Molecular origin of constant m-values, denatured state collapse, and residue-dependent transition midpoints in globular proteins.

Experiments show that for many two-state folders the free energy of the native state, DeltaG(ND)([C]), changes linearly as the denaturant concentration, [C], is varied. The slope {m = [dDeltaG(ND)([C])]/(d[C])}, is nearly constant. According to the transfer model, the m-value is associated with the difference in the surface area between the native (N) and denatured (D) state, which should be a function of DeltaR(g)(2), the difference in the square of the radius of gyration between the D and N states. Single-molecule experiments show that the R(g) of the structurally heterogeneous denatured state undergoes an equilibrium collapse transition as [C] decreases, which implies m also should be [C]-dependent. We resolve the conundrum between constant m-values and [C]-dependent changes in R(g) using molecular simulations of a coarse-grained representation of protein L, and the molecular transfer model, for which the equilibrium folding can be accurately calculated as a function of denaturant (urea) concentration. In agreement with experiment, we find that over a large range of denaturant concentration (>3 M) the m-value is a constant, whereas under strongly renaturing conditions (<3 M), it depends on [C]. The m-value is a constant above [C] > 3 M because the [C]-dependent changes in the surface area of the backbone groups, which make the largest contribution to m, are relatively narrow in the denatured state. The burial of the backbone and hydrophobic side chains gives rise to substantial surface area changes below [C] < 3 M, leading to collapse in the denatured state of protein L. Dissection of the contribution of various amino acids to the total surface area change with [C] shows that both the sequence context and residual structure are important. There are [C]-dependent variations in the surface area for chemically identical groups such as the backbone or Ala. Consequently, the midpoints of transition of individual residues vary significantly (which we call the Holtzer effect) even though global folding can be described as an all-or-none transition. The collapse is specific in nature, resulting in the formation of compact structures with appreciable populations of nativelike secondary structural elements. The collapse transition is driven by the loss of favorable residue-solvent interactions and a concomitant increase in the strength of intrapeptide interactions with a decreasing [C]. The strength of these interactions is nonuniformly distributed throughout the structure of protein L. Certain secondary structure elements have stronger [C]-dependent interactions than others in the denatured state.

[1]  Guy Ziv,et al.  Protein folding, protein collapse, and tanford's transfer model: lessons from single-molecule FRET. , 2009, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[2]  R. Pappu,et al.  Atomistic simulations of the effects of polyglutamine chain length and solvent quality on conformational equilibria and spontaneous homodimerization. , 2008, Journal of molecular biology.

[3]  Ruhong Zhou,et al.  Urea denaturation by stronger dispersion interactions with proteins than water implies a 2-stage unfolding , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[4]  B. Brooks,et al.  Effects of denaturants and osmolytes on proteins are accurately predicted by the molecular transfer model , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[5]  D. W. Bolen,et al.  Anatomy of energetic changes accompanying urea-induced protein denaturation , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[6]  E. Kondrashkina,et al.  Microsecond Hydrophobic Collapse in the Folding of Escherichia coli Dihydrofolate Reductase, an α/β-Type Protein , 2007 .

[7]  W. Eaton,et al.  Characterizing the unfolded states of proteins using single-molecule FRET spectroscopy and molecular simulations , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[8]  K. Lindorff-Larsen,et al.  BPPred: A Web‐based computational tool for predicting biophysical parameters of proteins , 2006, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[9]  R. Seckler,et al.  Mapping protein collapse with single-molecule fluorescence and kinetic synchrotron radiation circular dichroism spectroscopy , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[10]  G. Rose,et al.  A molecular mechanism for osmolyte-induced protein stability , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[11]  Hoang T. Tran,et al.  Toward an accurate theoretical framework for describing ensembles for proteins under strongly denaturing conditions. , 2006, Biophysical journal.

[12]  Eilon Sherman,et al.  Coil-globule transition in the denatured state of a small protein. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  Victor Muñoz,et al.  Atom-by-atom analysis of global downhill protein folding , 2006, Nature.

