Bilinear approximations to the mode II delamination cohesive law using an inverse method

Abstract Cohesive zone modelling has proved to be a powerful tool to model delamination problems in high performance composites. Application to mode II delamination is of particular interest due to the large fracture process zone. In this paper, bilinear approximations to the mode II delamination cohesive law were determined for two carbon/epoxy composites. This was achieved by an inverse method that consisted of making Finite Element Analyses fit experimental load–displacement curves measured in well-known End-Notched Flexure tests. The optimal parameters of the bilinear cohesive law were determined by a genetic algorithm. The results showed the adequacy of the bilinear cohesive law and of the methodology employed.

[1]  José Morais,et al.  Comparison of fracture properties of two wood species through cohesive crack simulations , 2008 .

[2]  K. Alfredsson.  On the instantaneous energy release rate of the end-notch flexure adhesive joint specimen , 2004 .

[3]  V. Tamužs,et al.  Progressive delamination and fiber bridging modeling in double cantilever beam composite specimens , 2001 .

[4]  Barry D. Davidson,et al.  Effects of Friction, Geometry, and Fixture Compliance on the Perceived Toughness from Three-and Four-Point Bend End-Notched Flexure Tests , 2005 .

[5]  Andreas J. Brunner,et al.  Mode II fracture testing of composites: a new look at an old problem , 2006 .

[6]  Zbigniew Michalewicz,et al.  Genetic Algorithms + Data Structures = Evolution Programs , 2000, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[7]  A. T. Marques,et al.  Modeling Compression Failure after Low Velocity Impact on Laminated Composites Using Interface Elements , 1997 .

[8]  Peter Davies,et al.  A status report on delamination resistance testing of polymer-matrix composites , 2008 .

[9]  Ulf Stigh,et al.  Shear behaviour of adhesive layers , 2007 .

[10]  Sean S. Teller,et al.  Recommendations for an ASTM Standardized Test for Determining G IIc of Unidirectional Laminated Polymeric Matrix Composites , 2010 .

[11]  P. Petersson.  Crack growth and development of fracture zones in plain concrete and similar materials , 1981 .

[12]  Bent F. Sørensen,et al.  Characterizing delamination of fibre composites by mixed mode cohesive laws , 2009 .

[13]  M.F.S.F. de Moura,et al.  Equivalent crack based analyses of ENF and ELS tests , 2008 .

[14]  J. Botsis,et al.  Bridging tractions in mode I delamination: Measurements and simulations , 2008 .

[15]  Xuekun Sun,et al.  Geometry and Data Reduction Recommendations for a Standardized End Notched Flexure Test for Unidirectional Composites , 2006 .

[16]  José Morais,et al.  A new data reduction scheme for mode I wood fracture characterization using the double cantilever beam test , 2008 .

[17]  G. D. Sims,et al.  Comparison of test configurations for determination of mode II interlaminar fracture toughness results from international collaborative test programme , 1999 .

[18]  Zdeněk P. Bažant,et al.  Size-Effect Testing of Cohesive Fracture Parameters and Nonuniqueness of Work-of-Fracture Method , 2011 .

[19]  Barry D. Davidson,et al.  Evaluation of Precracking Methods for the End-Notched Flexure Test , 2007 .

[20]  Tove Jacobsen,et al.  Large scale bridging in compos-ites: R-curve and bridging laws , 1998 .

[21]  Bent F. Sørensen,et al.  Determination of cohesive laws by the J integral approach , 2003 .

[22]  Michael R Wisnom,et al.  Modelling discrete failures in composites with interface elements , 2010 .

[23]  A. Morais,et al.  Application of the effective crack method to mode I and mode II interlaminar fracture of carbon/epoxy unidirectional laminates , 2007 .