Bridging Organizational Structure and Information System Architecture Through Process

Because the architecture of an enterprise information system determines relations of its individual parts with its surrounding environment, an effective use of an information system (IS) requires, apart from other things, its painless integration into the enterprise management system. The IS architecture can be seen by different angles. The focus of this paper is in particular on the application architecture of an IS. The reason for analyzing organizational structure modeling approaches and IS architecture is to eliminate common semantic gaps between the languages used by IS users and designers. The architectural design of enterprise IS might be tightly interconnected with enterprise organizational architecture. However, in reality, architectural models of enterprise IS are not fairly understandable for users. For both of these architectural models the orientation on processes often is a joint base. Thus, process approach can prospectively bridge existing gaps between enterprise organizational models and IS architectures. In coherence with that goal the paper presents methodological aspects of how cross-organizational process support can be effectively used for designing the first stage of information system.

[1]  Hubert Österle,et al.  Business in the Information Age: Heading for New Processes , 1995 .

[2]  Göran Goldkuhl,et al.  Towards an integral understanding of organizations and information systems: Convergence of three theories , 2002 .

[3]  Vladimír Modrák Evaluation of Structural Properties for Business Processes , 2004, ICEIS.

[4]  Donna B. Stoddard,et al.  Reengineering: Business Change of Mythic Proportions? , 1994, MIS Q..

[5]  Thomas Hess,et al.  Methods for Business Process Redesign: Current State and Development Perspectives , 1996 .

[6]  K.S.S. Iyer,et al.  Tool life with speed and time dependent failures , 1981 .

[7]  Hubert Österle,et al.  Business in the Information Age , 1995 .

[8]  MylopoulosJohn,et al.  Towards requirements-driven information systems engineering , 2002 .

[9]  Thomas J. Crowe,et al.  Quantitative risk level estimation of business process reengineering efforts , 2002, Bus. Process. Manag. J..

[10]  Andrew N. Baldwin,et al.  Analytical design planning technique (ADePT): a dependency structure matrix tool to schedule the building design process , 2000 .

[11]  John Mylopoulos,et al.  Towards requirements-driven information systems engineering: the Tropos project , 2002, Inf. Syst..

[12]  Delvin Grant,et al.  A wider view of business process reengineering , 2002, CACM.

[13]  A. Sohal,et al.  Business process reengineering: Application and success - An Australian study , 1998 .

[14]  James A. Brickley,et al.  Managerial Economics and Organizational Architecture , 1996 .

[15]  K. Kosanke,et al.  CIMOSA modelling processes , 1999 .

[16]  D. Tranfield,et al.  Factors characterising the maturity of BPR programmes , 2003 .

[17]  André Vasconcelos,et al.  Information System Architecture Evaluation: From Software to Enterprise Level Approaches , 2005 .

[18]  John A. Zachman,et al.  A Framework for Information Systems Architecture , 1987, IBM Syst. J..

[19]  Mikael Lind,et al.  Contextual Understanding of Information Systems - Characteristics of Process Oriented Information Systems , 2005 .