Generating linked technology-socioeconomic scenarios for emerging energy transitions

The formulation and use of scenarios is now a fundamental part of national and global efforts to assess and plan for climate change. While scenario development initially focused on the technical dimensions of energy, emissions and climate response, in recent years parallel sets of shared socio-economic pathways have been developed to portray the values, motivations, and sociopolitical and institutional dimensions of these systems. However, integrating the technical and social aspects of evolving energy systems is difficult, with transitions dependent on highly uncertain technological advances, social preferences, political governance, climate urgency, and the interaction of these elements to maintain or overcome systemic inertia. A broad range of interdisciplinary knowledge is needed to structure and evaluate these processes, many of which involve a mix of qualitative and quantitative factors. To structure and facilitate the necessary linkages this paper presents an approach for generating a plausible range of scenarios for an emerging energy technology. The method considers influences among technical and social factors that can encourage or impede necessary improvements in the performance and cost of the technology, as well the processes affecting public acceptance and the establishment of governance structures necessary to support effective planning and implementation. A Bayesian network is used to capture relationships among the technological and socioeconomic factors likely to affect the probability that the technology will achieve significant penetration and adoption. The method is demonstrated for carbon capture and storage (CCS): a potential technology on the pathway to deep decarbonization. A preliminary set of expert elicitations is conducted to illustrate how relationships between these factors can be estimated. This establishes a prior or baseline network that can be subsequently analyzed by choosing either optimistic or pessimistic assumptions for respective groups of technical and social variables, identifying sets of key factors that limit or encourage successful deployment.

[1]  Tomoko Hasegawa,et al.  Scenarios towards limiting global mean temperature increase below 1.5 °C , 2018, Nature Climate Change.

[2]  D. Rosenbloom,et al.  Pathways: An emerging concept for the theory and governance of low-carbon transitions , 2017 .

[3]  J. Eom,et al.  The Shared Socioeconomic Pathways and their energy, land use, and greenhouse gas emissions implications: An overview , 2017 .

[4]  Patrícia Fortes,et al.  Long-term energy scenarios: : Bridging the gap between socio-economic storylines and energy modeling , 2015 .

[5]  Richard E. Neapolitan,et al.  Learning Bayesian networks , 2007, KDD '07.

[6]  Peter J. G. Pearson,et al.  A socio-technical framework for assessing the viability of carbon capture and storage technology , 2012 .

[7]  Faisal Khan,et al.  Dynamic hazard identification and scenario mapping using Bayesian network , 2017 .

[8]  Petra Döll,et al.  Causal networks and scenarios: participatory strategy development for promoting renewable electricity generation , 2016 .

[9]  M. Strubegger,et al.  Shared Socio-Economic Pathways of the Energy Sector – Quantifying the Narratives , 2017 .

[10]  Mark E. Borsuk,et al.  Methods for translating narrative scenarios into quantitative assessments of land use change , 2016, Environ. Model. Softw..

[11]  Paul Upham,et al.  The acceptability of CO2 capture and storage (CCS) in Europe: An assessment of the key determining factors. Part 2. The social acceptability of CCS and the wider impacts and repercussions of its implementation , 2009 .

[12]  Alastair R. Buckley,et al.  A review of energy systems models in the UK: Prevalent usage and categorisation , 2016 .

[13]  Jessica M. Libertini,et al.  Scenario Development and Foresight Analysis: Exploring Options to Inform Choices , 2018, Annual Review of Environment and Resources.

[14]  Dianne Hall,et al.  Modelling spatial and temporal changes with GIS and Spatial and Dynamic Bayesian Networks , 2016, Environ. Model. Softw..

[15]  Mitchell J. Small,et al.  A Bayesian belief network (BBN) for combining evidence from multiple CO2 leak detection technologies , 2012 .

[16]  John F. B. Mitchell,et al.  The next generation of scenarios for climate change research and assessment , 2010, Nature.

[17]  Kerrie Mengersen,et al.  Managing seagrass resilience under cumulative dredging affecting light: Predicting risk using dynamic Bayesian networks , 2018 .

