Acoustic emission during tensile testing of SiC-fibre-reinforced BMAS glass-ceramic composites

One of the problems preventing the industrial application of ceramic-matrix composites is the lack of an efficient method to detect and discriminate among types of damage occurring during service. With this in mind, the mechanical response, damage development and acoustic emission activity during monotonic tensile testing of a BMAS glass-ceramic matrix reinforced with SiC fibres have been investigated. Damage initiation and propagation were easily detected and evaluated using the acoustic emission technique. Comparing the acoustic emission activity characteristics in simple lay-ups with those of more complex lay-ups allowed discrimination between matrix microcracking, matrix macrocracking accompanied by interface debonding, and delamination cracking. In this way, the paper contributes to the development of the acoustic emission technique for in situ monitoring of damage development in ceramic-matrix composites.

[1]  K. Prewo.  Fiber-reinforced ceramics: new opportunities for composite materials , 1989 .

[2]  K. Reifsnider,et al.  Internal Load Distribution Effects During Fatigue Loading of Composite Laminates , 1986 .

[3]  A. R. Bunsell,et al.  Failure mechanism discrimination in carbon fibre-reinforced epoxy composites , 1983 .

[4]  A. Evans,et al.  Damage and Failure in Unidirectional Ceramic–Matrix Composites , 1992 .

[5]  M. Gomina,et al.  Damage characterization of a 2D SiCSiC composite material , 1993 .

[6]  N. Pagano,et al.  Crack Initiation in Unidirectional Brittle‐Matrix Composites , 1991 .

[7]  J.-P. Favre,et al.  Acoustic emission analysis of the accumulation of cracks in CFRP cross-ply laminates under tensile loading , 1990 .

[8]  R. Davidge.  Fibre-reinforced ceramics , 1987 .

[9]  A. M. Daniel,et al.  Environmental ageing effects in a silicon carbide fibre‐reinforced glass‐ceramic matrix composite , 1995 .

[10]  Anthony G. Evans,et al.  In-plane mechanical properties of several ceramic-matrix composites , 1995 .

[11]  R. Bhatt,et al.  Laminate Behavior for SiC Fiber-Reinforced Reaction-Bonded Silicon Nitride Matrix Composites , 1990 .

[12]  Anthony G. Evans,et al.  Methodology for Relating the Tensile Constitutive Behavior of Ceramic‐Matrix Composites to Constituent Properties , 1994 .

[13]  M. D. Thouless,et al.  Effects of pull-out on the mechanical properties of ceramic-matrix composites , 1988 .

[14]  A. Evans,et al.  Damage Mechanisms and the Mechanical Properties of a Laminated 0/90 Ceramic/Matrix Composite , 1992 .

[15]  M. Gomina,et al.  Damage investigations in unidirectional SiC-MAS.L composite materials under quasi-static tensile loading , 1994 .

[16]  A. Evans.  Perspective on the Development of High‐Toughness Ceramics , 1990 .

[17]  Frank W. Zok,et al.  The physics and mechanics of fibre-reinforced brittle matrix composites , 1994, Journal of Materials Science.

[18]  L. Butkus,et al.  Tensile and Fatigue Behavior of Silicon Carbide Fiber‐Reinforced Aluminosilicate Glass , 1991 .

[19]  B. Harris,et al.  Matrix cracking and the mechanical behaviour of SiC─CAS composites , 1992, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[20]  S. Mall,et al.  Failure mechanisms in laminates of silicon carbide/calcium-aluminosilicate ceramic composite , 1992 .

[21]  A. Evans,et al.  The mechanics of matrix cracking in brittle-matrix fiber composites , 1985 .

[22]  Don J. Roth,et al.  Probability of detection of internal voids in structural ceramics using microfocus radiography , 1986 .

[23]  J. Lamon,et al.  An approach to the mechanical behaviour of SiC/SiC and C/SiC ceramic matrix composites , 1991 .

[24]  K. Prewo,et al.  Tensile performance of carbon-fibre-reinforced glass , 1988 .