Role of 18F-FDG PET/CT in Staging and Follow-up of Lymphoma in Pediatric and Young Adult Patients

Objective: To assess the role of 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) PET/CT in pediatric patients with Hodgkin disease (HD) and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). Materials and Methods: 31 patients, mean age 12.9 ± 5.1, HD (n = 24), and NHL (n = 7) underwent 18F-FDG PET/CT at diagnosis (n = 31 studies) and later in the course of the disease (n = 75 studies). The findings of PET/CT were correlated with diagnostic CT and clinical follow-up. Results: PET/CT findings resulted in a change of disease staging in 10 patients (32.3%), upstaging in 7 (22.6%) and downstaging in 3 (9.6%). On a lesion analysis, 164 disease sites were detected by PET/CT of which 38 were overlooked by DCT. At mid-treatment, PET was negative in 28 out of 31 patients (90%) with negative predictive value of 96% as all latter patients except for 1, were disease free (mean 15.4 ± 8.8 months). The positive predictive value of persistent increased 18F-FDG uptake was 100% as 3 patients with latter findings had active disease. On the CT part, 76 residual masses were identified in 22 patients. Increased 18F-FDG uptake was detected in 11 masses in 4 patients who had active disease. Remaining 65 PET negative masses were false positive findings. The positive predictive value of residual CT mass was 14%. Conclusions: PET/CT is associated with change in staging in approximately 1 out of 3 pediatric patients with HD and NHL. When used for monitoring response to treatment, a negative study is associated with disease-free period, even when residual mass is detected. A positive PET study indicates residual malignant disease.

[1]  J. Vose,et al.  Response assessment of aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma by integrated International Workshop Criteria and fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[2]  W. Heindel,et al.  Staging in childhood lymphoma: differences between FDG-PET and CT. , 2005, Nuklearmedizin. Nuclear medicine.

[3]  M. Hudson,et al.  18F-FDG-avid sites mimicking active disease in pediatric Hodgkin’s , 2005, Pediatric Radiology.

[4]  Z. Miltényi,et al.  Mediastinal Bulky Tumour in Hodgkin’s Disease and Prognostic Value of Positron Emission Tomography in the Evaluation of Post-Treatment Residual Masses , 2004, Acta Haematologica.

[5]  Thomas F Hany,et al.  Non-Hodgkin lymphoma and Hodgkin disease: coregistered FDG PET and CT at staging and restaging--do we need contrast-enhanced CT? , 2004, Radiology.

[6]  Z. Keidar,et al.  Positron emission tomography in the evaluation of lymphoma. , 2004, Seminars in nuclear medicine.

[7]  A. D. Van den Abbeele,et al.  FDG-PET is Superior to Gallium Scintigraphy in Staging and More Sensitive in the Follow-up of Patients with de novo Hodgkin Lymphoma: A Blinded Comparison , 2004, Leukemia & lymphoma.

[8]  S. Stroobants,et al.  Hodgkin's lymphoma: evolving concepts with implications for practice. , 2004, Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program.

[9]  M. Hudson,et al.  PET imaging in pediatric Hodgkin’s lymphoma , 2004, Pediatric Radiology.

[10]  F. Bénard,et al.  Prognostic value of PET using 18F-FDG in Hodgkin's disease for posttreatment evaluation. , 2003, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[11]  O. Linton,et al.  National conference on dose reduction in CT, with an emphasis on pediatric patients. , 2003, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[12]  R. Hustinx,et al.  PET scan imaging in oncology. , 2003, European journal of cancer.

[13]  S. Reske PET and restaging of malignant lymphoma including residual masses and relapse , 2003, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[14]  J. Czernin,et al.  PET for staging of Hodgkin's disease and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma , 2003, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[15]  Donald P. Frush,et al.  Pediatric CT: practical approach to diminish the radiation dose , 2002, Pediatric Radiology.

[16]  G. Leverger,et al.  [18F]FDG in childhood lymphoma: clinical utility and impact on management , 2002, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[17]  S. Perkins,et al.  Feasibility of upfront dose-intensive chemotherapy in children with advanced-stage Hodgkin's lymphoma: preliminary results from the Children's Cancer Group Study CCG-59704. , 2002, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[18]  B Beuthien-Baumann,et al.  Prognostic value of positron emission tomography in the evaluation of post‐treatment residual mass in patients with Hodgkin's disease and non‐Hodgkin's lymphoma , 2001, British journal of haematology.

[19]  C D Claussen,et al.  Comparison of 18FDG-PET with CT scans in the evaluation of patients with residual and recurrent Hodgkin's lymphoma. , 2001, Oncology reports.

[20]  L. Kornreich,et al.  Significance of residual abdominal masses in children with abdominal Burkitt's lymphoma , 2001, Pediatric Radiology.

[21]  V. Tsapaki,et al.  Application of European Commission reference dose levels in CT examinations in Crete, Greece. , 2001, The British journal of radiology.

[22]  J. Talbot,et al.  [18F]-FDG positron imaging in clinical management of lymphoma patients. , 2001, Critical reviews in oncology/hematology.

[23]  P. Dupont,et al.  Prognostic value of positron emission tomography (PET) with fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose ([18F]FDG) after first-line chemotherapy in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: is [18F]FDG-PET a valid alternative to conventional diagnostic methods? , 2001, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[24]  L. Kostakoglu,et al.  Fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in the staging and follow-up of lymphoma: is it time to shift gears? , 2000, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[25]  L. Kostakoglu,et al.  Positron emission tomography in lymphoma: comparison with computed tomography and Gallium-67 single photon emission computed tomography. , 2000, Clinical lymphoma.

[26]  S. Hain,et al.  18-FDG-PET as a Prognostic Indicator in the Treatment of Aggressive Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma-Comparison with CT , 2000, Leukemia & lymphoma.

[27]  G. Jerusalem,et al.  Whole-body positron emission tomography using 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose for posttreatment evaluation in Hodgkin's disease and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma has higher diagnostic and prognostic value than classical computed tomography scan imaging. , 1999, Blood.

[28]  R. Felix,et al.  Relationships between physical dose quantities and patient dose in CT. , 1999, The British journal of radiology.

[29]  G. Jerusalem,et al.  Whole-body 18F-FDG PET for the evaluation of patients with Hodgkin's disease and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. , 1999, Nuclear medicine communications.

[30]  M Schwaiger,et al.  Positron emission tomography in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: assessment of chemotherapy with fluorodeoxyglucose. , 1998, Blood.

[31]  V. R. McCready,et al.  FDG accumulation and tumor biology. , 1998, Nuclear medicine and biology.

[32]  S. Weiss,et al.  Sedation of pediatric patients for nuclear medicine procedures. , 1993, Seminars in nuclear medicine.

[33]  C. Goodman,et al.  Food and Drug Administration Center for Devices and Radiological Health , 1988 .