Assorted pixels: multi-sampled imaging with structural models

Multi-sampled imaging is a general framework for using pixels on an image detector to simultaneously sample multiple dimensions of imaging (space, time, spectrum, brightness, polarization, etc.). The mosaic of red, green and blue spectral filters found in most solid-state color cameras is one example of multi-sampled imaging. We briefly describe how multi-sampling can be used to explore other dimensions of imaging. Once such an image is captured, smooth reconstructions along the individual dimensions can be obtained using standard interpolation algorithms. Typically, this results in a substantial reduction of resolution (and hence image quality). One can extract significantly greater resolution in each dimension by noting that the light fields associated with real scenes have enormous redundancies within them, causing different dimensions to be highly correlated. Hence, multi-sampled images can be better interpolated using local structural models that are learned off-line from a diverse set of training images. The specific type of structural models we use are based on polynomial functions of measured image intensities. They are very effective as well as computationally efficient. We demonstrate the benefits of structural interpolation using three specific applications. These are (a) traditional color imaging with a mosaic of color filters, (b) high dynamic range monochrome imaging using a mosaic of exposure filters, and (c) high dynamic range color imaging using a mosaic of overlapping color and exposure filters.

[1]  R. Bracewell The Fourier Transform and Its Applications , 1966 .

[2]  P.L.P. Dillon,et al.  Fabrication and performance of color filter arrays for solid-state imagers , 1978, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices.

[3]  K.A. Parulski Color filters and processing alternatives for one-chip cameras , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices.

[4]  K. Knop,et al.  A new class of mosaic color encoding patterns for single-chip cameras , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices.

[5]  Shree K. Nayar,et al.  Radiometric self calibration , 1999, Proceedings. 1999 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (Cat. No PR00149).

[6]  William T. Freeman,et al.  Learning low-level vision , 1999, Proceedings of the Seventh IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision.

[7]  Takeo Kanade,et al.  Limits on super-resolution and how to break them , 2000, Proceedings IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. CVPR 2000 (Cat. No.PR00662).

[8]  Moshe Ben-Ezra Segmentation with invisible keying signal , 2000, Proceedings IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. CVPR 2000 (Cat. No.PR00662).

[9]  Shree K. Nayar,et al.  High dynamic range imaging: spatially varying pixel exposures , 2000, Proceedings IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. CVPR 2000 (Cat. No.PR00662).

[10]  S. Nayar,et al.  Generalized mosaicing , 2001, Proceedings Eighth IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision. ICCV 2001.