Joint estimation of the basic reproduction number and generation time parameters for infectious disease outbreaks.

The basic reproduction number is a key parameter determining whether an infectious disease will persist. Its counterpart over time, the effective reproduction number, is of value in assessing in real time whether interventions have brought an outbreak under control. In this paper, we use theoretical arguments and simulation to understand the relationship between estimation of the reproduction number based on a full continuous time epidemic model and 2 other recently developed estimators. All these methods make use of "epidemic curve" data and require assumptions about the generation time distribution. The 2 simplest estimators do not require information about the-often difficult to obtain-population size. The simplest estimator is shown to require further assumptions that are rarely valid in practical settings and to produce severely biased estimates compared to the others. Furthermore, we show that in general the parameters of the generation time distribution and the reproduction number are non-identified in the early stages of an incomplete outbreak. On the basis of these results, we recommend that, wherever possible, estimation of the basic and effective reproduction numbers should be based on a well-defined epidemic model; moreover, if external information is available then it should be incorporated in a Bayesian analysis.

[1]  Simon Cauchemez,et al.  The Early Transmission Dynamics of H1N1pdm Influenza in the United Kingdom , 2010, PLoS currents.

[2]  C. Fraser,et al.  Household transmission of 2009 pandemic influenza A (H1N1) virus in the United States. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[3]  M. Lipsitch,et al.  The Severity of Pandemic H1N1 Influenza in the United States, from April to July 2009: A Bayesian Analysis , 2009, PLoS medicine.

[4]  Gail E. Potter,et al.  The Transmissibility and Control of Pandemic Influenza A (H1N1) Virus , 2009, Science.

[5]  E. Lyons,et al.  Pandemic Potential of a Strain of Influenza A (H1N1): Early Findings , 2009, Science.

[6]  Joanna Ellis,et al.  The Early Transmission Dynamics of H1N1pdm Influenza in the United Kingdom. , 2009, PLoS currents.

[7]  L Forsberg White,et al.  A likelihood‐based method for real‐time estimation of the serial interval and reproductive number of an epidemic , 2008, Statistics in medicine.

[8]  Ả. Svensson A note on generation times in epidemic models. , 2007, Mathematical Biosciences.

[9]  A. Ghani,et al.  The Transmissibility of Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza in Commercial Poultry in Industrialised Countries , 2007, PloS one.

[10]  Armin Elbers,et al.  Risk Maps for the Spread of Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza in Poultry , 2007, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[11]  J. Wallinga,et al.  Different Epidemic Curves for Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Reveal Similar Impacts of Control Measures , 2004, American journal of epidemiology.

[12]  C. Fraser,et al.  Transmission Dynamics of the Etiological Agent of SARS in Hong Kong: Impact of Public Health Interventions , 2003, Science.

[13]  J. Robins,et al.  Transmission Dynamics and Control of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome , 2003, Science.

[14]  L. Matthews,et al.  The construction and analysis of epidemic trees with reference to the 2001 UK foot–and–mouth outbreak , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[15]  Christl A. Donnelly,et al.  Transmission intensity and impact of control policies on the foot and mouth epidemic in Great Britain , 2001, Nature.

[16]  G. Roberts,et al.  Bayesian inference for partially observed stochastic epidemics , 1999 .

[17]  Gavin J. Gibson,et al.  Estimating parameters in stochastic compartmental models using Markov chain methods , 1998 .

[18]  P. Kaye Infectious diseases of humans: Dynamics and control , 1993 .

[19]  R. May,et al.  Infectious Diseases of Humans: Dynamics and Control , 1991, Annals of Internal Medicine.