Hypothesis derivation and its verification by a wholly automated many-objective evolutionary optimization system

This study has constructed a fully automated multidisciplinary and many-objective evolutionary design optimization system independent of computer environments to evaluate objective functions; the research applied it to a geometric design problem of a flyback booster for next-generation space transportation. In optimization involving objective functions to appraise the aero-/structural-dynamic performance with high fidelity, spatial discretization hinders the overall automation. This research has facilitated an efficient optimal design by wholly automating high-fidelity assessments, which designers had to implement manually, and has accomplished optimizations that directly contribute to real-world design problems. Moreover, this study would accumulate design knowledge for space transportation that the market is reviving. The total automated system yielded the embedding of geometric trait lines to ensure the discretization even for large curvature surfaces; the system innovated a robust automatic error-checking mechanism in the system’s preprocess. Consequently, the entirely automatized optimization procured nondominated solution sets for more precise data analyses in a pragmatic execution period. Design informatics, a framework combining optimization and data analysis, functioned usefully in real-world design on flyback-booster geometry by materializing smooth deriving and verifying a design hypothesis; eventually, the research gained a new design principle.

[1]  Yasushi Ito,et al.  Reliable Isotropic Tetrahedral Mesh Generation Based on an Advancing Front Method , 2004, IMR.

[2]  Naoki Hamada,et al.  Evolutionary Multidisciplinary Design Optimization of Blended-Wing-Body-Type Flyback Booster , 2019, AIAA Scitech 2019 Forum.

[3]  Pedro Simplício,et al.  Reusable Launchers: Development of a Coupled Flight Mechanics, Guidance, and Control Benchmark , 2020 .

[4]  Hisao Ishibuchi,et al.  A Framework to Handle Multimodal Multiobjective Optimization in Decomposition-Based Evolutionary Algorithms , 2020, IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation.

[5]  Atsushi Hashimoto,et al.  Toward the Fastest Unstructured CFD Code "FaSTAR" , 2012 .

[6]  J. Samareh Survey of Shape Parameterization Techniques for High-Fidelity Multidisciplinary Shape Optimization , 2001 .

[7]  Solomon Tesfamariam,et al.  Constrained multi-objective optimization algorithms: Review and comparison with application in reinforced concrete structures , 2019, Appl. Soft Comput..

[8]  Alan M. Shih,et al.  Hybrid mesh generation with embedded surfaces using a multiple marching direction approach , 2011 .

[9]  Alan M. Shih,et al.  Solution Adaptive Mesh Generation Using Feature-Aligned Embedded Surface Meshes , 2009 .

[10]  Raphael T. Haftka,et al.  Surrogate Model-Based Optimization Framework: A Case Study in Aerospace Design , 2007, Evolutionary Computation in Dynamic and Uncertain Environments.

[11]  Markus P. Rumpfkeil,et al.  Optimizations Under Uncertainty Using Gradients, Hessians, and Surrogate Models , 2013 .

[12]  Swagatam Das,et al.  Performance assessment of the metaheuristic optimization algorithms: an exhaustive review , 2020, Artif. Intell. Rev..

[13]  J. Alonso,et al.  A Coupled-Adjoint Sensitivity Analysis Method for High-Fidelity Aero-Structural Design , 2005 .

[14]  Kazuhiro Nakahashi,et al.  Multidisciplinary Design Optimization and Data Mining for Transonic Regional-Jet Wing , 2007 .

[15]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  Extreme visualization: squeezing a billion records into a million pixels , 2008, SIGMOD Conference.

[16]  Takeshi Takatoya,et al.  Design-Informatics Approach for Intimate Configuration of Silent Supersonic Technology Demonstrator , 2009 .

[17]  Takashi Matsuno,et al.  Efficient global optimization applied to wind tunnel evaluation-based optimization for improvement of flow control by plasma actuators , 2015 .

[18]  Joaquim R. R. A. Martins,et al.  High-Fidelity Aerostructural Design Optimization of a Supersonic Business Jet , 2002 .

[19]  Kazuhisa Chiba,et al.  Completely Automated System for Evolutionary Design Optimization with Unstructured Computational Fluid Dynamics , 2019, Proceedings of the 2019 3rd International Conference on Intelligent Systems, Metaheuristics & Swarm Intelligence.

