhodes,et al.  What's lost in inverted faces? , 1993, Cognition.

[16]  H. Ellis,et al.  Age Effects in the Processing of Typical and Distinctive Faces , 1995, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[17]  Olivier Pascalis,et al.  Mother's face recognition by neonates: A replication and an extension , 1995 .

[18]  T. Allison,et al.  Electrophysiological Studies of Face Perception in Humans , 1996, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[19]  T. Allison,et al.  Differential Sensitivity of Human Visual Cortex to Faces, Letterstrings, and Textures: A Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study , 1996, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[20]  J. Tanaka,et al.  Features and their configuration in face recognition , 1997, Memory & cognition.

[21]  P. Goldman-Rakic,et al.  Infrequent events transiently activate human prefrontal and parietal cortex as measured by functional MRI. , 1997, Journal of neurophysiology.

[22]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  The Fusiform Face Area: A Module in Human Extrastriate Cortex Specialized for Face Perception , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[23]  Nancy Kanwisher,et al.  A cortical representation of the local visual environment , 1998, Nature.

[24]  D. Simons,et al.  Failure to detect changes to people during a real-world interaction , 1998 .

[25]  James W. Tanaka,et al.  Face recognition in young children : When the whole is greater than the sum of its parts , 1998 .

[26]  O. Pascalis,et al.  Long-term recognition memory for faces assessed by visual paired comparison in 3- and 6-month-old infants. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[27]  V. Bruce,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article FACE RECOGNITION IN POOR-QUALITY VIDEO: Evidence From Security Surveillance , 2022 .

[28]  Otto H. MacLin,et al.  Figural aftereffects in the perception of faces , 1999, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[29]  E. Halgren,et al.  Cognitive response profile of the human fusiform face area as determined by MEG. , 2000, Cerebral cortex.

[30]  Bruno Rossion,et al.  Hemispheric Asymmetries for Whole-Based and Part-Based Face Processing in the Human Fusiform Gyrus , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[31]  Alan Slater,et al.  The role of facial orientation in newborn infants’ preference for attractive faces , 2000 .

[32]  A. O'Toole,et al.  Prototype-referenced shape encoding revealed by high-level aftereffects , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[33]  J. Brigham,et al.  Thirty years of investigating the own-race bias in memory for faces: A meta-analytic review , 2001 .

[34]  V. Bruce,et al.  Matching identities of familiar and unfamiliar faces caught on CCTV images. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[35]  I. Bushnell,et al.  Mother's face recognition in newborn infants: learning and memory , 2001 .

[36]  R. A. Haaf,et al.  Stimulus Properties, Attentional Limitations, and Young Children's Face Recognition , 2001, Perceptual and motor skills.

[37]  David I. Perrett,et al.  Recognition of individual faces and average face prototypes by 1- and 3-month-old infants , 2001 .

[38]  Leslie B. Cohen,et al.  Do 7-month-old infants process independent features or facial configurations? , 2001 .

[39]  B. Mazoyer,et al.  RAPID COMMUNICATION Neural Correlates of Woman Face Processing by 2-Month-Old Infants , 2002 .

[40]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  Stages of processing in face perception: an MEG study , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[41]  D. Maurer,et al.  Configural Face Processing Develops more Slowly than Featural Face Processing , 2002, Perception.

[42]  D. Maurer,et al.  The effect of early visual deprivation on the development of face processing , 2002 .

[43]  P. Kuhl,et al.  Foreign-language experience in infancy: Effects of short-term exposure and social interaction on phonetic learning , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[44]  Rachel A Robbins,et al.  Can holistic processing be learned for inverted faces? , 2003, Cognition.

[45]  Patrik Vuilleumier,et al.  Effects of Low-Spatial Frequency Components of Fearful Faces on Fusiform Cortex Activity , 2003, Current Biology.

[46]  Doris Y. Tsao,et al.  Faces and objects in macaque cerebral cortex , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[47]  F. Simion,et al.  Non-specific perceptual biases at the origins of face processing , 2003 .

[48]  Andrea Weidenfeld,et al.  An evaluation of two commonly used tests of unfamiliar face recognition , 2003, Neuropsychologia.

[49]  E. McKone,et al.  Early maturity of face processing in children: Local and relational distinctiveness effects in 7-year-olds , 2003 .

[50]  Mark H. Johnson,et al.  Cortical specialisation for face processing: face-sensitive event-related potential components in 3- and 12-month-old infants , 2003, NeuroImage.

[51]  Research report P erceptual dominance of oriented faces mirrors the distribution of orientation tunings in inferotemporal neurons , 2003 .

[52]  B. Gelder,et al.  Face processing in adolescents with autistic disorder: The inversion and composite effects , 2003, Brain and Cognition.

[53]  D. Maurer,et al.  Expert face processing requires visual input to the right hemisphere during infancy , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[54]  D. Maurer,et al.  Impairment in Holistic Face Processing Following Early Visual Deprivation , 2004, Psychological science.

[55]  Margot J. Taylor,et al.  The Faces of Development: A Review of Early Face Processing over Childhood , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[56]  D. Perrett,et al.  Rapid serial visual presentation for the determination of neural selectivity in area STSa. , 2004, Progress in brain research.

[57]  S. de Schonen,et al.  Effect of visual experience on face processing: a developmental study of inversion and non-native effects. , 2004, Developmental science.

[58]  J E Joseph,et al.  Developmental shifts in cortical loci for face and object recognition , 2004, Neuroreport.

[59]  A. Treves,et al.  Morphing Marilyn into Maggie dissociates physical and identity face representations in the brain , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[60]  F. Sai,et al.  The role of the mother's voice in developing mother's face preference: Evidence for intermodal perception at birth , 2005 .

