Fractal dimension in textures analysis of xenotransplants

Evaluation of the effectiveness of the healing process in postresectal and postcystal bone loss cases using techniques guided bone regeneration, observed within 1-year-long period. Radiographic images of 20 patients (17 females and 8 males) who had undergone xenotransplantation to fill jawbone losses were analyzed. The combination therapy of intraosseous deficits following xenotransplantation consisted of bone augmentation with xenogenic material together with covering regenerative membranes and tight wound closure. The bone regeneration process was estimated comparing the images taken on the day of the surgery and 12 months later, by means of digital radiography set Kodak RVG 6100. The interpretation of the RVG image depends on the assessment ability of the eye looking at it, which gives a large margin of uncertainty. Areas of interest were separated from radiographic images and binarized. On the basis of those fragments, box-counting dimension ($$D_{B}$$DB) and information dimension ($$D_{I}$$DI) were calculated. Box-counting dimension and information dimension values increase with time—image structures become more complex. Knowing that in case of normal bone regeneration, the value of the fractal dimension equals 1.0 right after the surgery and 1.6 after a year after the bone treatment, and we could use image segmentation to efficiently find fragments where this value differs from those acquired in the course of tests and quicken diagnostics of irregularities in bone tissue regeneration.

[1]  Hongwei Zhou,et al.  Box-counting methods to directly estimate the fractal dimension of a rock surface , 2014 .

[2]  Fang Liu,et al.  Periodicity, Directionality, and Randomness: Wold Features for Image Modeling and Retrieval , 1996, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[3]  J. Lawton,et al.  Fractal dimension of vegetation and the distribution of arthropod body lengths , 1985, Nature.

[4]  Marta Borowska,et al.  Fractal texture analysis of the healing process after bone loss , 2015, Comput. Medical Imaging Graph..

[5]  F. Hausdorff Dimension und äußeres Maß , 1918 .

[6]  P. Grassberger,et al.  Characterization of Strange Attractors , 1983 .

[7]  M Vogel,et al.  Trabecular bone pattern factor--a new parameter for simple quantification of bone microarchitecture. , 1992, Bone.

[8]  J R Jakobsen,et al.  Fractal dimension in radiographic analysis of alveolar process bone. , 1996, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics.

[9]  Dietmar Saupe,et al.  Chaos and fractals - new frontiers of science , 1992 .

[10]  Jack C. Yu,et al.  Fractal analysis of the PDL-bone interface and implications for orthodontic tooth movement. , 2005, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[11]  Antonio Napolitano,et al.  Fractal Dimension Estimation Methods for Biomedical Images , 2012 .

[12]  B. Oesch,et al.  Analysis of the risk of transmitting bovine spongiform encephalopathy through bone grafts derived from bovine bone. , 2001, Biomaterials.

[13]  William E. Higgins,et al.  Gabor filter design for multiple texture segmentation , 1996 .

[14]  J. Yorke,et al.  Dimension of chaotic attractors , 1982 .

[15]  Roshan Joy Martis,et al.  Asymmetry analysis of breast thermograms using automated segmentation and texture features , 2017, Signal Image Video Process..

[16]  Huiqian Du,et al.  A novel image fusion algorithm based on nonsubsampled shearlet transform and morphological component analysis , 2015, Signal, Image and Video Processing.

[17]  E. Oczeretko,et al.  Fractal Texture Analysis in the Irregular Region of Interest of the Healing Process Using Guided Bone Regeneration , 2014 .

[18]  Po-Whei Huang,et al.  Alveolar bone-loss area localization in periapical radiographs by texture analysis based on fBm model and GLC matrix , 2014, 2014 IEEE International Symposium on Bioelectronics and Bioinformatics (IEEE ISBB 2014).

[19]  H. B. Mann,et al.  On a Test of Whether one of Two Random Variables is Stochastically Larger than the Other , 1947 .

[20]  F. S. Cohen,et al.  Classification of Rotated and Scaled Textured Images Using Gaussian Markov Random Field Models , 1991, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[21]  R. L. Webber,et al.  Fractal dimension from radiographs of peridental alveolar bone. A possible diagnostic indicator of osteoporosis. , 1992, Oral surgery, oral medicine, and oral pathology.

[22]  Odemir Martinez Bruno,et al.  Texture descriptors by a fractal analysis of three-dimensional local coarseness , 2015, Digit. Signal Process..

[23]  B. Leroux,et al.  Fractal dimension evaluation of cone beam computed tomography in patients with bisphosphonate-associated osteonecrosis. , 2011, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[24]  A. Besicovitch,et al.  On the fundamental geometrical properties of linearly measurable plane sets of points , 1928 .

[25]  Salem Nasri,et al.  Automatic recognition of woven fabrics based on texture and using SVM , 2010, Signal Image Video Process..

[26]  Madasu Hanmandlu,et al.  Detection of defects in fabrics using topothesy fractal dimension features , 2015, Signal Image Video Process..

[27]  Qian Kemao,et al.  Two-dimensional windowed Fourier transform for fringe pattern analysis: Principles, applications and implementations , 2007 .

[28]  Robert M. Haralick,et al.  Textural Features for Image Classification , 1973, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[29]  N. Otsu A threshold selection method from gray level histograms , 1979 .

[30]  Gabriele A. Losa,et al.  From Fractal Geometry to Fractal Analysis , 2016 .