Noninvasive evaluation of cardiac allograft rejection by cellular and functional cardiac magnetic resonance.

OBJECTIVES We sought to use cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) to establish sensitive and reliable indexes for noninvasive detection of acute cardiac allograft rejection. BACKGROUND Appropriate surveillance for acute allograft rejection is vitally important for graft survival. The current gold standard for diagnosing and staging rejection after organ transplantation is endomyocardial biopsy, which is not only invasive but also prone to sampling errors. The motivation of this study is to establish a CMR-based alternative that is noninvasive and sensitive for early detection of allograft rejection before irreversible damage occurs. METHODS We employed a noninvasive 2-pronged approach to detect acute cardiac allograft rejection using a rodent working heart and lung transplantation model. We used CMR to detect immune-cell infiltration at sites of rejection by monitoring the accumulation of dextran-coated ultra-small superparamagnetic-iron-oxide-labeled immune cells (in particular macrophages) in vivo. Simultaneously, we used CMR tagging and strain analysis to detect regional myocardial function loss resulting from acute rejection. RESULTS Immune cells infiltration, mainly macrophages and monocytes, could be identified with CMR by in vivo labeling with ultra-small superparamagnetic-iron-oxide. Our data show that immune-cell infiltration in cardiac allograft rejection was highly heterogeneous. Thus, it is not surprising to find inconsistencies between rejection and endomyocardial biopsy results because of the limited number and small samples available. Tagged CMR and strain analysis showed that, as with immune-cell infiltration, ventricular functional loss was also heterogeneous. Although changes in global systolic function were generally not observed until the later stages of rejection, our data revealed that a functional index derived from local strain analysis correlated well with rejection grades, which may be a more sensitive parameter for detecting early rejection. CONCLUSIONS CMR is noninvasive and provides a 3-dimensional, whole-heart perspective of the rejection status, potentially allowing more reliable detection of acute allograft rejection.

[1]  C. Canter,et al.  Death after rejection with severe hemodynamic compromise in pediatric heart transplant recipients: a multi-institutional study. , 2001, The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation.

[2]  Michael Jerosch-Herold,et al.  Quantitative assessment of regional myocardial function with MR-tagging in a multi-center study: interobserver and intraobserver agreement of fast strain analysis with Harmonic Phase (HARP) MRI. , 2005, Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

[3]  L. Foley,et al.  Longitudinal Tracking of Recipient Macrophages in a Rat Chronic Cardiac Allograft Rejection Model With Noninvasive Magnetic Resonance Imaging Using Micrometer-Sized Paramagnetic Iron Oxide Particles , 2008, Circulation.

[4]  Silviu Itescu,et al.  Revision of the 1990 working formulation for the standardization of nomenclature in the diagnosis of heart rejection. , 2005, The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation.

[5]  R. Hetzer,et al.  Surveillance biopsies in heart and lung transplantation. , 2002, Transplantation proceedings.

[6]  William D Wallace,et al.  Has the 2004 revision of the International Society of Heart and Lung Transplantation grading system improved the reproducibility of the diagnosis and grading of cardiac transplant rejection? , 2009, Cardiovascular pathology : the official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Pathology.

[7]  R. Hetzer,et al.  Diagnosis of heart graft rejection , 2000 .

[8]  W. Baldwin,et al.  Update on cardiac transplantation pathology. , 2007, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[9]  L. Mestroni,et al.  Drug therapy in the heart transplant recipient: part II: immunosuppressive drugs. , 2004, Circulation.

[10]  Jerry L Prince,et al.  Visualizing myocardial function using HARP MRI. , 2000, Physics in medicine and biology.

[11]  Qing Ye,et al.  In situ labeling of immune cells with iron oxide particles: an approach to detect organ rejection by cellular MRI. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  B. Griffith,et al.  A novel approach with magnetic resonance imaging used for the detection of lung allograft rejection. , 2000, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[13]  Donald S. Williams,et al.  Detection of single mammalian cells by high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging. , 1999, Biophysical journal.

[14]  M. Boucek Surveillance endomyocardial biopsy in pediatric heart transplantation: Fashion or foible? , 2000, Pediatric transplantation.

[15]  Qing Ye,et al.  MRI investigations of graft rejection following organ transplantation using rodent models. , 2004, Methods in enzymology.

[16]  M. Fishbein,et al.  Biopsy-negative cardiac transplant rejection: etiology, diagnosis, and therapy , 2004, Current opinion in cardiology.

[17]  J. Whisstock,et al.  Computational analysis of evolution and conservation in a protein superfamily. , 2004, Methods.

[18]  José M. F. Moura,et al.  Automatic Detection of Regional Heart Rejection in USPIO-Enhanced MRI , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[19]  S. Gerlach,et al.  Diagnosis and Therapy , 1981 .

[20]  Gerald J Berry,et al.  Revision of the 1996 working formulation for the standardization of nomenclature in the diagnosis of lung rejection. , 2005, The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation.

[21]  T. Hitchens,et al.  A non-invasive approach to detecting organ rejection by MRI: monitoring the accumulation of immune cells at the transplanted organ. , 2004, Current pharmaceutical biotechnology.

[22]  M. Mehra,et al.  Anything but a biopsy: noninvasive monitoring for cardiac allograft rejection , 2002, Current opinion in cardiology.

[23]  Bartley P. Griffith,et al.  Macrophage Accumulation Associated With Rat Cardiac Allograft Rejection Detected by Magnetic Resonance Imaging With Ultrasmall Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide Particles , 2001, Circulation.

[24]  Heather Kalish,et al.  Efficient magnetic cell labeling with protamine sulfate complexed to ferumoxides for cellular MRI. , 2004, Blood.

[25]  H. Bengele,et al.  Biodistribution of an ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide colloid, BMS 180549, by different routes of administration. , 1994, Magnetic resonance imaging.