Solution structure of family 21 carbohydrate-binding module from Rhizopus oryzae glucoamylase.

CBMs (carbohydrate-binding modules) function independently to assist carbohydrate-active enzymes. Family 21 CBMs contain approx. 100 amino acid residues, and some members have starchbinding functions or glycogen-binding activities. We report here the first structure of a family 21 CBM from the SBD (starch-binding domain) of Rhizopus oryzae glucoamylase (RoCBM21) determined by NMR spectroscopy. This CBM has a beta-sandwich fold with an immunoglobulin-like structure. Ligand-binding properties of RoCBM21 were analysed by chemical-shift perturbations and automated docking. Structural comparisons with previously reported SBDs revealed two types of topologies, namely type I and type II, with CBM20, CBM25, CBM26 and CBM41 showing type I topology, with CBM21 and CBM34 showing type II topology. According to the chemical-shift perturbations, RoCBM21 contains two ligand-binding sites. Residues in site II are similar to those found in the family 20 CBM from Aspergillus niger glucoamylase (AnCBM20). Site I, however, is embedded in a region with unique sequence motifs only found in some members of CBM21s. Additionally, docking of beta-cyclodextrin and malto-oligosaccharides highlights that side chains of Y83 and W47 (one-letter amino acid code) form the central part of the conserved binding platform in the SBD. The structure of RoCBM21 provides the first direct evidence of the structural features and the basis for protein-carbohydrate recognition from an SBD of CBM21.

[1]  D. S. Garrett,et al.  Identification by NMR of the binding surface for the histidine-containing phosphocarrier protein HPr on the N-terminal domain of enzyme I of the Escherichia coli phosphotransferase system. , 1997, Biochemistry.

[2]  N. Jullian,et al.  Structure of the human glycogen‐associated protein phosphatase 1 regulatory subunit hGM: Homology modeling revealed an (α/β)8‐barrel‐like fold in the multidomain protein , 1999, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[3]  S. Kamitori,et al.  Complex structures of Thermoactinomyces vulgaris R-47 alpha-amylase 1 with malto-oligosaccharides demonstrate the role of domain N acting as a starch-binding domain. , 2004, Journal of molecular biology.

[4]  G. Habermehl,et al.  ReviewPure appl. Chem: Rinehart, K. L., et al. Marine natural products as sources of antiviral, antimicrobial, and antineoplastic Agents. 53, 795 (1981). (K. L. Rinehart, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801, U.S.A.) , 1983 .

[5]  N. Juge,et al.  Both binding sites of the starch-binding domain of Aspergillus niger glucoamylase are essential for inducing a conformational change in amylose. , 2001, Journal of molecular biology.

[6]  S. Grzesiek,et al.  Direct Observation of Hydrogen Bonds in Proteins by Interresidue 3hJNC' Scalar Couplings , 1999 .

[7]  L. Kay,et al.  Gradient-Enhanced Triple-Resonance Three-Dimensional NMR Experiments with Improved Sensitivity , 1994 .

[8]  Paul A. Keifer,et al.  Pure absorption gradient enhanced heteronuclear single quantum correlation spectroscopy with improved sensitivity , 1992 .

[9]  C. Martin,et al.  What Controls the Amount and Structure of Starch in Storage Organs? , 1995, Plant physiology.

[10]  Š. Janeček,et al.  A new clan of CBM families based on bioinformatics of starch‐binding domains from families CBM20 and CBM21 , 2005, The FEBS journal.

[11]  Gary Williamson,et al.  The starch‐binding domain from glucoamylase disrupts the structure of starch , 1999, FEBS letters.

[12]  J. M. Dow,et al.  Biofilm formation and dispersal in Xanthomonas campestris. , 2004, Microbes and infection.

[13]  Mark J Howard,et al.  Protein NMR spectroscopy , 1998, Current Biology.

[14]  D. Bolam,et al.  Importance of hydrophobic and polar residues in ligand binding in the family 15 carbohydrate-binding module from Cellvibrio japonicus Xyn10C. , 2003, Biochemistry.

