Task- and stimulus-related cortical networks in language production: Exploring similarity of MEG- and fMRI-derived functional connectivity

Large-scale networks support the dynamic integration of information across multiple functionally specialized brain regions. Network analyses of haemodynamic modulations have revealed such functional brain networks that show high consistency across subjects and different cognitive states. However, the relationship between the slowly fluctuating haemodynamic responses and the underlying neural mechanisms is not well understood. Resting state studies have revealed spatial similarities in the estimated network hub locations derived using haemodynamic and electrophysiological recordings, suggesting a direct neural basis for the widely described functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) resting state networks. To truly understand the nature of the relationship between electrophysiology and haemodynamics it is important to move away from a task absent state and to establish if such networks are differentially modulated by cognitive processing. The present parallel fMRI and magnetoencephalography (MEG) experiment investigated the structural similarities between haemodynamic networks and their electrophysiological counterparts when either the stimulus or the task was varied. Connectivity patterns underlying action vs. object naming (task-driven modulations), and action vs. object images (stimulus-driven modulations) were identified in a data driven all-to-all connectivity analysis, with cross spectral coherence adopted as a metric of functional connectivity in both MEG and fMRI. We observed a striking difference in functional connectivity between conditions. The spectral profiles of the frequency-specific network similarity differed significantly for the task-driven vs. stimulus-driven connectivity modulations. While the greatest similarity between MEG and fMRI derived networks was observed at neural frequencies below 30 Hz, haemodynamic network interactions could not be attributed to a single frequency band. Instead, the entire spectral profile should be taken into account when assessing the correspondence between MEG and fMRI networks. Task-driven network hubs, evident in both MEG and fMRI, were found in cortical regions previously associated with language processing, including the posterior temporal cortex and the inferior frontal cortex. Network hubs related to stimulus-driven modulations, however, were found in regions related to object recognition and visual processing, including the lateral occipital cortex. Overall, the results depict a shift in network structure when moving from a task dependent modulation to a stimulus dependent modulation, revealing a reorganization of large-scale functional connectivity during task performance.

[1]  William D. Penny,et al.  Bayesian Comparison of Neurovascular Coupling Models Using EEG-fMRI , 2011, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[2]  F. L. D. Silva,et al.  Event-related EEG/MEG synchronization and desynchronization: basic principles , 1999, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[3]  Noah D. Brenowitz,et al.  Whole-brain, time-locked activation with simple tasks revealed using massive averaging and model-free analysis , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[4]  R. Ilmoniemi,et al.  Magnetoencephalography-theory, instrumentation, and applications to noninvasive studies of the working human brain , 1993 .

[5]  Cedric E. Ginestet,et al.  Statistical network analysis for functional MRI: summary networks and group comparisons , 2013, Front. Comput. Neurosci..

[6]  M. Husain,et al.  Role of right posterior parietal cortex in maintaining attention to spatial locations over time , 2009, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[7]  Matthew J. Brookes,et al.  Paired pulse depression in the somatosensory cortex: Associations between MEG and BOLD fMRI , 2012, NeuroImage.

[8]  N. Logothetis,et al.  Neurophysiological investigation of the basis of the fMRI signal , 2001, Nature.

[9]  J. Schoffelen,et al.  Source connectivity analysis with MEG and EEG , 2009, Human brain mapping.

[10]  David A. Leopold,et al.  Dynamic functional connectivity: Promise, issues, and interpretations , 2013, NeuroImage.

[11]  Riitta Salmelin,et al.  Task‐sensitive reconfiguration of corticocortical 6–20 Hz oscillatory coherence in naturalistic human performance , 2015, Human brain mapping.

[12]  Mia Liljeström,et al.  Comparing MEG and fMRI views to naming actions and objects , 2009, NeuroImage.

[13]  Mia Liljeström,et al.  Perceiving and naming actions and objects , 2008, NeuroImage.