[14]  Eugene Shakhnovich,et al.  Protein folding thermodynamics and dynamics: where physics, chemistry, and biology meet. , 2006, Chemical reviews.

[15]  C. Matthews,et al.  Molecular dimensions and their distributions in early folding intermediates. , 2006, Current opinion in structural biology.

[16]  J. Udgaonkar,et al.  Dependence of the size of the initially collapsed form during the refolding of barstar on denaturant concentration: evidence for a continuous transition. , 2005, Journal of molecular biology.

[17]  D. W. Bolen,et al.  Predicting the energetics of osmolyte-induced protein folding/unfolding. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[18]  G. Ulrich Nienhaus,et al.  Single-molecule Förster resonance energy transfer study of protein dynamics under denaturing conditions , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[19]  D. Thirumalai,et al.  Finite size effects on thermal denaturation of globular proteins. , 2004, Physical review letters.

[20]  D. W. Bolen,et al.  Additive transfer free energies of the peptide backbone unit that are independent of the model compound and the choice of concentration scale. , 2004, Biochemistry.

[21]  Margaret S. Cheung,et al.  Exploring the Interplay between Topology and Secondary Structural Formation in the Protein Folding Problem , 2003 .

[22]  Doug Barrick,et al.  Measuring the stability of partly folded proteins using TMAO , 2003, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[23]  T. Keiderling,et al.  Spectroscopic studies of structural changes in two beta-sheet-forming peptides show an ensemble of structures that unfold noncooperatively. , 2003, Biochemistry.

[24]  V. Pande,et al.  Multiplexed-replica exchange molecular dynamics method for protein folding simulation. , 2003, Biophysical journal.

[25]  Lorna J. Smith,et al.  Long-Range Interactions Within a Nonnative Protein , 2002, Science.

[26]  D. Thirumalai,et al.  Is there a unique melting temperature for two‐state proteins? , 2002, J. Comput. Chem..

[27]  H. Scheraga,et al.  Distributions of intramolecular distances in the reduced and denatured states of bovine pancreatic ribonuclease A. Folding initiation structures in the C-terminal portions of the reduced protein. , 2001, Biochemistry.

[28]  D Baker,et al.  A breakdown of symmetry in the folding transition state of protein L. , 2000, Journal of molecular biology.

[29]  D Thirumalai,et al.  Mechanisms and kinetics of beta-hairpin formation. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[30]  Y. Sugita,et al.  Replica-exchange molecular dynamics method for protein folding , 1999 .

[31]  D. Baker,et al.  Chain collapse can occur concomitantly with the rate-limiting step in protein folding , 1999, Nature Structural Biology.

[32]  G. Makhatadze THERMODYNAMICS OF PROTEIN INTERACTIONS WITH UREA AND GUANIDINIUM HYDROCHLORIDE , 1999 .

[33]  D. Thirumalai,et al.  Deciphering the timescales and mechanisms of protein folding using minimal off-lattice models. , 1999, Current opinion in structural biology.

[34]  I. Baskakov,et al.  Monitoring the sizes of denatured ensembles of staphylococcal nuclease proteins: implications regarding m values, intermediates, and thermodynamics. , 1998, Biochemistry.

[35]  C. Brooks,et al.  Exploring the space of protein folding Hamiltonians: The balance of forces in a minimalist β-barrel model , 1998 .

[36]  S. Jackson,et al.  How do small single-domain proteins fold? , 1998, Folding & design.

[37]  D Thirumalai,et al.  Cooperativity in protein folding: from lattice models with sidechains to real proteins. , 1998, Folding & design.

[38]  Michelle L. Scalley,et al.  Characterization of the free energy spectrum of peptostreptococcal protein L. , 1997, Folding & design.

[39]  A. Holtzer,et al.  Thermal unfolding in a GCN4-like leucine zipper: 13C alpha NMR chemical shifts and local unfolding curves. , 1997, Biophysical journal.