[61]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  The Neural Basis of the Behavioral Face-Inversion Effect , 2005, Current Biology.

[62]  C. Gross,et al.  Representations of faces and body parts in macaque temporal cortex: a functional MRI study. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[63]  Catherine J. Mondloch,et al.  Missing sights: consequences for visual cognitive development , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[64]  Gilles Pourtois,et al.  Portraits or People? Distinct Representations of Face Identity in the Human Visual Cortex , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[65]  Andrew N. Meltzoff,et al.  Brain Activation during Face Perception: Evidence of a Developmental Change , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[66]  Mark H Johnson,et al.  The emergence of the social brain network: Evidence from typical and atypical development , 2005, Development and Psychopathology.

[67]  C. Pallier,et al.  Reversibility of the Other-Race Effect in Face Recognition During Childhood , 2005, Psychological science.

[68]  O. Pascalis,et al.  Plasticity of face processing in infancy. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[69]  E. McKone,et al.  Categorical and coordinate relations in faces, or Fechner's law and face space instead? , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[70]  Aaron S. Andalman,et al.  Vision Following Extended Congenital Blindness , 2006, Psychological science.

[71]  C. Jacques,et al.  The Speed of Individual Face Categorization , 2006, Psychological science.

[72]  Bruno Rossion,et al.  Faces are represented holistically in the human occipito-temporal cortex , 2006, NeuroImage.

[73]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Orientation tuning of human face processing estimated by contrast matching in transparency displays , 2006, Vision Research.

[74]  Gillian Rhodes,et al.  Are preschoolers sensitive to configural information in faces? , 2006, Developmental science.

[75]  Elinor McKone,et al.  Sensitivity of 4-year-olds to featural and second-order relational changes in face distinctiveness. , 2006, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[76]  M. Giese,et al.  Norm-based face encoding by single neurons in the monkey inferotemporal cortex , 2006, Nature.

[77]  B. Rossion,et al.  Recovery from adaptation to facial identity is larger for upright than inverted faces in the human occipito-temporal cortex , 2006, Neuropsychologia.

[78]  Galit Yovel,et al.  Specialized Face Perception Mechanisms Extract Both Part and Spacing Information: Evidence from Developmental Prosopagnosia , 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[79]  Nancy Kanwisher,et al.  Divide and conquer: A defense of functional localizers , 2006, NeuroImage.

[80]  Irene Leo,et al.  Newborns' face recognition: role of inner and outer facial features. , 2006, Child development.

[81]  Denise C. Park,et al.  Nature versus Nurture in Ventral Visual Cortex: A Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study of Twins , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[82]  Yumiko Otsuka,et al.  Neural activation to upright and inverted faces in infants measured by near infrared spectroscopy , 2007, NeuroImage.

[83]  Jane E Joseph,et al.  The development of expert face processing: are infants sensitive to normal differences in second-order relational information? , 2007, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[84]  What do children look at in an adult face with which they are personally familiar , 2007 .

[85]  C. Jacques,et al.  The time course of the inversion effect during individual face discrimination. , 2007, Journal of vision.

[86]  Frank Sengpiel,et al.  The critical period , 2007, Current Biology.

[87]  K. Grill-Spector,et al.  Differential development of high-level visual cortex correlates with category-specific recognition memory , 2007, Nature Neuroscience.

[88]  J. Mattingley,et al.  Abnormal fMRI Adaptation to Unfamiliar Faces in a Case of Developmental Prosopamnesia , 2007, Current Biology.

[89]  D. Maurer,et al.  The composite face effect in six-year-old children: Evidence of adult-like holistic face processing , 2007 .

[90]  Lynn C. Robertson,et al.  Functional Plasticity in Ventral Temporal Cortex following Cognitive Rehabilitation of a Congenital Prosopagnosic , 2007, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[91]  Michael J. Bernstein,et al.  The Cross-Category Effect , 2007, Psychological science.

[92]  Rachel A Robbins,et al.  No face-like processing for objects-of-expertise in three behavioural tasks , 2007, Cognition.

[93]  O. Pascalis,et al.  The Other-Race Effect Develops During Infancy , 2007, Psychological science.

[94]  Karl Sperling,et al.  Hereditary Prosopagnosia: the First Case Series , 2007, Cortex.

[95]  S. Langton,et al.  Adaptation effects of highly familiar faces: Immediate and long lasting , 2007, Memory & cognition.

[96]  Flavio M. de Paula,et al.  Developmental differences in the neural bases of the face inversion effect show progressive tuning of face-selective regions to the upright orientation , 2007, NeuroImage.

[97]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  Can generic expertise explain special processing for faces? , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[98]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Family resemblance: Ten family members with prosopagnosia and within-class object agnosia , 2007, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[99]  Beatriz Luna,et al.  Visual category-selectivity for faces, places and objects emerges along different developmental trajectories. , 2007, Developmental science.

[100]  D. Burr,et al.  Abnormal Adaptive Face-Coding Mechanisms in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder , 2007, Current Biology.

[101]  Y. Sugita Face perception in monkeys reared with no exposure to faces , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[102]  E. McKone Configural processing and face viewpoint. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[103]  F. Simion,et al.  Newborns’ face recognition over changes in viewpoint , 2008, Cognition.

[104]  I. Kennerknecht,et al.  Congenital prosopagnosia--a common hereditary cognitive dysfunction in humans. , 2008, Frontiers in bioscience : a journal and virtual library.

[105]  Aftereffects reveal enhanced face-coding plasticity in young children , 2010 .

[106]  P. Mounoud Development of Face Perception , 2011 .