[14]  Matthew J. Brookes,et al.  GLM-beamformer method demonstrates stationary field, alpha ERD and gamma ERS co-localisation with fMRI BOLD response in visual cortex , 2005, NeuroImage.

[15]  Arne D. Ekstrom,et al.  Correlation between BOLD fMRI and theta-band local field potentials in the human hippocampal area. , 2009, Journal of neurophysiology.

[16]  Edward T. Bullmore,et al.  Whole-brain anatomical networks: Does the choice of nodes matter? , 2010, NeuroImage.

[17]  S. Taulu,et al.  Spatiotemporal signal space separation method for rejecting nearby interference in MEG measurements , 2006, Physics in medicine and biology.

[18]  E. Bullmore,et al.  A Resilient, Low-Frequency, Small-World Human Brain Functional Network with Highly Connected Association Cortical Hubs , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[19]  Viviana Betti,et al.  Natural Scenes Viewing Alters the Dynamics of Functional Connectivity in the Human Brain , 2013, Neuron.

[20]  Edward T. Bullmore,et al.  Efficiency and Cost of Economical Brain Functional Networks , 2007, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[21]  G. Barnes,et al.  Assessing interactions of linear and nonlinear neuronal sources using MEG beamformers: a proof of concept , 2005, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[22]  M. Fox,et al.  Spontaneous fluctuations in brain activity observed with functional magnetic resonance imaging , 2007, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[23]  W. Drongelen,et al.  Localization of brain electrical activity via linearly constrained minimum variance spatial filtering , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[24]  B. Biswal,et al.  Functional connectivity in the motor cortex of resting human brain using echo‐planar mri , 1995, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[25]  Jan Kujala,et al.  Localization of correlated network activity at the cortical level with MEG , 2008, NeuroImage.

[26]  Omer Tal,et al.  Caffeine-Induced Global Reductions in Resting-State BOLD Connectivity Reflect Widespread Decreases in MEG Connectivity , 2013, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[27]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  The lateral occipital complex and its role in object recognition , 2001, Vision Research.

[28]  M. Siegel,et al.  A framework for local cortical oscillation patterns , 2011, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[29]  Matthew J. Brookes,et al.  Measuring functional connectivity using MEG: Methodology and comparison with fcMRI , 2011, NeuroImage.

[30]  M. Corbetta,et al.  A Cortical Core for Dynamic Integration of Functional Networks in the Resting Human Brain , 2012, Neuron.

[31]  Krish D. Singh,et al.  Functional decoupling of BOLD and gamma‐band amplitudes in human primary visual cortex , 2009, Human brain mapping.

[32]  H. Renvall,et al.  Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Blood Oxygenation Level-Dependent Signal and Magnetoencephalography Evoked Responses Yield Different Neural Functionality in Reading , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[33]  E. Bullmore,et al.  Undirected graphs of frequency-dependent functional connectivity in whole brain networks , 2005, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[34]  J Gross,et al.  REPRINTS , 1962, The Lancet.

[35]  A. Turken,et al.  The Neural Architecture of the Language Comprehension Network: Converging Evidence from Lesion and Connectivity Analyses , 2011, Front. Syst. Neurosci..

[36]  P. Fries A mechanism for cognitive dynamics: neuronal communication through neuronal coherence , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[37]  S. Petersen,et al.  Task-Dependent Modulation of Regions in the Left Inferior Frontal Cortex during Semantic Processing , 2001, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[38]  R. VanRullen,et al.  An oscillatory mechanism for prioritizing salient unattended stimuli , 2012, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[39]  Thomas T. Liu,et al.  MEG source imaging method using fast L1 minimum-norm and its applications to signals with brain noise and human resting-state source amplitude images , 2014, NeuroImage.

[40]  Andreas K. Engel,et al.  Temporal Binding, Binocular Rivalry, and Consciousness , 1999, Consciousness and Cognition.

[41]  D. Cohen Magnetoencephalography: Evidence of Magnetic Fields Produced by Alpha-Rhythm Currents , 1968, Science.