[18]  Lukas Braunreiter,et al.  Of sailors and divers: How researchers use energy scenarios , 2018, Energy Research & Social Science.

[19]  Elena Verdolini,et al.  Quantifying the Effects of Expert Selection and Elicitation Design on Experts’ Confidence in Their Judgments About Future Energy Technologies , 2016, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[20]  Carlo Giupponi,et al.  Integrated assessment of sea-level rise adaptation strategies using a Bayesian decision network approach , 2013, Environ. Model. Softw..

[21]  Bart W. Terwel,et al.  Going beyond the properties of CO2 capture and storage (CCS) technology: How trust in stakeholders affects public acceptance of CCS , 2011 .

[22]  Keywan Riahi,et al.  A new scenario framework for Climate Change Research: scenario matrix architecture , 2014, Climatic Change.

[23]  Gulgun Kayakutlu,et al.  Clean energy investment scenarios using the Bayesian network , 2014 .

[24]  Neil Strachan,et al.  Reinvigorating the scenario technique to expand uncertainty consideration , 2016, Climatic Change.

[25]  Sgouris Sgouridis,et al.  The sower's way : quantifying the narrowing net-energy pathways to a global energy transition , 2016 .

[26]  Matt Gerstenberger,et al.  Bi-directional risk assessment in carbon capture and storage with Bayesian Networks , 2015 .

[27]  Mitchell J. Small,et al.  An expert-based bayesian assessment of 2030 German new vehicle CO2 emissions and related costs , 2016 .

[28]  Valentina Bosetti,et al.  Future Prospects for Energy Technologies: Insights from Expert Elicitations , 2018, Review of Environmental Economics and Policy.

[29]  Jan H. Kwakkel,et al.  Coping with uncertainty in climate policy making: (Mis)understanding scenario studies , 2013 .

[30]  Todd Flach,et al.  The acceptability of CO2 capture and storage (CCS) in Europe: An assessment of the key determining factors: Part 1. Scientific, technical and economic dimensions , 2009 .

[31]  Philip Ringrose,et al.  Principles of sustainability and physics as a basis for the low-carbon energy transition , 2017, Petroleum Geoscience.

[32]  Keywan Riahi,et al.  A new scenario framework for climate change research: the concept of shared socioeconomic pathways , 2013, Climatic Change.

[33]  James Price,et al.  Modelling to generate alternatives: A technique to explore uncertainty in energy-environment-economy models , 2017 .

[34]  Matthew C. Gerstenberger,et al.  A Bayesian network and structured expert elicitation for Otway Stage 2C: Detection of injected CO2 in a saline aquifer , 2016 .

[35]  Sergey Paltsev,et al.  Energy scenarios: the value and limits of scenario analysis , 2017 .

[36]  Pablo H. Ibargüengoytia,et al.  Bayesian networks in renewable energy systems: A bibliographical survey , 2016 .

[37]  Russell Richards,et al.  Bayesian belief modeling of climate change impacts for informing regional adaptation options , 2013, Environ. Model. Softw..

[38]  Vanessa J. Schweizer,et al.  Systematic construction of global socioeconomic pathways using internally consistent element combinations , 2014, Climatic Change.

[39]  Michaela Fürsch,et al.  Decarbonizing Europe's power sector by 2050 — Analyzing the economic implications of alternative decarbonization pathways , 2013 .

[40]  Jude Herijadi Kurniawan,et al.  Systematically linking qualitative elements of scenarios across levels, scales, and sectors , 2016, Environ. Model. Softw..

[41]  E. Jochem,et al.  Introduction to Energy Systems Modelling , 2012 .

[42]  Céline Guivarch,et al.  The diversity of socio-economic pathways and CO2 emissions scenarios: Insights from the investigation of a scenarios database , 2016, Environ. Model. Softw..

[43]  Daniela Vairo,et al.  Third generation algae biofuels in Italy by 2030: A scenario analysis using Bayesian networks , 2017 .

[44]  Mark E. Borsuk,et al.  A Bayesian network of eutrophication models for synthesis, prediction, and uncertainty analysis , 2004 .