The use of geistlich mucograft seal and geistlich bio-oss membranes in the post-exodontial alveolar sealing clinical case report

The loss of tissue after a tooth extraction is a physiological process and is more pronounced during the first 3 to 6 months after extraction, followed by great reabsorption throughout the patient’s life, both horizontal and vertical.1–3 The chronological sequence of the biological events that occur during alveolar healing results in reabsorption of the alveolar crest.4 The dental extraction initiates a series of repair processes involving hard tissue (alveolar bone) and soft tissues (periodontal ligament and gingiva). It occurs filling the alveolus with blood clot, then by a slow process of remodeling that results in the formation of new bone inside it.5 Healing of the alveolus is characterized by internal and external changes. When waiting for the natural time of healing can occur the formation of bone within the alveolus, even with this condition, alveolar process is lost in height and width.6 Alveolar preservation is a procedure performed to minimize alveolar resorption and increase bone formation at the extraction site.1‒9 Adequate bone volume is required to provide satisfactory esthetics and positive results over a long period of time after the installation of osseointegrated implants.3 The simple placement of the graft material into the extraction cavity significantly reduces the size changes of the alveolar bone.9 It is possible to preserve the alveolar bone crest with the filling of biomaterials, as bone substitutes and, also, membranes for the formation of a barrier of the material grafted with the buccal cavity, obtaining great results in the cicatrization.4,8 The placement of bone substitutes into the fresh alveolus may have a positive effect on healing and prevents atrophy of the alveolar bone.3 The purpose of this study was to evaluate the membrane, Geistlich Mucograft Seal®, used for the post-extraction alveolar sealing together with Geistlich Bio-Oss®. Case presentation

[1]  K. Schlegel,et al.  Long-term outcomes after vestibuloplasty with a porcine collagen matrix (Mucograft® ) versus the free gingival graft: a comparative prospective clinical trial. , 2016, Clinical oral implants research.

[2]  G. Giraddi,et al.  Clinical use of the resorbable bioscaffold poly lactic co-glycolic acid (PLGA) in post-extraction socket for maintaining the alveolar height: A prospective study. , 2016, Journal of oral biology and craniofacial research.

[3]  E. Galliera,et al.  Alveolar socket preservation technique: Effect of biomaterial on bone regenerative pattern. , 2016, Annals of anatomy = Anatomischer Anzeiger : official organ of the Anatomische Gesellschaft.

[4]  Luda Feng,et al.  Clinical evaluations of mineralized collagen in the extraction sites preservation , 2016, Regenerative biomaterials.

[5]  J. Whetman Effect of Healing Time on New Bone Formation Following Tooth Extraction and Ridge Preservation with Demineralized Freeze-Dried Bone Allograft , 2016 .

[6]  C. Masaki,et al.  Strategies for alveolar ridge reconstruction and preservation for implant therapy. , 2015, Journal of prosthodontic research.

[7]  Avinash S. Bidra,et al.  Clinical and histologic outcomes of socket grafting after flapless tooth extraction: a systematic review of randomized controlled clinical trials. , 2015, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[8]  R. Palmer,et al.  Bone healing after tooth extraction with or without an intervention: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. , 2014, Clinical implant dentistry and related research.

[9]  S. Elangovan,et al.  Quality assessment of systematic reviews on alveolar ridge preservation. , 2013, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[10]  Behnam Shakibaie-M Comparison of the effectiveness of two different bone substitute materials for socket preservation after tooth extraction: a controlled clinical study. , 2013, The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry.

[11]  C. Bourauel,et al.  Bone level change of extraction sockets with Bio-Oss collagen and implant placement: a clinical study. , 2012, Annals of anatomy = Anatomischer Anzeiger : official organ of the Anatomische Gesellschaft.

[12]  S. Ghanaati,et al.  Bovine pericardium based non-cross linked collagen matrix for successful root coverage, a clinical study in human , 2012, Head & Face Medicine.

[13]  M. Sanz,et al.  Surgical protocols for ridge preservation after tooth extraction. A systematic review. , 2012, Clinical oral implants research.

[14]  K. Ackermann Extraction site management using a natural bone mineral containing collagen: rationale and retrospective case study. , 2009, The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry.

[15]  J. Wennström,et al.  The influence of Bio-Oss Collagen on healing of an extraction socket: an experimental study in the dog. , 2008, The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry.

[16]  A. Wenzel,et al.  Bone healing and soft tissue contour changes following single-tooth extraction: a clinical and radiographic 12-month prospective study. , 2003, The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry.

[17]  P. Klokkevold,et al.  Preservation of alveolar bone in extraction sockets using bioabsorbable membranes. , 1998, Journal of periodontology.