[42]  J. Palva,et al.  New vistas for alpha-frequency band oscillations. , 2007, Trends in neurosciences.

[43]  Mia Liljeström,et al.  Multivariate analysis of correlation between electrophysiological and hemodynamic responses during cognitive processing , 2014, NeuroImage.

[44]  Andreas Daffertshofer,et al.  Neural synchrony within the motor system: what have we learned so far? , 2012, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[45]  R. Hari,et al.  Characterization of spontaneous MEG rhythms in healthy adults. , 1994, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[46]  J. Palva,et al.  New vistas for α-frequency band oscillations , 2007, Trends in Neurosciences.

[47]  O. Sporns,et al.  Identification and Classification of Hubs in Brain Networks , 2007, PloS one.

[48]  I. Fried,et al.  Coupling Between Neuronal Firing, Field Potentials, and fMRI in Human Auditory Cortex , 2005, Science.

[49]  Riitta Salmelin,et al.  Producing Speech with a Newly Learned Morphosyntax and Vocabulary: An Magnetoencephalography Study , 2014, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[50]  V. Calhoun,et al.  Functional network connectivity during rest and task conditions: A comparative study , 2013, Human brain mapping.

[51]  Krish D. Singh,et al.  A new approach to neuroimaging with magnetoencephalography , 2005, Human brain mapping.

[52]  Andreas Daffertshofer,et al.  Comparing Brain Networks of Different Size and Connectivity Density Using Graph Theory , 2010, PloS one.

[53]  J. Martinerie,et al.  The brainweb: Phase synchronization and large-scale integration , 2001, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[54]  C. Myers,et al.  Using networks to measure similarity between genes: association index selection , 2013, Nature Methods.

[55]  M. Catani,et al.  The arcuate fasciculus and the disconnection theme in language and aphasia: History and current state , 2008, Cortex.

[56]  Elizabeth W. Pang,et al.  From Structure to Circuits: The Contribution of MEG Connectivity Studies to Functional Neurosurgery , 2016, Front. Neuroanat..

[57]  Stephen M Smith,et al.  Correspondence of the brain's functional architecture during activation and rest , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[58]  Peter Hagoort,et al.  Topographical functional connectivity pattern in the perisylvian language networks. , 2010, Cerebral cortex.

[59]  D. Tank,et al.  Brain magnetic resonance imaging with contrast dependent on blood oxygenation. , 1990, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[60]  F. Carver,et al.  Complex relationship between BOLD signal and synchronization/desynchronization of human brain MEG oscillations , 2007, Human brain mapping.

[61]  Michael A. DiSano,et al.  Variability of the Relationship between Electrophysiology and BOLD-fMRI across Cortical Regions in Humans , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[62]  Olaf Sporns,et al.  Complex network measures of brain connectivity: Uses and interpretations , 2010, NeuroImage.

[63]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Electrophysiological signatures of resting state networks in the human brain , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[64]  C. J. Stam,et al.  Functional connectivity patterns of human magnetoencephalographic recordings: a ‘small-world’ network? , 2004, Neuroscience Letters.

[65]  R. Turner,et al.  Eigenvector Centrality Mapping for Analyzing Connectivity Patterns in fMRI Data of the Human Brain , 2010, PloS one.

[66]  Joachim Gross,et al.  Good practice for conducting and reporting MEG research , 2013, NeuroImage.

[67]  M. V. D. Heuvel,et al.  Exploring the brain network: A review on resting-state fMRI functional connectivity , 2010, European Neuropsychopharmacology.

[68]  W. Levelt,et al.  The spatial and temporal signatures of word production components , 2004, Cognition.

[69]  R. Desimone,et al.  Laminar differences in gamma and alpha coherence in the ventral stream , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[70]  R. Traub,et al.  Inhibition-based rhythms: experimental and mathematical observations on network dynamics. , 2000, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[71]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Temporal dynamics of spontaneous MEG activity in brain networks , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[72]  Edward T. Bullmore,et al.  Connectivity differences in brain networks , 2012, NeuroImage.

