Deploying Mechanized Cut-to-Length Technology in Italy: Fleet Size, Annual Usage, and Costs

Abstract The authors conducted a survey of mechanized harvesting and processing machinery in Italy, with the purpose of understanding if the close-to-nature small-scale forestry typical of this country may prevent a reasonably intense utilization of modern technology, or entail a significant increase of its operating cost. Despite the challenging work conditions offered by Italian forestry, modern forest technology has already made significant inroads, as witnessed by a small yet substantial harvester and processor fleet, counting more than 80 units, 75% of which are mounted on general-purpose carriers. Usage levels are lower than those reported for northern and central Europe, but still in excess of 1000 machine hours year-1, at least for the prime movers. Insurance, repair, and maintenance costs are significantly lower than generally reported in current literature. However, empirical data on machine costs is very scarce, and most studies report estimates rather than measured values. Such estimates are often obtained with the same basic methods derived from agriculture, thus raising the question of whether their adaptation to forestry use should be further refined.

[1]  Lauri Sikanen,et al.  The cost effect of forest machine relocations on logging costs in Finland , 2006 .

[2]  Natascia Magagnotti,et al.  Options for the Mechanized Processing of Hardwood Trees in Mediterranean Forests , 2009 .

[3]  Jerry Johansson Backhoe loaders as base machines in logging operations , 1995 .

[4]  J. Johansson,et al.  Case studies on farm tractors as base machines for single-grip thinnings harvester heads , 1996 .

[5]  Edwin S. Miyata,et al.  Determining fixed and operating costs of logging equipment. , 1980 .

[6]  Geoff A. Bright Calculating costs and charges for forest machinery use , 2004 .

[7]  Jingxin Wang,et al.  Simulating Cut-to-Length Harvesting Operations in Appalachian Hardwoods , 2005 .

[8]  Mark Rickenbach,et al.  Logging firms, nonindustrial private forests, and forest parcelization: evidence of firm specialization and its impact on sustainable timber supply , 2006 .

[9]  Tomas Nordfjell,et al.  Productivity and Costs in Shelterwood Harvesting , 2000 .

[10]  von Bodelschwingh,et al.  Analyse der Rundholzlogistik in der Deutschen Forst- und Holzwirtschaft , 2006 .

[11]  Anders Grönlund,et al.  Assessing the role of the harvester within the forestry-wood chain , 2001 .

[12]  F. W. Cubbage,et al.  Cross-sectional estimates of logging equipment resale values , 1991 .

[13]  Jennifer L Bell,et al.  Changes in logging injury rates associated with use of feller-bunchers in West Virginia. , 2002, Journal of safety research.

[14]  William F. Lazarus,et al.  SUGGESTED PROCEDURES FOR ESTIMATING FARM MACHINERY COSTS , 2002 .

[15]  Colin Price,et al.  Creaming the best, or creatively transforming? Might felling the biggest trees first be a win–win strategy? , 2006 .

[16]  Jingxin Wang,et al.  Production analysis of an excavator-based harvester: A case study in Finnish forest operations , 2002 .

[17]  Lauri Sikanen,et al.  Feasibility of Excavator-Based Harvester in Thinnings of Peatland Forests , 2004 .

[18]  Raffaele Spinelli,et al.  Productivity and cost of CTL harvesting of Eucalyptus globulus stands using excavator-based harvesters , 2002 .

[19]  Gary Kerr,et al.  Seedling height and the impact of harvesting operations on advance regeneration of conifer species in upland Britain , 2009 .

[20]  R. W. Brinker,et al.  Machine Rates for Selected Forest Harvesting Machines , 2002 .