[40]  D Baker,et al.  Kinetics of folding of the IgG binding domain of peptostreptococcal protein L. , 1997, Biochemistry.

[41]  D. Thirumalai,et al.  Protein folding kinetics: timescales, pathways and energy landscapes in terms of sequence-dependent properties. , 1996, Folding & design.

[42]  L. Regan,et al.  Surface point mutations that significantly alter the structure and stability of a protein's denatured state , 1996, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[43]  H. Orland,et al.  Partially folded states of proteins: characterization by X-ray scattering. , 1995, Journal of molecular biology.

[44]  P. Argos,et al.  Knowledge‐based protein secondary structure assignment , 1995, Proteins.

[45]  Y. Thériault,et al.  Structural characterization of the FK506 binding protein unfolded in urea and guanidine hydrochloride. , 1994, Journal of molecular biology.

[46]  S. Khorasanizadeh,et al.  Folding and stability of a tryptophan-containing mutant of ubiquitin. , 1993, Biochemistry.

[47]  R. Swendsen,et al.  THE weighted histogram analysis method for free‐energy calculations on biomolecules. I. The method , 1992 .

[48]  M M Santoro,et al.  A test of the linear extrapolation of unfolding free energy changes over an extended denaturant concentration range. , 1992, Biochemistry.

[49]  A. Fersht,et al.  Folding of chymotrypsin inhibitor 2. 1. Evidence for a two-state transition. , 1991, Biochemistry.

[50]  B. Nall,et al.  Effective concentrations of amino acid side chains in an unfolded protein. , 1991, Biochemistry.

[51]  Alan M. Ferrenberg,et al.  Optimized Monte Carlo data analysis. , 1989, Physical review letters.

[52]  D. W. Bolen,et al.  Unfolding free energy changes determined by the linear extrapolation method. 1. Unfolding of phenylmethanesulfonyl alpha-chymotrypsin using different denaturants. , 1988, Biochemistry.

[53]  G. Rose,et al.  Hydrophobicity of amino acid residues in globular proteins. , 1985, Science.

[54]  A. Zamyatnin,et al.  Amino acid, peptide, and protein volume in solution. , 1984, Annual review of biophysics and bioengineering.

[55]  M. Karplus,et al.  CHARMM: A program for macromolecular energy, minimization, and dynamics calculations , 1983 .

[56]  Pace Cn,et al.  Urea and guanidine hydrochloride denaturation of ribonuclease, lysozyme, alpha-chymotrypsin, and beta-lactoglobulin. , 1974, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[57]  Michael E. Fisher,et al.  Scaling Theory for Finite-Size Effects in the Critical Region , 1972 .

[58]  B. Lee,et al.  The interpretation of protein structures: estimation of static accessibility. , 1971, Journal of molecular biology.

[59]  Charles Tanford,et al.  Isothermal Unfolding of Globular Proteins in Aqueous Urea Solutions , 1964 .

[60]  C. Tanford,et al.  THE SOLUBILITY OF AMINO ACIDS AND RELATED COMPOUNDS IN AQUEOUS UREA SOLUTIONS. , 1963, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[61]  D. W. Bolen,et al.  Application of the transfer model to understand how naturally occurring osmolytes affect protein stability. , 2007, Methods in enzymology.

[62]  A. C. Ferreon,et al.  Structural thermodynamics of a random coil protein in guanidine hydrochloride , 2000, Proteins.

[63]  A. R. Fresht Structure and Mechanism in Protein Science: A Guide to Enzyme Catalysis and Protein Folding , 1999 .

[64]  C. Pace Determination and analysis of urea and guanidine hydrochloride denaturation curves. , 1986, Methods in enzymology.

[65]  D Baker,et al.  Biological Crystallography Structures of the B1 Domain of Protein L from Peptostreptococcus Magnus with a Tyrosine to Tryptophan Substitution , 2022 .