Exploration of Set-Based Design for Reinforced Concrete Structures

To explore the feasibility of improving the delivery process of reinforced concrete, we focus in this paper on reinforcing bars (rebar) used in cast-in-place (CIP) concrete. Specifically, we describe the methodology for set-based design of rebar that we are pursuing in an ongoing research effort. Set-based design makes it possible to maintain feasible solutions for longer in the design process than is otherwise affordable using point-based design. It thereby allows for input from several project participants at the same time and early on, as well as throughout project delivery. Set-based communication helps participants avoid rework and through teamwork develop a more globally satisfactory design solution than would otherwise be the case. To illustrate the methodology, we examine the canonical example of reinforcement at a beam-column joint and study the relationships between those who design the joint and those who fabricate and install it: mainly the structural engineer, the fabricator, and the rebar placer. The set-based approach for concrete design is promising. It warrants further effort in characterizing sets at different levels of abstraction and in articulating what different participants value, both of which are needed for sets to be narrowed effectively and for the process to lead to a solution.

[1]  Marcus Bjelkemyr,et al.  Applicability of Engineering Design Theories on Manufacturing System Design in the Context of Concurrent Engineering , 2004 .

[2]  J. Dixon,et al.  Engineering Design , 2019, Springer Handbook of Mechanical Engineering.

[3]  John R. Dixon,et al.  A review of research in mechanical engineering design. Part II: Representations, analysis, and design for the life cycle , 1989 .

[4]  John R. Dixon,et al.  A review of research in mechanical engineering design. Part I: Descriptive, prescriptive, and computer-based models of design processes , 1989 .

[5]  Haruo Ishikawa,et al.  A new 3D-CAD system for set-based parametric design , 2006 .

[6]  Ian F. C. Smith,et al.  Constraint-Based Support for Collaboration in Design and Construction , 1999 .

[7]  Durward K. Sobek,et al.  Involving suppliers in product development in the United States and Japan: evidence for set-based concurrent engineering , 1996 .

[8]  Iris D. Tommelein,et al.  RESTRUCTURING THE REBAR SUPPLY SYSTEM , 2005 .

[9]  Durward K. Sobek,et al.  Toyota's Principles of Set-Based Concurrent Engineering , 1999 .

[10]  Miroslaw J. Skibniewski,et al.  Implementing a B2B e-Work System to the Approval Process of Rebar Design and Estimation , 2006 .

[11]  Durward K. Sobek,et al.  The Second Toyota Paradox: How Delaying Decisions Can Make Better Cars Faster , 1995 .

[12]  Durward K. Sobek,et al.  Adapting real options to new product development by modeling the second Toyota paradox , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[13]  Glenn Ballard,et al.  Positive Vs. Negative Iteration in Design , 2000 .

[14]  Karl T. Ulrich,et al.  Product Design and Development , 1995 .