[20]  Ross T. Whitaker,et al.  Particle-based Sampling and Meshing of Surfaces in Multimaterial Volumes , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[21]  Alan M. Shih,et al.  Efficient Computational Fluid Dynamics Evaluation of Small-Device Locations with Automatic Local Remeshing , 2009 .

[22]  Mark Harris,et al.  The heavy lift: Blue origin's next rocket engine could power our return to the moon , 2019, IEEE Spectrum.

[23]  Christine M. Darden Sonic boom theory - Its status in prediction and minimization , 1977 .

[24]  Dik Lun Lee,et al.  SkyLens: Visual Analysis of Skyline on Multi-Dimensional Data , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[25]  Ujjwal Maulik,et al.  A Survey of Multiobjective Evolutionary Algorithms for Data Mining: Part I , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation.

[26]  Kazuhisa Chiba,et al.  Many-Objective Multidisciplinary Evolutionary Design for Hybrid-Wing-Body-Type Flyback Booster on an Entirely Automated System , 2021 .

[27]  Alan M. Shih,et al.  Three‐dimensional automatic local remeshing for two or more hybrid meshes , 2011 .

[28]  Antonio J. Nebro,et al.  A Study of the Parallelization of the Multi-Objective Metaheuristic MOEA/D , 2010, LION.

[29]  Alexandros Tzanetos,et al.  Nature inspired optimization algorithms or simply variations of metaheuristics? , 2020, Artificial Intelligence Review.

[30]  Kazuhiro Nakahashi,et al.  Multiple Marching Direction Approach to Generate High-Quality Hybrid Meshes , 2007 .

[31]  Qingfu Zhang,et al.  MOEA/D: A Multiobjective Evolutionary Algorithm Based on Decomposition , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation.

[32]  Daisuke Sasaki,et al.  Automated Aerodynamic Optimization System for SST Wing-Body Configuration , 2004 .

[33]  Yasushi Ito,et al.  Octree‐based reasonable‐quality hexahedral mesh generation using a new set of refinement templates , 2009 .

[34]  Kazuhiro Nakahashi,et al.  Improvements in the reliability and quality of unstructured hybrid mesh generation , 2004 .

[35]  Kazuhiro Nakahashi,et al.  Direct Surface Triangulation Using Stereolithography Data , 2002 .

[36]  Donald R. Jones,et al.  Efficient Global Optimization of Expensive Black-Box Functions , 1998, J. Glob. Optim..

[37]  Alan M. Shih,et al.  Efficient Hybrid Surface and Volume Mesh Generation for Viscous Flow Simulations , 2011 .

[38]  Daisuke Sasaki,et al.  Multiobjective evolutionary computation for supersonic wing-shape optimization , 2000, IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput..

[39]  Andrew S. Hahn,et al.  Vehicle Sketch Pad: a Parametric Geometry Modeler for Conceptual Aircraft Design , 2010 .

[40]  Thomas J. Santner,et al.  Design and analysis of computer experiments , 1998 .

[41]  H. Heatherly,et al.  Triangular Matrix Representations , 2000 .

[42]  Kazuhiro Nakahashi,et al.  Design exploration of aerodynamic wing shape for reusable launch vehicle flyback booster , 2006 .

[43]  Martin D. Buhmann,et al.  Radial Basis Functions , 2021, Encyclopedia of Mathematical Geosciences.

[44]  Farrokh Mistree,et al.  Kriging Models for Global Approximation in Simulation-Based Multidisciplinary Design Optimization , 2001 .

[45]  Sebastián Ventura,et al.  A survey of many-objective optimisation in search-based software engineering , 2019, J. Syst. Softw..

[46]  Carlos A. Coello Coello,et al.  Multiobjective Evolutionary Algorithms in Aeronautical and Aerospace Engineering , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation.

[47]  Daniel A. Keim,et al.  Knowledge Generation Model for Visual Analytics , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[48]  Hongyu Zhou,et al.  Glide guidance for reusable launch vehicles using analytical dynamics , 2020 .

[49]  Kazuhiro Nakahashi,et al.  Surface triangulation for polygonal models based on CAD data , 2002 .

[50]  Pierre Dragicevic,et al.  Rolling the Dice: Multidimensional Visual Exploration using Scatterplot Matrix Navigation , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.