Are Mortality and Acute Morbidity in Patients Presenting With Nonspecific Complaints Predictable Using Routine Variables?

OBJECTIVES Patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with nonspecific complaints are difficult to accurately triage, risk stratify, and diagnose. This can delay appropriate treatment. The extent to which key medical outcomes are at all predictable in these patients, and which (if any) predictors are useful, has previously been unclear. To investigate these questions, we tested an array of statistical and machine learning models in a large group of patients and estimated the predictability of mortality (which occurred in 6.6% of our sample of patients), acute morbidity (58%), and presence of acute infectious disease (28.2%). METHODS To investigate whether the best available tools can predict the three key outcomes, we fed data from a sample of 1,278 ED patients with nonspecific complaints into 17 state-of-the-art statistical and machine learning models. The patient sample stems from a diagnostic multicenter study with prospective 30-day follow-up conducted in Switzerland. Predictability of the three key medical outcomes was quantified by computing the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for each model. RESULTS The models performed at different levels but, on average, the predictability of the target outcomes ranged between 0.71 and 0.82. The better models clearly outperformed physicians' intuitive judgments of how ill patients looked (AUC = 0.67 for mortality, 0.65 for morbidity, and 0.60 for infectious disease). CONCLUSIONS Modeling techniques can be used to derive formalized models that, on average, predict the outcomes of mortality, acute morbidity, and acute infectious disease in patients with nonspecific complaints with a level of accuracy far beyond chance. The models also predicted these outcomes more accurately than did physicians' intuitive judgments of how ill the patients look; however, the latter was among the small set of best predictors for mortality and acute morbidity. These results lay the groundwork for further refining triage and risk stratification tools for patients with nonspecific complaints. More research, informed by whether the goal of a model is high sensitivity or high specificity, is needed to develop readily applicable clinical decision support tools (e.g., decision trees) that could be supported by electronic health records.

[1]  Max Kuhn,et al.  Applied Predictive Modeling , 2013 .

[2]  J. Gillet,et al.  Epidemiological profile of geriatric patients admitted to the emergency department of a university hospital localized in a rural area , 2001, European journal of emergency medicine : official journal of the European Society for Emergency Medicine.

[3]  Leo Breiman,et al.  Random Forests , 2001, Machine Learning.

[4]  Jan K. Woike,et al.  Correlates of Diagnostic Accuracy in Patients with Nonspecific Complaints , 2013, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[5]  G. Tutz,et al.  An introduction to recursive partitioning: rationale, application, and characteristics of classification and regression trees, bagging, and random forests. , 2009, Psychological methods.

[6]  Carolin Strobl,et al.  An AUC-based permutation variable importance measure for random forests , 2013, BMC Bioinformatics.

[7]  Achim Zeileis,et al.  BMC Bioinformatics BioMed Central Methodology article Conditional variable importance for random forests , 2008 .

[8]  Pat Croskerry,et al.  From mindless to mindful practice--cognitive bias and clinical decision making. , 2013, The New England journal of medicine.

[9]  L. Lind,et al.  The Emergency Department presenting complaint as predictor of in-hospital fatality , 2007, European journal of emergency medicine : official journal of the European Society for Emergency Medicine.

[10]  R. Tibshirani,et al.  Penalized Discriminant Analysis , 1995 .

[11]  C. Karrer,et al.  Patients presenting to the emergency department with non-specific complaints: the Basel Non-specific Complaints (BANC) study. , 2010, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

[12]  W. Lim,et al.  Defining community acquired pneumonia severity on presentation to hospital: an international derivation and validation study , 2003, Thorax.

[13]  D. Eitel,et al.  Reliability and validity of a new five-level triage instrument. , 2000, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

[14]  Peter Bühlmann,et al.  MissForest - non-parametric missing value imputation for mixed-type data , 2011, Bioinform..

[15]  Pedro M. Domingos A few useful things to know about machine learning , 2012, Commun. ACM.

[16]  R. Bingisser,et al.  Clinical intuition ratings are associated with morbidity and hospitalisation , 2015, International journal of clinical practice.

[17]  R. Somasundaram,et al.  Chief complaints in medical emergencies: do they relate to underlying disease and outcome? The Charité Emergency Medicine Study (CHARITEM) , 2013, European journal of emergency medicine : official journal of the European Society for Emergency Medicine.

[18]  Zhu-Hong You,et al.  Prediction of protein-protein interactions from amino acid sequences with ensemble extreme learning machines and principal component analysis , 2013, BMC Bioinformatics.

[19]  C. Beigelman,et al.  Acute respiratory failure in the elderly: etiology, emergency diagnosis and prognosis , 2006, Critical care.

[20]  Leo Breiman,et al.  Classification and Regression Trees , 1984 .