[15]  P. Wright,et al.  Sensitivity improvement in proton-detected two-dimensional heteronuclear correlation NMR spectroscopy , 1991 .

[16]  A. Gronenborn,et al.  Determination of three‐dimensional structures of proteins from interproton distance data by dynamical simulated annealing from a random array of atoms Circumventing problems associated with folding , 1988, FEBS letters.

[17]  J H Lakey,et al.  Role of hydrogen bonding in the interaction between a xylan binding module and xylan. , 2001, Biochemistry.

[18]  V. Saudek,et al.  Gradient-tailored excitation for single-quantum NMR spectroscopy of aqueous solutions , 1992, Journal of biomolecular NMR.

[19]  A. Dehner,et al.  NMR Chemical Shift Perturbation Study of the N‐Terminal Domain of Hsp90 upon Binding of ADP, AMP‐PNP, Geldanamycin, and Radicicol , 2003, Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology.

[20]  C. Griesinger,et al.  Coherence Selection by Gradients without Signal Attenuation: Application to the Three‐Dimensional HNCO Experiment , 1993 .

[21]  Vladimir Sklenar,et al.  Gradient-Tailored Water Suppression for 1H-15N HSQC Experiments Optimized to Retain Full Sensitivity , 1993 .

[22]  Hye-Jin Yoon,et al.  Crystal structure of pullulanase: evidence for parallel binding of oligosaccharides in the active site. , 2006, Journal of molecular biology.

[23]  J. Thornton,et al.  PROCHECK: a program to check the stereochemical quality of protein structures , 1993 .

[24]  M. Williamson,et al.  Rapid-pulsing artifacts in double-quantum-filtered COSY , 1990 .

[25]  A. Bacher,et al.  Transcriptional regulation by antitermination. Interaction of RNA with NusB protein and NusB/NusE protein complex of Escherichia coli. , 2002, Journal of molecular biology.

[26]  K. Sorimachi,et al.  Function of conserved tryptophans in the Aspergillus niger glucoamylase 1 starch binding domain. , 1997, Biochemistry.

[27]  Carolyn R. Bertozzi,et al.  Essentials of Glycobiology , 1999 .

[28]  H Oschkinat,et al.  Automated NOESY interpretation with ambiguous distance restraints: the refined NMR solution structure of the pleckstrin homology domain from beta-spectrin. , 1997, Journal of molecular biology.

[29]  David S. Goodsell,et al.  Automated docking using a Lamarckian genetic algorithm and an empirical binding free energy function , 1998, J. Comput. Chem..

[30]  G. Sheldrick,et al.  V-Amylose at atomic resolution: X-ray structure of a cycloamylose with 26 glucose residues (cyclomaltohexaicosaose). , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[31]  B. Henrissat,et al.  Structural enzymology of carbohydrate-active enzymes: implications for the post-genomic era. , 2001, Biochemical Society transactions.

[32]  David S. Goodsell,et al.  Automated docking using a Lamarckian genetic algorithm and an empirical binding free energy function , 1998 .

[33]  P. Simpson,et al.  Trp22, Trp24, and Tyr8 play a pivotal role in the binding of the family 10 cellulose-binding module from Pseudomonas xylanase A to insoluble ligands. , 2000, Biochemistry.

[34]  S. Grzesiek,et al.  Improved 3D triple-resonance NMR techniques applied to a 31 kDa protein , 1992 .

[35]  H. Kaback,et al.  Aromatic stacking in the sugar binding site of the lactose permease. , 2003, Biochemistry.

[36]  L. Kay,et al.  Enhanced-Sensitivity Triple-Resonance Spectroscopy with Minimal H2O Saturation , 1994 .