[73]  Lee M. Miller,et al.  Measuring interregional functional connectivity using coherence and partial coherence analyses of fMRI data , 2004, NeuroImage.

[74]  Thomas T. Liu,et al.  A component based noise correction method (CompCor) for BOLD and perfusion based fMRI , 2007, NeuroImage.

[75]  Gareth R. Barnes,et al.  Frequency-dependent functional connectivity within resting-state networks: An atlas-based MEG beamformer solution , 2012, NeuroImage.

[76]  Peter A. Bandettini,et al.  Separating respiratory-variation-related fluctuations from neuronal-activity-related fluctuations in fMRI , 2006, NeuroImage.

[77]  N. Volkow,et al.  Resting Functional Connectivity of Language Networks: Characterization and Reproducibility , 2011, Molecular Psychiatry.

[78]  Thomas E. Nichols,et al.  Brain Network Analysis: Separating Cost from Topology Using Cost-Integration , 2011, PloS one.

[79]  M M Mesulam,et al.  Large‐scale neurocognitive networks and distributed processing for attention, language, and memory , 1990, Annals of neurology.

[80]  Cathy J. Price,et al.  A review and synthesis of the first 20 years of PET and fMRI studies of heard speech, spoken language and reading , 2012, NeuroImage.

[81]  Naoki Tanaka,et al.  Quantitative evaluation of interrelations between spontaneous low-frequency oscillations in cerebral hemodynamics and systemic cardiovascular dynamics , 2006, NeuroImage.

[82]  E. Formisano,et al.  Phase coupling in a cerebro-cerebellar network at 8-13 Hz during reading. , 2007, Cerebral cortex.

[83]  Derek K. Jones,et al.  Perisylvian language networks of the human brain , 2005, Annals of neurology.

[84]  Yihong Yang,et al.  Frequency specificity of functional connectivity in brain networks , 2008, NeuroImage.

[85]  R. Salmelin,et al.  Dynamic reconfiguration of the language network preceding onset of speech in picture naming , 2014, Human brain mapping.

[86]  P. Schyns,et al.  Speech Rhythms and Multiplexed Oscillatory Sensory Coding in the Human Brain , 2013, PLoS biology.

[87]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Large-scale cortical correlation structure of spontaneous oscillatory activity , 2012, Nature Neuroscience.

[88]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Distributed representation of objects in the human ventral visual pathway. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[89]  Darren Price,et al.  Investigating the electrophysiological basis of resting state networks using magnetoencephalography , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[90]  R. Hari,et al.  Dynamics of brain activation during picture naming , 1994, Nature.

[91]  Jin Fan,et al.  Different topological organization of human brain functional networks with eyes open versus eyes closed , 2014, NeuroImage.

[92]  Jan Kujala,et al.  A method for spatiotemporal mapping of event-related modulation of cortical rhythmic activity , 2008, NeuroImage.

[93]  Piet Van Mieghem,et al.  Predicting haemodynamic networks using electrophysiology: The role of non-linear and cross-frequency interactions , 2016, NeuroImage.

[94]  Mia Liljeström,et al.  MEG evoked responses and rhythmic activity provide spatiotemporally complementary measures of neural activity in language production , 2012, NeuroImage.

[95]  Edwin van Dellen,et al.  Structural degree predicts functional network connectivity: A multimodal resting-state fMRI and MEG study , 2014, NeuroImage.

[96]  N. Tzourio-Mazoyer,et al.  Automated Anatomical Labeling of Activations in SPM Using a Macroscopic Anatomical Parcellation of the MNI MRI Single-Subject Brain , 2002, NeuroImage.

[97]  William W. Graves,et al.  Where is the semantic system? A critical review and meta-analysis of 120 functional neuroimaging studies. , 2009, Cerebral cortex.

[98]  G. Ermentrout,et al.  Gamma rhythms and beta rhythms have different synchronization properties. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.