Role of 18F-FDG PET/CT in Staging and Follow-up of Lymphoma in Pediatric and Young Adult Patients
暂无分享,去创建一个
Ur Metser | Isaac Yaniv | Elka Miller | A. Toren | I. Yaniv | U. Metser | R. Dvir | E. Even-Sapir | E. Miller | Amos Toren | Einat Even-Sapir | Liat Ben Sira | Y. Burstein | G. Avrahami | Rina Dvir | Galia Avrahami | Dalia Valdman | Dror Sayar | Yoav Burstein | D. Sayar | L. Sira | Dalia Valdman
[1] J. Vose,et al. Response assessment of aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma by integrated International Workshop Criteria and fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
[2] W. Heindel,et al. Staging in childhood lymphoma: differences between FDG-PET and CT. , 2005, Nuklearmedizin. Nuclear medicine.
[3] M. Hudson,et al. 18F-FDG-avid sites mimicking active disease in pediatric Hodgkin’s , 2005, Pediatric Radiology.
[4] Z. Miltényi,et al. Mediastinal Bulky Tumour in Hodgkin’s Disease and Prognostic Value of Positron Emission Tomography in the Evaluation of Post-Treatment Residual Masses , 2004, Acta Haematologica.
[5] Thomas F Hany,et al. Non-Hodgkin lymphoma and Hodgkin disease: coregistered FDG PET and CT at staging and restaging--do we need contrast-enhanced CT? , 2004, Radiology.
[6] Z. Keidar,et al. Positron emission tomography in the evaluation of lymphoma. , 2004, Seminars in nuclear medicine.
[7] A. D. Van den Abbeele,et al. FDG-PET is Superior to Gallium Scintigraphy in Staging and More Sensitive in the Follow-up of Patients with de novo Hodgkin Lymphoma: A Blinded Comparison , 2004, Leukemia & lymphoma.
[8] S. Stroobants,et al. Hodgkin's lymphoma: evolving concepts with implications for practice. , 2004, Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program.
[9] M. Hudson,et al. PET imaging in pediatric Hodgkin’s lymphoma , 2004, Pediatric Radiology.
[10] F. Bénard,et al. Prognostic value of PET using 18F-FDG in Hodgkin's disease for posttreatment evaluation. , 2003, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.
[11] O. Linton,et al. National conference on dose reduction in CT, with an emphasis on pediatric patients. , 2003, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.
[12] R. Hustinx,et al. PET scan imaging in oncology. , 2003, European journal of cancer.
[13] S. Reske. PET and restaging of malignant lymphoma including residual masses and relapse , 2003, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.
[14] J. Czernin,et al. PET for staging of Hodgkin's disease and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma , 2003, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.
[15] Donald P. Frush,et al. Pediatric CT: practical approach to diminish the radiation dose , 2002, Pediatric Radiology.
[16] G. Leverger,et al. [18F]FDG in childhood lymphoma: clinical utility and impact on management , 2002, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.
[17] S. Perkins,et al. Feasibility of upfront dose-intensive chemotherapy in children with advanced-stage Hodgkin's lymphoma: preliminary results from the Children's Cancer Group Study CCG-59704. , 2002, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.
[18] B Beuthien-Baumann,et al. Prognostic value of positron emission tomography in the evaluation of post‐treatment residual mass in patients with Hodgkin's disease and non‐Hodgkin's lymphoma , 2001, British journal of haematology.
[19] C D Claussen,et al. Comparison of 18FDG-PET with CT scans in the evaluation of patients with residual and recurrent Hodgkin's lymphoma. , 2001, Oncology reports.
[20] L. Kornreich,et al. Significance of residual abdominal masses in children with abdominal Burkitt's lymphoma , 2001, Pediatric Radiology.
[21] V. Tsapaki,et al. Application of European Commission reference dose levels in CT examinations in Crete, Greece. , 2001, The British journal of radiology.
[22] J. Talbot,et al. [18F]-FDG positron imaging in clinical management of lymphoma patients. , 2001, Critical reviews in oncology/hematology.
[23] P. Dupont,et al. Prognostic value of positron emission tomography (PET) with fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose ([18F]FDG) after first-line chemotherapy in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: is [18F]FDG-PET a valid alternative to conventional diagnostic methods? , 2001, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
[24] L. Kostakoglu,et al. Fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in the staging and follow-up of lymphoma: is it time to shift gears? , 2000, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine.
[25] L. Kostakoglu,et al. Positron emission tomography in lymphoma: comparison with computed tomography and Gallium-67 single photon emission computed tomography. , 2000, Clinical lymphoma.
[26] S. Hain,et al. 18-FDG-PET as a Prognostic Indicator in the Treatment of Aggressive Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma-Comparison with CT , 2000, Leukemia & lymphoma.
[27] G. Jerusalem,et al. Whole-body positron emission tomography using 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose for posttreatment evaluation in Hodgkin's disease and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma has higher diagnostic and prognostic value than classical computed tomography scan imaging. , 1999, Blood.
[28] R. Felix,et al. Relationships between physical dose quantities and patient dose in CT. , 1999, The British journal of radiology.
[29] G. Jerusalem,et al. Whole-body 18F-FDG PET for the evaluation of patients with Hodgkin's disease and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. , 1999, Nuclear medicine communications.
[30] M Schwaiger,et al. Positron emission tomography in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: assessment of chemotherapy with fluorodeoxyglucose. , 1998, Blood.
[31] V. R. McCready,et al. FDG accumulation and tumor biology. , 1998, Nuclear medicine and biology.
[32] S. Weiss,et al. Sedation of pediatric patients for nuclear medicine procedures. , 1993, Seminars in nuclear medicine.
[33] C. Goodman,et al. Food and Drug Administration Center for Devices and Radiological Health , 1988 .