[37]  A. Boraston,et al.  A Structural and Functional Analysis of α-Glucan Recognition by Family 25 and 26 Carbohydrate-binding Modules Reveals a Conserved Mode of Starch Recognition* , 2006, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[38]  K. Sorimachi,et al.  GLUCOAMYLASE, GRANULAR STARCH-BINDING DOMAIN, NMR, 5 STRUCTURES , 1996 .

[39]  C G Armstrong,et al.  Identification of the separate domains in the hepatic glycogen-targeting subunit of protein phosphatase 1 that interact with phosphorylase a, glycogen and protein phosphatase 1. , 1998, The Biochemical journal.

[40]  Barry Honig,et al.  Extending the Applicability of the Nonlinear Poisson−Boltzmann Equation: Multiple Dielectric Constants and Multivalent Ions† , 2001 .

[41]  G. Montelione,et al.  Assignment validation software suite for the evaluation and presentation of protein resonance assignment data , 2004, Journal of biomolecular NMR.

[42]  G. Kelly The role of glucosamine sulfate and chondroitin sulfates in the treatment of degenerative joint disease. , 1998, Alternative medicine review : a journal of clinical therapeutic.

[43]  P. Simpson,et al.  Pseudomonas cellulose-binding domains mediate their effects by increasing enzyme substrate proximity. , 1998, The Biochemical journal.

[44]  M. Nilges,et al.  Refinement of protein structures in explicit solvent , 2003, Proteins.

[45]  M. Goto,et al.  Analysis of the raw starch-binding domain by mutation of a glucoamylase from Aspergillus awamori var. kawachi expressed in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 1994, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[46]  L. Kay,et al.  Two-dimensional NMR experiments for correlating carbon-13.beta. and proton.delta./.epsilon. chemical shifts of aromatic residues in 13C-labeled proteins via scalar couplings , 1993 .

[47]  B. Henrissat,et al.  A census of carbohydrate-active enzymes in the genome of Arabidopsis thaliana , 2004, Plant Molecular Biology.

[48]  Y. Nagai Cell regulatory function of glycophingolipids: carbohydrate recognition and biosignaling , 1998 .

[49]  K. Kato,et al.  Different behavior towards raw starch of three forms of glucoamylase from a Rhizopus sp. , 1985, Journal of biochemistry.

[50]  P. Dent,et al.  The molecular mechanism by which insulin stimulates glycogen synthesis in mammalian skeletal muscle , 1990, Nature.

[51]  R. A. Norman,et al.  A common variant in PPP1R3 associated with insulin resistance and type 2 diabetes. , 1998, Diabetes.

[52]  M. Wittekind,et al.  HNCACB, a High-Sensitivity 3D NMR Experiment to Correlate Amide-Proton and Nitrogen Resonances with the Alpha- and Beta-Carbon Resonances in Proteins , 1993 .

[53]  A. Bax,et al.  Protein backbone angle restraints from searching a database for chemical shift and sequence homology , 1999, Journal of biomolecular NMR.

[54]  S. Grzesiek,et al.  The solution structure of HIV-1 Nef reveals an unexpected fold and permits delineation of the binding surface for the SH3 domain of Hck tyrosine protein kinase , 1996, Nature Structural Biology.

[55]  D. Bolam,et al.  Carbohydrate-binding modules: fine-tuning polysaccharide recognition. , 2004, The Biochemical journal.

[56]  Y. Matsuura,et al.  Three-dimensional structure of Pseudomonas isoamylase at 2.2 A resolution. , 1998, Journal of molecular biology.

[57]  Ad Bax,et al.  Amino acid type determination in the sequential assignment procedure of uniformly 13C/15N-enriched proteins , 1993, Journal of biomolecular NMR.

[58]  J. Prestegard,et al.  Structural perturbations in human ADP ribosylation factor-1 accompanying the binding of phosphatidylinositides. , 2004, Biochemistry.

[59]  Tun-Wen Pai,et al.  The family 21 carbohydrate-binding module of glucoamylase from Rhizopus oryzae consists of two sites playing distinct roles in ligand binding. , 2006, The Biochemical journal.