Political ideology affects energy-efficiency attitudes and choices

This research demonstrates how promoting the environment can negatively affect adoption of energy efficiency in the United States because of the political polarization surrounding environmental issues. Study 1 demonstrated that more politically conservative individuals were less in favor of investment in energy-efficient technology than were those who were more politically liberal. This finding was driven primarily by the lessened psychological value that more conservative individuals placed on reducing carbon emissions. Study 2 showed that this difference has consequences: In a real-choice context, more conservative individuals were less likely to purchase a more expensive energy-efficient light bulb when it was labeled with an environmental message than when it was unlabeled. These results highlight the importance of taking into account psychological value-based considerations in the individual adoption of energy-efficient technology in the United States and beyond.

[1]  Darren W. Dahl,et al.  Are All Out-Groups Created Equal? Consumer Identity and Dissociative Influence , 2007 .

[2]  L. Hooghe,et al.  Does Left/Right Structure Party Positions on European Integration? , 2002 .

[3]  Vladas Griskevicius,et al.  INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS AND GROUP PROCESSES Going Green to Be Seen : Status , Reputation , and Conspicuous Conservation , 2010 .

[4]  Geoffrey L. Cohen,et al.  Party over policy: The dominating impact of group influence on political beliefs. , 2003, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[5]  Leaf Van Boven,et al.  Political polarization projection: social projection of partisan attitude extremity and attitudinal processes. , 2012, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[6]  G. T. Gardner,et al.  Household actions can provide a behavioral wedge to rapidly reduce US carbon emissions , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[7]  S. Schwartz,et al.  Toward A Universal Psychological Structure of Human Values , 1987 .

[8]  David A. Savage,et al.  Identity Economics: How our Identities Shape our Work, Wages, and Well‐being , 2011 .

[9]  A. Jaffe,et al.  The energy paradox and the diffusion of conservation technology , 1994 .

[10]  E. Weber,et al.  Public Understanding of Climate Change in the United States Scientific Understanding of Climate Change These Assess- Ments Support the following Conclusions with High Or , 2011 .

[11]  Daniel M. Oppenheimer,et al.  Instructional Manipulation Checks: Detecting Satisficing to Increase Statistical Power , 2009 .

[12]  A. McCright,et al.  The Politicization of Climate Change and Polarization in the American Public's Views of Global Warming, 2001–2010 , 2011 .

[13]  John A. Glaser,et al.  Environmental values , 2008 .

[14]  G. Caprara,et al.  Basic Personal Values, Core Political Values, and Voting: A Longitudinal Analysis , 2010 .

[15]  Aaron M. McCright,et al.  Cool dudes: The denial of climate change among conservative white males in the United States , 2011 .

[16]  R. J. Bord,et al.  Risk Perceptions, General Environmental Beliefs, and Willingness to Address Climate Change , 1999 .

[17]  Jaime L. Napier,et al.  Political ideology: its structure, functions, and elective affinities. , 2009, Annual review of psychology.

[18]  Hunt Allcott,et al.  Consumers' Perceptions and Misperceptions of Energy Costs , 2011 .

[19]  Rachel E. Goldsmith,et al.  System Justification, the Denial of Global Warming, and the Possibility of “System-Sanctioned Change” , 2010, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[20]  Chip Heath,et al.  Who Drives Divergence? Identity-Signaling, Outgroup Dissimilarity, and the Abandonment of Cultural Tastes , 2008, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[21]  Richard P. Larrick,et al.  The MPG Illusion , 2008, Science.

[22]  John G. Lynch,et al.  Spotlights, Floodlights, and the Magic Number Zero: Simple Effects Tests in Moderated Regression , 2012 .

[23]  J. Brockner,et al.  Value from hedonic experience and engagement. , 2006, Psychological review.

[24]  D. O. Sears,et al.  The Oxford handbook of political psychology , 2013 .

[25]  D. C. Seyle,et al.  A house divided? The psychology of red and blue America. , 2006, The American psychologist.

[26]  H. Allcott,et al.  Is There an Energy Efficiency Gap? , 2012 .

[27]  Eldar Shafir,et al.  The Conflicting Choices of Alternating Selves , 2010 .

[28]  K. Knight,et al.  Transformations of the Concept of Ideology in the Twentieth Century , 2006, American Political Science Review.

[29]  Kristopher J Preacher,et al.  Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models , 2008, Behavior research methods.

[30]  Cathy L. Hartman,et al.  Avoiding Green Marketing Myopia: Ways to Improve Consumer Appeal for Environmentally Preferable Products , 2006 .

[31]  James G. March,et al.  A primer on decision making : how decisions happen , 1994 .

[32]  Andrew F. Hayes,et al.  Computational procedures for probing interactions in OLS and logistic regression: SPSS and SAS implementations , 2009, Behavior research methods.

[33]  Mark Van Vugt,et al.  Averting the Tragedy of the Commons , 2009 .

[34]  Elke U. Weber,et al.  A Dirty Word or a Dirty World? , 2010, Psychological science.

[35]  Rachel E. Kranton,et al.  Identity Economics: How Our Identities Shape Our Work, Wages, and Well-Being , 2010 .

[36]  A. McCright,et al.  Politics and Environment in America: Partisan and Ideological Cleavages in Public Support for Environmentalism , 2001 .

[37]  S. Mullainathan,et al.  Behavior and Energy Policy , 2010, Science.

[38]  Brian A. Nosek,et al.  Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations. , 2009, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[39]  Lyle Scruggs,et al.  Declining public concern about climate change : Can we blame the great recession ? , 2012 .

[40]  Robb Willer,et al.  The Moral Roots of Environmental Attitudes , 2013, Psychological science.

[41]  Howard Kunreuther,et al.  Chapter 23. Overcoming Decision Biases to Reduce Losses from Natural Catastrophes , 2013 .

[42]  M. Dekay,et al.  Public perceptions of energy consumption and savings , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.