Negative Staining and Image Classification – Powerful Tools in Modern Electron Microscopy

Vitrification is the state-of-the-art specimen preparation technique for molecular electron microscopy (EM) and therefore negative staining may appear to be an outdated approach. In this paper we illustrate the specific advantages of negative staining, ensuring that this technique will remain an important tool for the study of biological macromolecules. Due to the higher image contrast, much smaller molecules can be visualized by negative staining. Also, while molecules prepared by vitrification usually adopt random orientations in the amorphous ice layer, negative staining tends to induce preferred orientations of the molecules on the carbon support film. Combining negative staining with image classification techniques makes it possible to work with very heterogeneous molecule populations, which are difficult or even impossible to analyze using vitrified specimens.

[1]  A. Hoenger,et al.  Two-dimensional crystals of Escherichia coli maltoporin and their interaction with the maltose-binding protein. , 1992, Journal of molecular biology.

[2]  J. Brink,et al.  Computer image analysis of two-dimensional crystals of beef heart NADH: ubiquinone oxidoreductase fragments. I. Comparison of crystal structures in various negative stains. , 1989, Ultramicroscopy.

[3]  C. Slaughter,et al.  Formation of Proteasome-PA700 Complexes Directly Correlates with Activation of Peptidase Activity , 1998, Microscopy and Microanalysis.

[4]  D. Stokes.  Faculty Opinions recommendation of Global conformational rearrangements in integrin extracellular domains in outside-in and inside-out signaling. , 2003 .

[5]  R. Craig,et al.  Capturing time-resolved changes in molecular structure by negative staining. , 2003, Journal of structural biology.

[6]  H. Ploegh,et al.  Multiple associated proteins regulate proteasome structure and function. , 2002, Molecular cell.

[7]  M. van Heel.  Angular reconstitution: a posteriori assignment of projection directions for 3D reconstruction. , 1987, Ultramicroscopy.

[8]  A Leith,et al.  SPIDER and WEB: processing and visualization of images in 3D electron microscopy and related fields. , 1996, Journal of structural biology.

[9]  R. A. Corpina,et al.  Structure of the Sec23/24–Sar1 pre-budding complex of the COPII vesicle coat , 2002, Nature.

[10]  W. Baumeister,et al.  Has negative staining still a place in biomacromolecular electron microscopy? , 1992, Ultramicroscopy.

[11]  Y. Fujiyoshi,et al.  A pH induced two‐dimensional crystal of membrane‐bound Na+,K+‐ATPase of dog kidney , 1993, FEBS letters.

[12]  Junichi Takagi,et al.  Global Conformational Rearrangements in Integrin Extracellular Domains in Outside-In and Inside-Out Signaling , 2002, Cell.

[13]  Junichi Takagi,et al.  Structure of integrin α5β1 in complex with fibronectin , 2003, The EMBO journal.

[14]  M. Sawaya,et al.  The crystal structure of the bifunctional primase-helicase of bacteriophage T7. , 2003, Molecular cell.

[15]  T. Walz,et al.  Projection structures of three photosynthetic complexes from Rhodobacter sphaeroides: LH2 at 6 A, LH1 and RC-LH1 at 25 A. , 1998, Journal of molecular biology.

[16]  R. Schekman,et al.  Structure of the Sec23p/24p and Sec13p/31p complexes of COPII , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[17]  M van Heel,et al.  A new generation of the IMAGIC image processing system. , 1996, Journal of structural biology.

[18]  A. Goldberg,et al.  Properties of the hybrid form of the 26S proteasome containing both 19S and PA28 complexes , 2002, The EMBO journal.

[19]  Jun S. Liu,et al.  A Bayesian method for classification of images from electron micrographs. , 2002, Journal of structural biology.

[20]  J. Frank.  Three-Dimensional Electron Microscopy of Macromolecular Assemblies , 2006 .

[21]  J. Dubochet,et al.  Are the light-harvesting I complexes from Rhodospirillum rubrum arranged around the reaction centre in a square geometry? , 1998, Journal of Molecular Biology.

[22]  J. Dubochet,et al.  Cryo-negative staining. , 1998, Micron.

[23]  W. Baumeister,et al.  Electron microscopy and image analysis of the multicatalytic proteinase , 1988, FEBS letters.

[24]  W Chiu,et al.  EMAN: semiautomated software for high-resolution single-particle reconstructions. , 1999, Journal of structural biology.

[25]  J. Dubochet,et al.  Cryo-electron microscopy of viruses , 1984, Nature.

[26]  T. Sun,et al.  Towards the molecular architecture of the asymmetric unit membrane of the mammalian urinary bladder epithelium: a closed "twisted ribbon" structure. , 1995, Journal of molecular biology.

[27]  J. Frank,et al.  Three‐dimensional reconstruction from a single‐exposure, random conical tilt series applied to the 50S ribosomal subunit of Escherichia coli , 1987, Journal of microscopy.

[28]  R. Huber,et al.  Structure of 20S proteasome from yeast at 2.4Å resolution , 1997, Nature.

[29]  Bjoern Sander,et al.  Molecular Architecture of the Multiprotein Splicing Factor SF3b , 2003, Science.

[30]  Marin van Heel,et al.  Structure of α-latrotoxin oligomers reveals that divalent cation-dependent tetramers form membrane pores , 2000, Nature Structural Biology.

[31]  Harold P. Erickson,et al.  2.0 Å Crystal Structure of a Four-Domain Segment of Human Fibronectin Encompassing the RGD Loop and Synergy Region , 1996, Cell.

[32]  Holger Stark,et al.  Arrangement of RNA and proteins in the spliceosomal U1 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein particle , 2001, Nature.

[33]  Thomas Walz,et al.  Structure of the Human Transferrin Receptor-Transferrin Complex , 2004, Cell.

[34]  Thilo Stehle,et al.  Crystal Structure of the Extracellular Segment of Integrin αVβ3 , 2001, Science.