Detection of apical root resorption after orthodontic treatment by using panoramic radiography and cone-beam computed tomography of super-high resolution.

INTRODUCTION Apical root resorption is an adverse side effect of orthodontic treatment. We compared panoramic radiography (OPT) with cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) in evaluating orthodontically induced apical root resorption. METHODS The study sample comprised 275 teeth in 22 patients near the end of orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances. Two calibrated examiners assessed blindly the presence or absence and the severity of apical root resorption on the OPT images after treatment and the corresponding reconstructed CBCT images. Resorption was evaluated as no, mild, moderate, severe, and extreme. RESULTS On the OPT images, 17 teeth (6.2%) could not be evaluated. Statistically significant differences were found between the 2 methods: 56.5% and 31% of the teeth showed no resorption by OPT and CBCT, respectively; 33.5% and 49% of the teeth showed mild resorption, whereas 8% and 19% showed moderate resorption by OPT and CBCT, respectively. Severe resorption was found in only 2 teeth by CBCT. CONCLUSIONS Apical root resorption after orthodontic tooth movement is underestimated when evaluated on OPT. CBCT might be a useful complementary diagnostic method to conventional radiography, to be applied when a decision on continuation or modification of the orthodontic treatment is necessary because of orthodontically induced root resorption.

[1]  O Malmgren,et al.  Evaluation of the risk of root resorption during orthodontic treatment: a study of upper incisors. , 1988, European journal of orthodontics.

[2]  D. Hatcher,et al.  Mesiodistal root angulation using panoramic and cone beam CT. , 2007, The Angle orthodontist.

[3]  Allan S. Jones,et al.  A new method for volumetric measurement of orthodontically induced root resorption craters. , 2004, European journal of oral sciences.

[4]  Robert A Danforth,et al.  Cone beam volume tomography: a new digital imaging option for dentistry. , 2003, Journal of the California Dental Association.

[5]  Christof Holberg,et al.  Cone-Beam Computed Tomography in Orthodontics: Benefits and Limitations , 2005, Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie.

[6]  X. Montet,et al.  Diagnostic accuracy of digitized periapical radiographs validated against micro-computed tomography scanning in evaluating orthodontically induced apical root resorption. , 2008, European journal of oral sciences.

[7]  M. Rohlin,et al.  Observer performance in the assessment of periapical pathology: a comparison of panoramic with periapical radiography. , 1991, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[8]  P Sukovic,et al.  Cone beam computed tomography in craniofacial imaging. , 2003, Orthodontics & craniofacial research.

[9]  J. Peltola,et al.  Apical root resorption after orthodontic treatment -- a retrospective study. , 2007, European journal of orthodontics.

[10]  G. Sameshima,et al.  Assessment of root resorption and root shape: periapical vs panoramic films. , 2009 .

[11]  Christopher J. Lux,et al.  Indications for Digital Volume Tomography in Orthodontics , 2005, Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie.

[12]  O. Kharbanda,et al.  Root resorption after orthodontic treatment , 2006, Australian orthodontic journal.

[13]  David C Hatcher,et al.  Diagnosis goes digital. , 2004, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[14]  J. A. P. de Figueiredo,et al.  Diagnostic ability of computed tomography to evaluate external root resorption in vitro. , 2007, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[15]  D. Lundgren,et al.  Continuous versus interrupted continuous orthodontic force related to early tooth movement and root resorption. , 1995, The Angle orthodontist.

[16]  S Hassfeld,et al.  Clinical application of cone beam digital volume tomography in children with cleft lip and palate. , 2006, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[17]  S Hassfeld,et al.  Geometric accuracy of the NewTom 9000 Cone Beam CT. , 2005, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[18]  J Brief,et al.  Clinical indications for digital volume tomography in oral and maxillofacial surgery. , 2002, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[19]  A. Farman,et al.  Clinical applications of cone-beam computed tomography in dental practice. , 2006, Journal.

[20]  Deng-Gao Liu,et al.  Localization of impacted maxillary canines and observation of adjacent incisor resorption with cone-beam computed tomography. , 2008, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics.

[21]  C. Lascala,et al.  Analysis of the accuracy of linear measurements obtained by cone beam computed tomography (CBCT-NewTom). , 2004, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[22]  W. K. Lobb,et al.  Three-dimensional localization of maxillary canines with cone-beam computed tomography , 2007 .